Abstract
Honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) are obligate eusocial organisms and receive intensive parental care from their nestmates during larval and pupal development. The importance of the juvenile environment to adult behavior has been well documented in vertebrate species. However, the extent to which the developmental environment may affect adult behavior in honey bees is not well understood. We conducted a multifaceted study to compare the behavior of adult honey bees that are reared in vitro to that of bees reared by their parental colony. Laboratory assays were conducted to evaluate the following honey bee behaviors: (1) queen recognition, (2) nursing, (3) trophallactic food sharing, and (4) sucrose responsiveness. There were no statistical differences in trophallactic food sharing or queen recognition behaviors between bees reared in vitro and those reared in their parental colony. Statistically detectable differences were identified in the nursing behavior and sucrose responsiveness between bees reared in vitro and those in their parental colony. In addition to providing insights into the origin of basic honey bee behaviors, our findings relate to the relevance of in vitro rearing as a tool for assessing the risk of certain stressors, such as pesticides and pathogens, to honey bee health. Our results underscore the impact that juvenile environment can have on adult bee behavior. We assert that the immature stages of honey bee development are dynamic and that future behavioral research will benefit from accounting for the influence that the rearing environment can have on adult behavior.
Significance statement
We know little about how the environment in which bees develop might affect their behavior as adults. We conducted a series of laboratory tests to compare the behavior of adult honey bees that had been artificially reared in the laboratory to adult bees that were reared in a hive. We found that some behaviors were not affected by rearing environment. However, brood-rearing behavior was reduced in bees that had been artificially reared compared to bees that were reared in a hive. Our data suggests that some areas of honey bee behavior are influenced by the rearing environment. Artificial rearing is a useful procedure in honey bee health research, and this is the first time that the behavior of artificially reared bees has been assessed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alaux C, Sinha S, Hasadsri L, Hunt GJ, Guzmán-Novoa E, DeGrandi-Hoffman G, Uribe-Rubio JL, Southey BR, Rodriguez-Zas S, Robinson GE (2009) Honey bee aggression supports a link between gene regulation and behavioral evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:15400–15405. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907043106
Allen MD (1960) The honeybee queen and her attendants. Anim Behav 8:201–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(60)90028-2
Allsopp MH, Crewe RM (1993) The cape honey bee as a Trojan horse rather than the hordes of Genghis Khan. American Bee Journal (USA) 133:121–123
Aupinel P, Fortini D, Dufour H, Tasei J, Michaud B, Odoux J, Pham-Delegue M (2005) Improvement of artificial feeding in a standard in vitro method for rearing Apis mellifera larvae. Bull Insectology 58:107–111
Bailey DB Jr, Bruer JT, Symons FJ, Lichtman JW (2001) Critical thinking about critical periods. A series from the National Center for Early Development and Learning. ERIC
Bateson P (1979) How do sensitive periods arise and what are they for? Anim Behav 27:470–486
Becher MA, Scharpenberg H, Moritz RFA (2009) Pupal developmental temperature and behavioral specialization of honeybee workers (Apis mellifera L.). J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 195:673–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-009-0442-7
Boch R, Rothenbuhler WC (1974) Defensive behaviour and production of alarm pheromone in honeybees. J Apic Res 13:217–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.1974.11099783
Breed MD, Rogers KB (1991) The behavioral genetics of colony defense in honeybees: genetic variability for guarding behavior. Behav Genet 21:295–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065821
Breed MD, Robinson GE, Page RE (1990) Division of labor during honey bee colony defense. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:395–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00164065
Brodschneider R, Riessberger-Gallé U, Crailsheim K (2009) Flight performance of artificially reared honeybees (Apis mellifera). Apidologie 40:441–449. https://doi.org/10.1051/apido/2009006
Büchler R, Andonov S, Bienefeld K, Costa C, Hatjina F, Kezic N, Kryger P, Spivak M, Uzunov A, Wilde J (2013) Standard methods for rearing and selection of Apis mellifera queens. J Apic Res 52:1–30. https://doi.org/10.3896/IBRA.1.52.1.07
Butler CG (1954) The method and importance of the recognition by a colony of honeybees (A. mellifera) of the presence of its queen. Trans R Entomol Soc 105:11–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1954.tb00773.x
Calderone NW, Page RE (1992) Effects of interactions among genotypically diverse nestmates on task specialization by foraging honey bees (Apis mellifera). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30:219–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166706
Calderone NW, Page RE Jr (1988) Genotypic variability in age polyethism and task specialization in the honey bee, Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol (Print) 22:17–25
Caldji C, Diorio J, Meaney MJ (2000) Variations in maternal care in infancy regulate the development of stress reactivity. Biol Psychiatry 48(12):1164–1174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(00)01084-2
Ciarlo TJ, Mullin CA, Frazier JL, Schmehl DR (2012) Learning impairment in honey bees caused by agricultural spray adjuvants. PLoS One 7:e40848. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040848
Connor LJ (2009) Queen rearing essentials, 1st edn. Wicwas Press
Crailsheim K (1998) Trophallactic interactions in the adult honeybee (Apis mellifera L.). Apidologie 29:97–112. https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:19980106
Crailsheim K, Brodschneider R, Aupinel P, Behrens D, Genersch E, Vollmann J, Riessberger-Gallé U (2013) Standard methods for artificial rearing of Apis mellifera larvae. J Apic Res 52:1–16. https://doi.org/10.3896/IBRA.1.52.1.05
Delaplane KS, van der Steen J, Guzman-Novoa E (2013) Standard methods for estimating strength parameters of Apis mellifera colonies. J Apic Res 52. https://doi.org/10.3896/IBRA/1.52.1.03
Einon DF, Morgan MJ (1977) A critical period for social isolation in the rat. Dev Psychobiol 10:123–132
Fleming JC, Schmehl DR, Ellis JD (2015) Characterizing the impact of commercial pollen substitute diets on the level of Nosema spp. in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). PLoS One 10:e0132014. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132014
Free JB (1967) Factors determining the collection of pollen by honeybee foragers. Anim Behav 15:134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(67)80024-1
Freedman DG, King JA, Elliot O (1961) Critical period in the social development of dogs. Science 133:1016–1017
Friard O, Gamba M (2016) BORIS: a free, versatile open-source event-logging software for video/audio coding and live observations. Methods Ecol Evol 7:1325–1330. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12584
Frost EH, Shutler D, Hillier NK (2011) Effects of cold immobilization and recovery period on honeybee learning, memory, and responsiveness to sucrose. J Insect Physiol 57:1385–1390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.07.0
Gordon DM (2014) The ecology of collective behavior. PLoS Biol 12:e1001805. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001805
Guzmán-Novoa E, Page RE (1993) Backcrossing africanized honey bee queens to european drones reduces colony defensive behavior. Ann Entomol Soc Am 86:352–355. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/86.3.352
Haydak MH (1943) Larval food and development of castes in the honeybee. J Econ Entomol 36:778–792. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/36.5.778
Hebets EA (2003) Subadult experience influences adult mate choice in an arthropod: exposed female wolf spiders prefer males of a familiar phenotype. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:13390–13395. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2333262100
Hendriksma HP, Härtel S, Steffan-Dewenter I (2011) Honey bee risk assessment: new approaches for in vitro larvae rearing and data analyses. Methods Ecol Evol 2:509–517
Human H, Brodschneider R, Dietemann V, Dively G, Ellis JD, Forsgren E, Fries I, Hatjina F, Hu F-L, Jaffé R, Jensen AB, Köhler A, Magyar JP, Özkýrým A, Pirk CWW, Rose R, Strauss U, Tanner G, Tarpy DR, van der Steen JJM, Vaudo A, Vejsnæs F, Wilde J, Williams GR, Zheng H-Q (2013) Miscellaneous standard methods for Apis mellifera research. J Apic Res 52:1–53. https://doi.org/10.3896/IBRA.1.52.4.10
Hunt GJ, Amdam GV, Schlipalius D, Emore C, Sardesai N, Williams CE, Rueppell O, Guzmán-Novoa E, Arechavaleta-Velasco M, Chandra S, Fondrk MK, Beye M, Page RE (2007) Behavioral genomics of honeybee foraging and nest defense. Naturwissenschaften 94:247–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-006-0183-1
Jandt JM, Gordon DM (2016) The behavioral ecology of variation in social insects. Curr Opin Insect Sci 15:40–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2016.02.012
Jones JC, Helliwell P, Beekman M, Maleszka R, Oldroyd BP (2005) The effects of rearing temperature on developmental stability and learning and memory in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 191:1121–1129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-005-0035-z
Kaftanoglu O, Linksvayer TA, Page RE (2010) Rearing honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) in vitro: effects of feeding intervals on survival and development. J Apic Res 49:311–317. https://doi.org/10.3896/IBRA.1.49.4.03
Kaftanoglu O, Linksvayer TA, Page RE (2011) Rearing honey bees, Apis mellifera, in vitro 1: effects of sugar concentrations on survival and development. J Insect Sci 11:96–10. https://doi.org/10.1673/031.011.9601
Kaminski LA, Slessor KN, Winston ML, Hay NW, Borden JH (1990) Honeybee response to queen mandibular pheromone in laboratory bioassays. J Chem Ecol 16:841–850. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01016494
Knudsen EI (2004) Sensitive periods in the development of the brain and behavior. J Cogn Neurosci 16:1412–1425. https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929042304796
Maestripieri D (1999) The biology of human parenting: insights from nonhuman primates. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 23:411–422
Moritz RFA, Hallmen M (1986) Trophallaxis of worker honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) of different ages. Insect Soc 33:26–31
Moritz RFA, Southwick EE (1992) Bees as superorganisms: an evolutionary reality. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Mortensen AN, Ellis JD (2018) A honey bee (Apis mellifera) colony’s brood survival rate predicts its in vitro-reared brood survival rate. Apidology (in prep)
OECD (2015) Honey bee (Apis mellifera) larval toxicity test, repeated exposure. OECD DRAFT GUIDANCE DOCUMENT
Page RE Jr, Fondrk MK, Erber J (1998) The effect of genotype on response thresholds to sucrose and foraging behavior of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 182:489–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003590050196
Pankiw T, Page RE (2003) Effect of pheromones, hormones, and handling on sucrose response thresholds of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 189:675–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-003-0442-y
Rembold H, Lackner B (1981) Rearing of honeybee larvae in vitro—effect of yeast extract on queen differentiation. J Apic Res 20:165–171
Rembold H, Czoppelt C, Rao PJ (1974) Effect of juvenile hormone treatment on caste differentiation in the honeybee, Apis mellifera. J Insect Physiol 20:1193–1202
Rittschof CC, Coombs CB, Frazier M, Grozinger CM, Robinson GE (2015) Early-life experience affects honey bee aggression and resilience to immune challenge. Sci Rep 5:15572. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15572
Robinson GE (1992) Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Annu Rev Entomol 37:637–665. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.37.010192.003225
Robinson GE, Page RE (1989) Genetic determination of nectar foraging, pollen foraging, and nest-site scouting in honey bee colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:317–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00290908
Robinson GE, Page RE, Strambi C, Strambi A (1989) Hormonal and genetic control of behavioral integration in honey bee colonies. Science 246:109–112. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.246.4926.109
Rueppell O, Chandra SBC, Pankiw T, Fondrk MK, Beye M, Hunt G, Page RE (2006) The genetic architecture of sucrose responsiveness in the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.). Genetics 172:243–251. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.105.046490
Scheiner R, Abramson CI, Brodschneider R, Crailsheim K, Farina WM, Fuchs S, Grünewald B, Hahshold S, Karrer M, Koeniger G, Koeniger N, Menzel R, Mujagic S, Radspieler G, Schmickl T, Schneider C, Siegel AJ, Szopek M, Thenius R (2013) Standard methods for behavioural studies of Apis mellifera. J Apic Res 52:1–58. https://doi.org/10.3896/IBRA.1.52.4.04
Schmehl DR, Tomé HVV, Mortensen AN, Martins GF, Ellis JD (2016) Protocol for the in vitro rearing of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) workers. J Apic Res 55:113–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2016.1203530
Schmickl T, Crailsheim K (2002) How honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) change their broodcare behaviour in response to non-foraging conditions and poor pollen conditions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (Print) 51:415–425
Schmid-Hempel P, Kacelnik A, Houston AI (1985) Honeybees maximize efficiency by not filling their crop. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:61–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299430
Schneider SS, Leamy LJ, Lewis LA, DeGrandi-Hoffman G (2003) The influence of hybridization between African and European honeybees, Apis mellifera, on asymmetries in wing size and shape. Evolution 57:2350–2364
Schulz DJ, Vermiglio MJ, Huang ZY, Robinson GE (2002) Effects of colony food shortage on social interactions in honey bee colonies. Insect Soc 49:50–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-002-8279-x
Scofield HN, Mattila HR (2015) Honey bee workers that are pollen stressed as larvae become poor foragers and waggle dancers as adults. PLoS One 10:e0121731. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121731
Seeley TD (1982) Adaptive significance of the age polyethism schedule in honeybee colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (Print) 11:287–293
Seeley TD (1985) Honeybee ecology: a study of adaptation in social life. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Seeley TD (1996) The wisdom of the hive: the social physiology of honey bee colonies. Harvard University Press
Seely TD (1979) Queen substance dispersal by messenger workers in honeybee colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5:391–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292527
Shpigler HY, Robinson GE (2015) Laboratory assay of brood care for quantitative analyses of individual differences in honey bee (Apis mellifera) affiliative behavior. PLoS One 10:e0143183. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143183
Shuel RW, Dixon SE (1986) An artificial diet for laboratory rearing of honeybees. J Apic Res 25:35–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.1986.11100689
Silva IC, Message D, Cruz CD, Campos LAO, Sousa-Majer MJ (2009) Rearing Africanized honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) brood under laboratory conditions. Genet Mol Res 8:623–629
Strodl MA, Schausberger P (2012) Social familiarity modulates group living and foraging behaviour of juvenile predatory mites. Naturwissenschaften 99:303–311
Tautz J, Maier S, Groh C, Rossler W, Brockmann A (2003) Behavioral performance in adult honey bees is influenced by the temperature experienced during their pupal development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:7343–7347. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1232346100
Vandenberg JD, Shimanuki H (1987) Technique for rearing worker honeybees in the laboratory. J Apic Res 26:90–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.1987.11100743
Velthuis HHW, van Es J (1964) Some functional aspects of the mandibular glands of the queen honeybee. J Apic Res 3:11–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.1964.11100076
von Frisch K (1967) The dance language and orientation of bees. Belknap Press
Wang Y, Ma L, Zhang W, Cui X, Wang H, Xu B (2016) Comparison of the nutrient composition of royal jelly and worker jelly of honey bees (Apis mellifera). Apidologie 47:48–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-015-0374-x
Weaver N (1957) Effects of larval age on dimorphic differentiation of the female honey bee. Ann Entomol Soc Am 50:283–294
Williams GR, Alaux C, Costa C, Csáki T, Doublet V, Eisenhardt D, Fries I, Kuhn R, McMahon DP, Medrzycki P, Murray TE, Natsopoulou ME, Neumann P, Oliver R, Paxton RJ, Pernal SF, Shutler D, Tanner G, van der Steen JJM, Brodschneider R (2013) Standard methods for maintaining adult Apis mellifera in cages under in vitro laboratory conditions. J Apic Res 52:1–36. https://doi.org/10.3896/IBRA.1.52.1.04
Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Massachusetts
Winston ML (1991) The biology of the honey bee. Harvard University Press
Winston ML, Katz SJ (1981) Longevity of cross-fostered honey bee workers (Apis mellifera) of European and Africanized races. Can J Zool 59:1571–1575. https://doi.org/10.1139/z81-214
Winston ML, Slessor KN (1992) The essence of royalty: honey bee queen pheromone. Am Sci 80:374–385
Winston ML, Slessor KN, Willis LG, Naumann K, Higo HA, Wyborn MH, Kaminski LA (1989) The influence of queen mandibular pheromones on worker attraction to swarm clusters and inhibition of queen rearing in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Insect Soc 36:15–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02225877
Woyke J (1984) Correlations and interactions between population, length of worker life and honey production by honeybees in a temperate region. J Apic Res 23:148–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.1984.11100624
Wray MK, Mattila HR, Seeley TD (2011) Collective personalities in honeybee colonies are linked to colony fitness. Anim Behav 81:559–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.11.027
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Daniel Schmehl and Hudson Tomé for their help troubleshooting the in vitro rearing protocol, Cameron Jack for assistance in rearing honey bee larvae, Brandi Simmons and Emily Helton for ordering and preparing project supplies, Logan Cutts for managing healthy honey bee colonies, Vince Alderman for his diligent construction of project tools, and Edzar vanSantan for statistical consultation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Additional information
Communicated by C. Grozinger
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mortensen, A.N., Ellis, J.D. The effects of artificial rearing environment on the behavior of adult honey bees, Apis mellifera L.. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 72, 92 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-018-2507-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-018-2507-5