Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Complication of AQUAfilling® Gel Injection for Breast Augmentation: Case Report of One Case and Review of Literature

  • Original Article
  • Breast Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Augmentation mammoplasty is one of the most popular aesthetic operations in the world. In Korea, one of the fillers used for breast augmentation is AQUAfilling® gel (Biomedica. spol, s,r,o, Czech Republic). AQUAfilling® gel is a hydrophilic gel composed of 98% sodium chloride solution (0.9%) and 2% cation copolyamide.

Methods

This is a case report describing a patient that suffered complications after AQUAfilling® gel injection for breast augmentation.

Results

A 32-year-old female patient was referred to our plastic surgery department with a chief complaint of repeated wound dehiscence and fluid discharge involving both breasts. She was treated via surgical intervention for removal of necrotic infected tissue and filler, as well as massive irrigation three times. After the third surgery, there were no complications, including infection or dehiscence, during a 1-year follow-up period.

Conclusions

Although AQUAfilling® gel is easy to inject and is natural looking, once a complication occurs, treatment is difficult. Also, there are concerns regarding toxicity of the gel material and its influence on surrounding tissues. Hence, sufficient evidences of long-term safety must be accumulated and proved, until which time the aesthetic use of the unapproved filler must be restricted.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shin JH, Suh JS, Yang SG (2015) Correcting shape and size using temporary filler after breast augmentation with silicone implants. Arch Aesthetic Plast Surg 21:124–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Amin Snehal P, Marmur Ellen S, Goldberg David J (2004) Complications from injectable polyacrylamide gel, a new nonbiodegradable soft tissue filler. Dermatol Surg 30(12 Part 2):1507–1509

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Christensen Lise H, Breiting V, Aasted A, Jørgensen J, Kebuladze I (2003) Long term effects of polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAAG, Interfall/Contura SA) in human breast tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:1883–1890

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. US Food and Drug Administration (2015) Soft tissue fillers: dermal fillers. US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring

    Google Scholar 

  5. Roh TS (2016) Position statement of Korean Academic Society of Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery: concerning the use of Aquafilling® for breast augmentation. Arch Aesthetic Plast Surg 22:45–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Arslan Gozde, Celik Levent, Atasoy Mehmet Mahir, Celik Levent, Cubuk Rahmi (2017) Complication of non-US guided procedure of aquafilling breast gel. Med Ultrason 19(2):236–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Okubo M, Hyakusoku H, Kanno K, Fumiiri M (1992) Complications after injection mammaplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 16:181–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ohtake N, Koganei Y, Itoh M, Shioya N (1989) Postoperative sequel of augmentation mammaplasty by injection method in Japan. Aesth Plast Surg 13:67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Breiting V, Aasted A, Jørgensen A (2004) A study on patients treated with polyacrylamide hydrogel injection for facial corrections. Aesthetic Plast Surg 28:45–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Peters W, Fornasier V (2009) Complications from injectable materials used for breast augmentation. Can J Plast Surg 17:89–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Patlazhan G, Unukovych D, Pshenisnov K (2013) Breast reconstruction and treatment algorithm for patients with complications after polyacrylamide gel injections: a 10-year experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg 37:312–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ono S, Ogawa R, Hyakusoku H (2010) Complications after polyacrylamide hydrogel injection for soft-tissue augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:1349–1357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith EA, Oehme FW (1991) Acrylamide and polyacrylamide: a review of production, use, environmental fate and neurotoxicity. Rev Environ Health 9:215–228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dearfield KL, Douglas GR, Ehling UH (1995) Acrylamide: a review of its genotoxicity and an assessment of heritage genetic risk. Mutat Res 330:71–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lin WC, Hsu GC, Hsu YC (2008) A late complication of augmentation mammoplasty by polyacrylamide hydrogel injection: ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging findings of huge galactocele formation in a puerperal woman with pathological correlation. Breast J 14:584–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kneeshaw PJ, Lowry M, Manton D (2006) Differentiation of benign from malignant breast disease associated with screening detected microcalcifications using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Breast 15:29–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tai Suk Roh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jung, B.K., Yun, I.S., Kim, Y.S. et al. Complication of AQUAfilling® Gel Injection for Breast Augmentation: Case Report of One Case and Review of Literature. Aesth Plast Surg 42, 1252–1256 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1107-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1107-0

Keywords

Navigation