Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prevention of Capsular Contracture with Guardix-SG® After Silicone Implant Insertion

  • Original Article
  • Breast
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Capsular contracture is the most common side effect of breast implant insertion and the problem that breast surgeons seek to avoid the most. Previous animal studies have proved that an antiadhesive barrier solution (AABS) prevents peri-implant capsule formation. In this study, the authors sought to explore the effect that Guardix-SG®, an AABS that can encapsulate implants in the form of a gel, can have on capsular contracture.

Method

This study used 12 female New Zealand white rabbits weighing 2.5–3 kg. Implants were inserted into the subpanniculus carnosus plane through an incision in the bilateral midback area. Once the implant was inserted, 3 g of Guardix-SG® and normal saline were instilled into the left and right sides, respectively. The rabbits were killed 6 months after the procedure. The intracapsular pressure was measured using tonometry with a 38.2-g circular glass piece, and capsular thickness was measured by dyeing the biopsy specimen with hematoxylin and eosin and Masson’s trichrome stain. The myofibroblasts were quantitatively analyzed through monoclonal anti-alpha smooth muscle actin antibody immunohistochemistry staining.

Results

The intracapsular pressure in the control group (4.51 ± 0.98 mmHg) was significantly higher (p = 0.002) than in the study group (3.51 ± 0.4 mmHg). The average capsular thickness was significantly greater in the control group (0.33 ± 0.15 mm; p = 0.015). In the analysis, the interrelation between capsular thickness and intracapsular pressure was insignificant in both groups, as was the number of myofibroblasts in both groups (p = 0.582).

Conclusion

Through this study, the authors were able to demonstrate that capsular contracture can be suppressed in the rabbit model by instilling Guardix-SG® after insertion of cohesive gel implants in the subpanniculus carnosus plane.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lew DH, Yoon JH, Hong JW, Tark KC (2010) Efficacy of antiadhesion barrier solution on peri-implant capsule formation in a white rat model. Ann Plast Surg 65:254–258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Moore JR (1979) Applanation tonometry of breasts. Plast Reconstr Surg 63:9–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hakelius L, Ohlsén L (1997) Tendency to capsular contracture around smooth and textured gel-filled silicone mammary implants: a five-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:1566–1569

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Burkhardt BR, Eades E (1995) The effect of Biocell texturing and povidone-iodine irrigation on capsular contracture around saline-inflatable breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 96:1317–1325

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Smahel J (1977) Histology of the capsules causing constrictive fibrosis around breast implants. Br J Plast Surg 30:324–329

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shah Z, Lehman JA Jr, Tan J (1981) Does infection play a role in breast capsular contracture? Plast Reconstr Surg 68:34–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Virden CP, Dobke MK, Stein P, Parsons CL, Frank DH (1992) Subclinical infection of the silicone breast implant surface as a possible cause of capsular contracture. Aesthetic Plast Surg 16:173–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Baker JL Jr, Chandler ML, LeVier RR (1981) Occurrence and activity of myofibroblasts in human capsular tissue surrounding mammary implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 68:905–912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Friedman H, Stonerock C, Lefaivre J, Yost M (2004) The effect of seprafilm and interceed on capsule formation around silicone discs in a rat model. J Invest Surg 17:271–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nagakura T, Hirata H, Tsujii M, Sugimoto T, Miyamoto K, Horiuchi T, Nagao M, Nakashima T, Uchida A (2005) Effect of viscous injectable pure alginate sol on cultured fibroblasts. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:831–838

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Oh SH, Kim JK, Song KS, Noh SM, Ghil SH, Yuk SH, Lee JH (2005) Prevention of postsurgical tissue adhesion by antiinflammatory drug-loaded pluronic mixtures with sol–gel transition behavior. J Biomed Mater Res A 72:306–316

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Reigel DH, Bazmi B, Shih SR, Marquardt MD (1993) A pilot investigation of poloxamer 407 for the prevention of leptomeningeal adhesions in the rabbit. Pediatr Neurosurg 19:250–255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zimman OA (2007) A rabbit model for capsular contracture: development and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:1955–1956

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bucky LP, Ehrlich HP, Sohoni S, May JW Jr. (1994) The capsule quality of saline-filled smooth silicone, textured silicone, and polyurethane implants in rabbits: a long-term study. Plast Reconstr Surg 93:1123–1131; (discussion 1132–1133)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ajmal N, Riordan CL, Cardwell N, Nanney LB, Shack RB (2003) The effectiveness of sodium 2-mercaptoethane sulfonate (mesna) in reducing capsular formation around implants in a rabbit model. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:1455–1461; (discussion 1462–1463)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Uzunismail A, Perk C, Findik H, Beyhan G, Dincler M (2008) Effect of a fascial tissue interface on silicone implant capsule formation: a preliminary experimental study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61:1199–1204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Moufarrege R, Beauregard G, Bosse JP, Papillon J, Perras C (1987) Outcome of mammary capsulotomies. Ann Plast Surg 19:62–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ersek RA (1991) Rate and incidence of capsular contracture: a comparison of smooth and textured silicone double-lumen breast prostheses. Plast Reconstr Surg 87:879–884

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Collis N, Coleman D, Foo IT, Sharpe DT (2000) Ten-year review of a prospective randomized controlled trial of textured versus smooth subglandular silicone gel breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:786–791

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hwang K, Sim HB, Huan F, Kim DJ (2010) Myofibroblasts and capsular tissue tension in breast capsular contracture. Aesthetic Plast Surg 34:716–721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Genewel, a Dongsung Company, Seongnam City, Korea.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ung Sik Jin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, S.O., Han, J., Minn, K.W. et al. Prevention of Capsular Contracture with Guardix-SG® After Silicone Implant Insertion. Aesth Plast Surg 37, 543–548 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-013-0087-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-013-0087-3

Keywords

Navigation