Abstract
Background
Aesthetic surgery procedures are increasing all over the world, and so are related medicolegal questions and litigation cases. Aesthetic mammaplasties represent a very important part of this field and consequently many cases of error appear. Most of these errors lead to litigation from which plastic surgeons rarely can be exonerated. The aim of this article was to evaluate different errors ascribed to the plastic surgeon, the rate of cases in which professional responsibility has been identified, and the type of guilt imputed.
Methods
Each case is based on the evaluation of both documentation used by the judge and the relationships of two specialists involved in the assessment of the presumed error. In every case, problems complained about by the patient and the eventually related error of the surgeon were analyzed. Moreover, the eventual identification of professional responsibility, the quantified damage, and its possible reduction by another corrective operation were considered.
Results
The cases studied (N = 50) were divided into 34 cases of augmentation mammaplasty, 11 cases of reduction mammaplasty, and 5 cases of mastopexy. Most of the problems complained about by patients were in the preoperative and intraoperative phases. In only 10% of the cases was the informed consent contested and an expected reduction of the damage was individuated in less than half of cases.
Conclusions
The evaluation of aesthetic damage is a tricky question due to different aspects such as the psychological component or the frequent lack of adequate photographic documentation of the patient before the operation. Moreover, whenever possible reduction of the damage is proposed, the patient’s willingness to undergo another operation, with all its related costs and benefits, must be considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fiori A (2009) Legal and medical liability medicine: new aspects. Ed. Giuffrè, Milan
Annual Relation of Medical Malpractice. Italian Court of Patient’s Rights Association. Riviera del Brenta. Relation 2008: 19–44. Available at: http://www.cittadinanzattiva.it/component/content/category/25.html
Buzzi F (1991) Responsibility in aesthetic surgery in light of some legal addresses of the Court of Cassation. Riv It Med Leg 13:1381
Benincasa M (1980) Legality and base of the medical-surgical activities with therapeutic goal. Riv It Dir Proc Pen fasc 3:713
Gorney M (2002) Claims prevention for the aesthetic surgeon: preparing for the less-than-perfect outcome. Facial Plast Surg 18(2):135–142
Tebbetts JB, Tebbetts TB (2002) An approach that integrates patient education and informed consent in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 110(3):971–978
Flageul G, Horay P, Rouanet F (2009) Information and assent: presentation of 32 information cards concerning plastic and aesthetic surgery. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 54(3):181–289
Sforza Maria Paola vs Milesi Olgiati Milena. Legal case of Italian Court. Cass. Civ., Sez. III, 25 November 1994, n. 10014. Available at: http://www.libertamedica.it/collegamenti/c_scc_16.html
Sinna R, Rouanet F, Delaporte T, Flageul G, Delay E (2005) Information of the patient: the characteristics of implant breast augmentation. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 50(5):605–614
Mavroforou A, Giannoukas A, Michalodimitrakis E (2004) Medical litigation in cosmetic plastic surgery. Med Law 23(3):479–488
Annual Relation of Medical Malpractice. Italian Court of Patient’s Rights Association. Riviera del Brenta. Relation 2006: 32–56. Available at: http://www.cittadinanzattiva.it/component/content/category/25.html
Parker R (2007) Cosmetic surgery in Australia: a risky business? J Law Med 15(1):14–18
Hodgson J (2010) A guide to appeals within the English legal system. Br J Nurs 19(1):48–50
Liebermeister H (2010) How to avoid liability litigation in courts – suggestions from a German example. Ger Med Sci 8
Dettmeyer R, Preuss J (2009) Medical malpractice charges in Germany––a survey. Leg Med (Tokyo) 11(Suppl 1):S132–S134
Benomran F (2010) Medical responsibility in the United Arab Emirates. J Forensic Leg Med 17(4):188–193
Chiu YC (2010) What drives patients to sue doctors? The role of cultural factors in the pursuit of malpractice claims in Taiwan. Soc Sci Med 71(4):702–707
Kachalia A, Mello MM (2011) New directions in medical liability reform. N Engl J Med 364(16):1564–1572
Leflar RB (2009) The regulation of medical malpractice in Japan. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(2):443–449
Medical Malpractice Systems around the Globe: Examples from the US- tort liability system and the Sweden- no fault system. Document of the World Bank. Russian. 2003. Report n. 29011. Available at: 194.84.38.65/files/esw_files/malpractice_systems_eng.pdf
Bal BS (2009) An Introduction to Medical Malpractice in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:339–347
Brendel RW, Wei MH, Schouten R, Edersheim JG (2010) An approach to selected legal issues: confidentiality, mandatory reporting, abuse and neglect, informed consent, capacity decisions, boundary issues, and malpractice claims. Med Clin North Am 94(6):1229–1240
Alexander AA (2010) Complaints, grievances, and claims against physicians: does tort reform make a difference? J Healthc Risk Manag 30(1):32–42
Greenberg MD (2009) Medical malpractice and new devices: defining an elusive standard of care. Health Matrix Clevel 19(2):423–445
Bal BS (2009) The expert witness in medical malpractice litigation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(2):383–391
Gualdi G (1988) Doctrinaries and legal tendencies related to responsibility of plastic surgeon. Plastic and reconstructive surgery: juridical, ethical and medicolegal aspects. Ed. Giuffrè, Milan, p 19
Schiavone M (2005) Ethical, psychological and psychopathological issues in aesthetic surgery. Jura Medica 3:443–448
Bargagna M et al (2001) Guide for impairment evaluation, 3rd edn. Giuffré Editore, Milano, pp 263–266
Ronchi E et al (2009) Guide for medico-legal evaluation of standing impairment. Giuffré Editore, Milano, pp 209–210
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest to declare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marchesi, A., Marchesi, M., Fasulo, F.C. et al. Mammaplasties and Medicolegal Issues: 50 Cases of Litigation in Aesthetic Surgery of the Breast. Aesth Plast Surg 36, 122–127 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9768-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9768-y