Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of age and relatedness on mating patterns in thornbug treehoppers: inbreeding avoidance or inbreeding tolerance?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The social environment of many species includes synchronous maturation of siblings in family groups, followed by limited dispersal of adults from their natal site. Under these conditions, females may experience high encounter rates with same-age siblings during mate searching, increasing their risk of inbreeding. If inbreeding depression occurs, mating with a sibling is often considered maladaptive; however, in some contexts, the inclusive fitness benefits of inbreeding may outweigh the costs, favoring females that tolerate some level of inbreeding depression. We evaluated mating patterns in the treehopper Umbonia crassicornis, a semelparous species in which females encounter same-age siblings during mate searching. A female U. crassicornis that mates with a brother suffers from inbreeding depression. We used a free-choice mating design that offered females simultaneous mating opportunities with three groups of males: siblings, same-age nonsiblings, and older nonsiblings. These groups represent the types of males typically encountered by females during mate searching. Our goal was to assess whether mating patterns were influenced by inbreeding avoidance by evaluating two hypotheses: kin discrimination and age-based mating (older males cannot be siblings in this species). There was no difference in the proportions of females mating with siblings vs nonsiblings, suggesting an absence of kin discrimination. However, females mated with a greater proportion of older vs younger males. Given that females do not avoid siblings as mates despite a cost to inbreeding, our results provide a possible example of inbreeding tolerance. We also discuss some factors that may have contributed to the mating advantage of older males.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aviles L, Bukowski TC (2005) Group living and inbreeding depression in a subsocial spider. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 273:157–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson P (1983a) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson P (1983b) Optimal outbreeding. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 257–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson M, Healy SD (2005) Comparative evaluation and its implications for mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol 20:659–664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks R, Kemp DJ (2001) Can older males deliver the good genes? Trends Ecol Evol 16:308–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Candolin U (2003) The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biol Rev 78:575–595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD (1979) The roaring of red deer and the evolution of honest advertisement. Behaviour 69:145–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cocroft RB (1996) Insect vibrational defence signals. Nature 382:679–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cocroft RB, McNett GD (2006) Vibrational communication in treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae). In: Claridge MF, Drosopolous S (eds) Insect sounds and communication: physiology, behaviour, ecology and evolution. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 321–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner J (1989) Older males have higher insemination success in a beetle. Anim Behav 38:503–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cote IM, Hunte W (1993) Female redlip blennies prefer older males. Anim Behav 46:203–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson JL (2001) Extrapair copulations in western bluebirds (Salia mexicana): female receptivity favors older males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:423–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felton A, Alford RA, Fenton AM, Schwarzkopf L (2006) Multiple mate choice criteria and the importance of age for male mating success in the microhylid frog, Cophixalus ornatus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:786–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasselquist D (1998) Polygyny in great reed warblers: a long term study of factors contributing to male fitness. Ecology 79:2376–2390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebets EA (2003) Subadult experience influences adult mate choice in an arthropod: exposed female wolf spiders prefer males of a familiar phenotype. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:13390–13395

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hebets EA, Papaj DR (2005) Complex signal function: developing a framework for testable hypotheses. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:197–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennions MD, Petrie M (1997) Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol Rev 72:283–327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones TM, Elgar MA (2004) The role of male age, sperm age and mating history on fecundity and fertilization success in the hide beetle. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 271:1311–1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones TM, Balmford A, Quinnell RJ (2000) Adaptive female choice for middle-aged mates in a lekking sandfly. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 267:681–686

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keller LF, Waller DM (2002) Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol 17:230–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp DJ (2002) Butterfly contests and flight physiology: why do older males fight harder? Behav Ecol 13:456–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick KM, Hinton MP, Atkins K, Haupt MA, Skinner JD (1998) Mothers determine sexual preferences. Nature 395:659–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko H (1997) Evolutionarily stable strategies of age-dependent sexual advertisement. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:99–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko H, Ots I (2006) When not to avoid inbreeding. Evolution 60:467–475

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin X, Aars J, Piertney SB (2001) Dispersal, intraspecific competition, kin competition and kin facilitation: a review of the empirical evidence. In: Clobert J, Danchin E, Dhondt AA, Nichols JD (eds) Dispersal. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 110–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Boeuf BJ, Reiter J (1988) Lifetime reproductive success in northern elephant seals. In: Clutton-Brock TH (ed) Reproductive success. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 344–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Lihoreau M, Zimmer C, Rivault C (2007) Kin recognition and incest avoidance in a group-living insect. Behav Ecol 18:880–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marden JH, Wagge JK (1990) Escalated damselfly territorial contests are energetic wars of attrition. Anim Behav 39:954–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masters KL (1997) Behavioral and ecological aspects of inbreeding in natural animal populations: Inferences from Umbonia treehoppers (Homoptera: Membracidae). Ph.D. Princeton University, Princeton, p 311

  • McKamey SH, Deitz LL (1996) Generic revision of the New World tribe Hoplophorionini (Hemiptera: Membracidae: Mebracinae). Syst Entomol 21:295–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead FW (1962) The thorn bug, Umbonia crassicornis (Amyot and Serville) (Homoptera: Membracidae). Florida Department of Agriculture, Division of Plant Industry, Tallahassee (Entomol Circ 8)

  • Mountjoy DJ, Lemon RE (1996) Female choice for song complexity in the European starling: a field experiment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otronen M (1995) Energy reserves and mating success in males of the yellow dung fly, Scathophaga stercoraria. Funct Ecol 9:683–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer CA, Edmands S (2000) Mate choice in the face of both inbreeding and outbreeding depression in the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus. Mar Biol 136:693–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1979) Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: Blum MS, Blum NA (eds) Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic, New York, pp 123–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Plaistow SJ, Tsubaki Y (2000) A selective trade-off for territoriality and non-territoriality in the polymorphic damselfly Mnais costalis. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 267:696–975

    Google Scholar 

  • Proulx SR, Day T, Rowe L (2002) Older males signal more reliably. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 269:2291–2299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pusey A, Wolf M (1996) Inbreeding avoidance in animals. Trends Ecol Evol 11:201–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riechert SE, Roeloffs RM (1993) Evidence for and consequences of inbreeding in the cooperative spiders. In: Thornhill NW (ed) The natural history of inbreeding and outbreeding: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 283–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Slagsvold T, Hansen BT, Johannessen LE, Lifjeld JT (2002) Mate choice and imprinting in birds studied by cross-fostering in the wild. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 269:1449–1455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava S, Omkar (2004) Age-specific mating and reproductive senescence in the seven-spotted ladybird, Coccinella septempunctata. J Appl Entomol 128:452–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallamy D, Schafer C (1997) Maternal care in the Hemiptera: Ancestry, alternatives, and current adaptive value. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of social behavior in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 94–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill NW (1993) The natural history of inbreeding and outbreeding: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Uetz GW, Norton S (2007) Preference for male traits in female wolf spiders varies with the choice of available males, female age and reproductive state. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:631–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldman B, McKinnon JS (1993) Inbreeding and outbreeding in fishes, amphibians, and reptiles. In: Thornhill NW (ed) The natural history of inbreeding and outbreeding: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 250–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Windsor GL, Innes DJ (2002) Sexual reproduction in Daphnia pulex (Crustacea: Cladocera): observations on male mating behaviour and avoidance of inbreeding. Freshw Biol 47:441–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong B, Candolin U (2005) How is female mate choice affected by male competition? Biol Rev 80:559–571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood TK (1974) Aggregating behavior of Umbonia crassicornis (Homoptera: Membracidae). Can Entomol 106:169–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood TK (1976) Alarm behavior of brooding female Umbonia crassicornis (Homoptera: Membracidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 69:340–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood TK (1993) Diversity in the new world Membracidae. Annu Rev Entomol 38:409–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood TK, Dowell R (1985) Reproductive behavior and dispersal in Umbonia crassicornis (Homoptera: Membracidae). Fla Entomol 68:151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhead AP (1986) Male age: effect on mating behaviour and success in the cockroach Diploptera punctatai. Anim Behav 34:1874–1879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuk M (1988) Parasite load, body size, and age of wild-caught male field crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae): effects of sexual selection. Evolution 42:969–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank R. Snyder for help in designing and constructing the enclosure cages and B. Sonderman for help in maintaining the greenhouse population of U. crassicornis. We also thank L. Bussière, C. Gerhardt, D. Kemp, G. McNett, K. Ramaswamy, R. Rodríguez, J. Schul, R. Semlitsch, and two anonymous reviewers for their comments on the manuscript. M. Ellersieck of the University of Missouri, Department of Statistics, provided statistical advice. This research was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (Canada) postgraduate scholarship to PAD. The experiments performed here comply with the current laws of the USA, the State of Missouri, and the guidelines of the University of Missouri-Columbia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul A. De Luca.

Additional information

Communicated by L. W. Simmons

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Luca, P.A., Cocroft, R.B. The effects of age and relatedness on mating patterns in thornbug treehoppers: inbreeding avoidance or inbreeding tolerance?. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62, 1869–1875 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0616-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0616-2

Keywords

Navigation