Abstract
In recent years, altered forest conditions, climate change, and the increasing numbers of homes built in fire prone areas has meant that wildfires are affecting more people. An important part of minimizing the potential negative impacts of wildfire is engaging homeowners in mitigating the fire hazard on their land. It is therefore important to understand what makes homeowners more or less willing to take action. The research presented here comes from a study that interviewed a total of 198 homeowners in six communities in the western United States about the activities they had undertaken to mitigate their fire risk, the factors that contributed to their decisions, and their future intentions. The current paper reports on findings from the first half of the longitudinal study, after 3 years we will return to interview the current homeowner on the same properties to assess maintenance actions and facilitating and limiting factors. Overall we found a body of individuals who understand the fire risk, are taking numerous mitigation actions, and think that these actions have reduced their risk. These homeowners typically did not expect the government to do it for them: they wanted information about what to do and, in some cases, assistance with the work, but saw taking care of their property primarily as their responsibility. Responses also show that key information sources and motivating factors vary by location and that it is not inherently necessary to have relationships between community members to create defensible space.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Babbie E (2001) The practice of social research, 9th edn. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, Inc, Belmont
Brenkert-Smith H, Champ PA, Flores N (2006) Insights into wildfire mitigation decisions among wildland-urban interface residents. Society and Natural Resources 19:759–768
Bright AD, Burtz RT (2006) Creating defensible space in the wildland-urban interface: the influence of values on perceptions and behavior. Environmental Management 37:170–185
Cohen JD (2000) Preventing disaster: home ignitability in the wildland-urban interface. Journal of Forestry 98:15–21
Cohn PJ, Williams DR, Carroll MS (2008) Wildland-urban interface residents’ views on risk and attribution. In: Martin WE, Raish C, Kent B (eds) Wildfire risk: human perceptions and management implications. Resources for the Future, Washington, pp 23–43
Daniel TC (2007) Perceptions of wildfire risk. In: Daniel TC, Carroll MS, Moseley C, Raish C (eds) People, fire, and forests: a synthesis of wildfire social science. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, pp 55–69
Daniel TC (2008) Managing individual responses: Lessons from public health risk behavioral research. In: Martin WE, Raish C, Kent B (eds) Wildfire risk: human perceptions and management implications. Resources for the Future, Washington, pp 103–116
Gardner PD, Cortner HJ, Widaman K (1987) The risk perceptions and policy response toward wildland fire hazards by urban home-owners. Landscape and Urban Planning 14:163–172
Gorte RW (2006) Forest fire/wildfire protection; RL30755. Congressional Research Service, The Library of Congress, Washington
Jakes PJ, Nelson K, Lang E, Monroe M, Agrawal S, Kruger L, Sturtevant V (2003) A model for improving community preparedness for wildfire. In: Jakes, P (ed), Homeowners, communities, and wildfire: science findings from the National Fire Plan. Proceedings of the 9th international symposium on society and resource management, GTR-NC-231, USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station, St. Paul, Minnesota, pp 4–9
Jakes PJ, Kruger L, Monroe M, Nelson K, Sturtevant V (2004) Partners in wildland fire preparedness: lessons from communities in the U.S. In: 3rd International symposium on human behavior in fire: public fire safety—professionals in partnership. Interscience Communications, London, UK, pp 139–150
Jakes PJ, Kruger L, Monroe M, Nelson K, Sturtevant V (2007) Improving wildfire preparedness: lessons from communities across the U.S. Human Ecology Review 14:188–197
Kent B, Gebert K, McCaffrey S, Martin W, Calkin D, Schuster E, Martin I, Bender HW, Alward G, Kumagai Y, Cohn PJ, Carroll M, Williams D, Ekarius C (2003) Social and economic issues of the Hayman Fire. In: Graham RT (ed) Hayman fire case study, RMRS-GTR-114. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, pp 315–395
Knowles MS, Holton EF III, Swanson RS (1998) The adult learner, 5th edn. Gulf, Houston
Kruger LE, Agrawal S, Monroe M, Lang E, Nelson K, Jakes P, Sturtevant V, McCaffrey S, Everett Y (2003) Keys to community preparedness for wildfire. In: Jakes P (ed) Homeowners, communities, and wildfire: science findings from the National Fire Plan. Proceedings of the 9th international symposium on society and resource management, GTR-NC-231, USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station, St. Paul, Minnesota, pp 10–17
Kvale S (1996) Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
Martin IM, Bender HW, Raish C (2008) Making the decision to mitigate risk. In: Martin WE, Raish C, Kent B (eds) Wildfire risk: human perceptions and management implications. Resources for the Future, Washington, pp 117–141
McCaffrey S (2004) Thinking of wildfire as a natural hazard. Society and Natural Resources 17:509–516
McCaffrey S (2008) Understanding public perspectives of wildfire risk. In: Martin WE, Raish C, Kent B (eds) Wildfire Risk: Human Perceptions and Management Implications. Resources for the Future, Washington, pp 11–22
McCaffrey S, Kumagai Y (2007) No need to reinvent the wheel: applying existing social science theories to wildfire. In: Daniel TC, Carroll MS, Moseley C, Raish C (eds) People, fire, and forests: a synthesis of wildfire social science. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, pp 12–36
Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) An expanded sourcebook: qualitative data analysis, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
Monroe MC, Nelson KC (2004) The value of assessing public perceptions: wildland fire and defensible space. Applied Environmental Education and Communication 3:109–118
Monroe MC, Long AJ, Marynowski S (2003) Wildland fire in the Southeast: negotiating guidelines for defensible space. Journal of Forestry 101:14–19
Monroe MC, Pennisi L, McCaffrey S, Mileti D (2006) Social science to improve fuels management: a synthesis of research related to communicating with the public on fuels management efforts. GTR NC-267 USDA Forest Service. North Central Research Station, St. Paul
Nelson KC, Monroe MC, Johnson JF, Bowers A (2004) Living with fire: Homeowner assessment of landscape values and defensible space in Minnesota and Florida, USA. International Journal of Wildland Fire 13:413–425
Noss RF, Franklin JF, Baker WL, Schoennagel T, Moyle PB (2006) Managing fire-prone forests in the western United States. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4:481–487
Oregon Forestland-Urban Interface Protection Act (1997) In: OR. REV. STAT., vol 477.015–477.061
Pierce JL, Meyer GA, Jull AJT (2004) Fire-induced erosion and millenial-scale climate change in northern ponderosa pine forests. Nature 432:87–90
Rubin HJ, Rubin IS (2005) Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
Shiralipour HJ, Monroe MC, Nelson KC, Payton M (2006) Working with neighborhood organizations to promote wildfire preparedness. In: McCaffrey SM (ed) The Public and Wildland Fire Management: Social Science Findings for Managers; GTR-NRS-1. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, pp 151–162
Steelman TA (2008) Addressing the mitigation paradox at the community level. In: Martin WE, Raish C, Kent B (eds) Wildfire risk: human perceptions and management implications. Resources for the Future, Washington, pp 64–80
Toman E, Shindler B, Brunson M (2006) Fire and fuel management communication strategies: citizen evaluations of agency outreach programs. Society and Natural Resources 19:321–336
Toman E, Stidham M, Shindler B, McCaffrey S (2011) Reducing fuels in the wildland urban interface: community perceptions of agency fuels treatments. International Journal of Wildland Fire 20:340–349
Weinstein ND, Nicolich M (1993) Correct and incorrect interpretations of correlations between risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Health Psychology 12:235–245
Weisshaupt BR, Jakes PJ, Carroll MS, Blatner KA (2007) Northern inland west land/homeowner perceptions of fire risk and responsibility in the wildland-urban interface. Human Ecology Review 14:177–187
Westerling AL, Hidalgo HG, Cayan DR, Swetnam TW (2006) Warming and earlier spring increase western U.S. forest wildfire activity. Science 313:940–943
Winter G, Fried JS (2000) Homeowner perspectives on fire hazard, responsibility, and management strategies at the wildland-urban interface. Society and Natural Resources 13:33–49
Winter G, McCaffrey SM, Vogt CA (2009) The role of community policies in defensible space compliance. Forest Policy and Economics 11:570–578
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station for providing funding for this project. The authors also express thanks to Jim Bennett, Stacey Sargent Frederick, Angela Mallon, and Patrick Shannon for their help with data collection as well as to all the property owners who participated in this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McCaffrey, S.M., Stidham, M., Toman, E. et al. Outreach Programs, Peer Pressure, and Common Sense: What Motivates Homeowners to Mitigate Wildfire Risk?. Environmental Management 48, 475–488 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9704-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9704-6