Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Transareolar Incision for Breast Augmentation Revisited

  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Of the various possible incisions for breast augmentation, the transareolar access has gained only limited popularity. The potential side effects of this incision are said to be altered nipple sensation, impaired lactation, an increased rate of infections with capsular fibrosis, well visible scar formation with hypopigmentation, and the need for an additional access in case a breast ptosis correction should prove necessary at a later date. The purpose of this retrospective study was to judge advantages and limitations of transareolar breast augmentation, and to verify whether the reluctant attitude toward this surgical approach is justified.

A sample of 18 patients with a transareolar, retropectoral breast augmentation was selected for a retrospective evaluation. The suitability of the technique in general was examined together with early postoperative complications, sensory changes, and late complications on the basis of an evaluation system for cosmetic surgical results.

The study showed that only women with an areolar diameter of 3.5 cm or more without pronounced breast ptosis were suitable for the transareolar access. No early infections were noted. The rate of capsular fibrosis was 11%. Two years after breast augmentation, 16 women (89%) judged their breast sensation to be normal, but objective assessment showed that mean pressure and vibration sensation were moderately compromised in all parts of the breast. The scars were of good quality, with very little hypopigmentation.

With appropriate patient selection, respecting the advantages and limitations, the transareolar incision has its definite place among the different incisions for breast augmentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J Banbury R Yetman A Lucas F Papay K Graves JE Zins (2004) ArticleTitleProspective analysis of the outcome of subpectoral breast augmentation: sensory changes, muscle function, and body image Plast Reconstr Surg 113 701–707 Occurrence Handle10.1097/01.PRS.0000101503.94322.C6 Occurrence Handle14758239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. TR Broadbent RM Woolf (1967) ArticleTitleAugmentation mammaplasty Plast Reconstr Surg 40 517–523 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CCeC3c7jvV0%3D Occurrence Handle6077712

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. RDP Craig PA Sykes (1970) ArticleTitleNipple sensivity following reduction mammaplasty Br J Plast Surg 23 165–172 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CS%2BB3svis1E%3D Occurrence Handle5464107

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. AP Cooper (1840) On the anatomy of the breast Longmann, Orme, Green, Brown and Longmanns London

    Google Scholar 

  5. EH Courtiss RM Goldwyn (1976) ArticleTitleBreast sensation before and after plastic surgery Plast Reconstr Surg 58 1–13 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CSmB38zgtVY%3D Occurrence Handle6983

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. EH Courtiss RC Webster MF White (1974) ArticleTitleSelection of alternatives in augmentation mammaplasty Plast Reconstr Surg 54 552–557 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CSqD387gt1w%3D Occurrence Handle4418574

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. JS Garner (1986) ArticleTitleCDC guideline for prevention of surgical wound infections, 1985: supercedes guideline for prevention of surgical wound infection published in 1982 Infect Control 7 193–200 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BimC28jisF0%3D Occurrence Handle3633903

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. CO Griffiths SuffixJr (1964) The submuscular implantation in augmentation mammaplasty Trans Fourth Internat Congr Plast and Reconstr Surg Medica Excerpta Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  9. NM Hurst (1996) ArticleTitleLactation after augmentation mammaplasty Obstet Gynecol 87 30–34 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0029-7844(95)00349-5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymC38zhvFc%3D Occurrence Handle8532261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. JJP Jaspers AN Posma AAH Immerseel Particlevan AC Gittenberger-de-Groot (1997) ArticleTitleThe cutaneous innervation of the female breast and nipple–areola complex: implications for surgery Br J Plast Surg 50 249–259 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0007-1226(97)91155-3 Occurrence Handle9215081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. GW Johnson JE Christ (1993) ArticleTitleThe endoscopic breast augmentation: the transumbilical insertion of saline-filled breast implants Plast Reconstr Surg 92 801–808 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuD383mslQ%3D Occurrence Handle8415961

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. FR Jones AP Tauras (1973) ArticleTitleA periareolar incision for augmentation mammaplasty Plast Reconstr Surg 1 641–644

    Google Scholar 

  13. I Pitanguy (1978) ArticleTitleTransareolar incision for breast augmentation Aesth Plast Surg 2 363–372

    Google Scholar 

  14. I Pitanguy (1996) ArticleTitleTransareolar incision for gynecomastia Plast Reconstr Surg 38 414–419

    Google Scholar 

  15. I Pitanguy SE Carreirao LC Garcia (1973) ArticleTitleTransareolar incision for augmentation mammaplasty Rev Brasil Chir 63 301–306

    Google Scholar 

  16. CI Price FF Eaves F Nahai G Jones J Bostwick (1994) ArticleTitleEndoscopic transaxillary subpectoral breast augmentation Plast Reconstr Surg 94 612–619 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqD38vks1Q%3D Occurrence Handle7938283

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. P Regnault (1996) ArticleTitleBreast ptosis definition and treatment Clin Plast Surg 3 193–203

    Google Scholar 

  18. NS Sarhadi JS Dunn DS Soutar (1996) ArticleTitleAn anatomical study of the nerve supply of the breast, including the nipple and areola Br J Plast Surg 49 156–164 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0007-1226(96)90218-0 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB2szlvFc%3D Occurrence Handle8785595

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. J Semmes-Weinstein L Ghent LH Teuber (1960) Frequency of response to a series of pressure stimuli according to log force in somatosensory changes after penetrating brain wounds in man Harvard University Press Cambridge 60–62

    Google Scholar 

  20. S Slezak LA Dellon (1993) ArticleTitleQuantitation of sensibility in gigantomastia and alteration following reduction mammaplasty Plast Reconstr Surg 91 1265–1269 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyB28fnvFM%3D Occurrence Handle8497526

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. E Strasser (1999) ArticleTitleAn objective grading system for the evaluation of cosmetic surgical results Plast Reconstr Surg 104 2282–2285 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FptlWmug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11149799

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. GV Tayrich R Kuzbari S Rigel BP Todoroff B Schneider M Deutinger (1998) ArticleTitleNormal cutaneous sensibility of the breast Plast Reconstr Surg 102 701–704 Occurrence Handle9727434

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. JB Tebbetts (2001) ArticleTitleA surgical perspective from two decades of breast augmentation: toward state of the art in 2001 Clin Plast Surg 28 425–434 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FitlKguw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11471952

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. JK Terzis MP Vincent LM Wilkins K Rutledge LM Deane (1987) ArticleTitleBreast sensibility: a neurophysiological appraisal in the normal breast Ann Plast Surg 19 318–322 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BieD2srnt10%3D Occurrence Handle3688778

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. L Widdice (1993) ArticleTitleCommentaries: the effects of breast reduction and breast augmentation surgery on lactation: an annotated bibliography J Hum Lact 9 161–167 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuD1c3oslA%3D Occurrence Handle8260032

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Landesklinikum, Feldkirch, Austria

    Peter Kompatscher M.D. & Christine Schuler M.D.

  2. Division for Plastic, Hand, and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospital (Academic Medical Center), Zürich, Switzerland

    Gertrude M. Beer M.D.

Authors
  1. Peter Kompatscher M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christine Schuler M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gertrude M. Beer M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gertrude M. Beer M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kompatscher, P., Schuler, C. & Beer, G.M. The Transareolar Incision for Breast Augmentation Revisited. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 28, 70–74 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-004-3105-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-004-3105-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation