Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cuckoo growth performance in parasitized and unused hosts: not only host size matters

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The quality and quantity of food delivered to young are among the major determinants of fitness. A parental provisioning capacity is known to increase with body size. Therefore, brood parasitism provides an opportunity to test the effects of varying provisioning abilities of different-sized hosts on parasitic chick growth and fledging success. Knowledge of growth patterns of common cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, chicks in nests of common hosts is very poor. Moreover, no study to date has focused on any currently unused hosts (i.e., suitable cuckoo host species in which parasitism is currently rare or absent). Here, I compare the growth performance of cuckoo chicks in nests of a common host (the reed warbler, Acrocephalus scirpaceus) and two unparasitized hosts (the song thrush, Turdus philomelos, and the blackbird, Turdus merula). Parasitic chicks were sole occupants of the observed nests, thus eliminating the confounding effect of competition with host chicks. Experiments revealed striking differences in parasitic chick growth in the two closely related Turdus hosts. Cuckoo chicks cross-fostered to song thrush nests grew much quicker and attained much higher mass at fledging than those in nests of their common reed warbler host. Alternatively, parasitic chicks in blackbird nests grew poorly and did not survive until fledging. I discuss these observations with respect to host selection by parasitic cuckoos.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarez F (1994) Rates of weight increase of cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) and host (Cercotrichas galactotes) chicks. Ardeola 41:63–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooke ML, Davies NB (1989) Provisioning of nestling cuckoos Cuculus canorus by reed warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus hosts. Ibis 131:250–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bussmann J (1947) Wachstum und Jugendzeit eines Kuckucks. Ornithol Beob 44:41–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramp S (ed) (1988) The birds of the Western Palearctic. Tyrant flycatchers to thrushes, vol 5. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramp S (ed) (1992) The birds of the Western Palearctic. Warblers, vol 6. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB (1986) Reproductive success of dunnocks, Prunella modularis, in a variable mating system. 1. Factors influencing provisioning rate, nestling weight and fledgling success. J Anim Ecol 55:123–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB (2000) Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats. T & AD Poyser, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB, Brooke ML (1989) An experimental study of co-evolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its hosts. I. Host egg discrimination. J Anim Ecol 58:207–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glassey B, Forbes S (2003) Why brown-headed cowbirds do not influence red-winged blackbird parent behaviour. Anim Behav 65:1235–1246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glue D, Morgan R (1972) Cuckoo hosts in British habitats. Bird Study 19:187–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grim T (1999) Food of great reed warbler (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) young. Sylvia 35:93–99 (in Czech, with summary in English)

    Google Scholar 

  • Grim T (2005a) Host recognition of brood parasites: implications for methodology in studies of enemy recognition. Auk 122:530–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grim T (2005b) Mimicry vs. similarity: which resemblances between brood parasites and their hosts are mimetic and which are not? Biol J Linn Soc 84:69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grim T (2006) The evolution of nestling discrimination by hosts of parasitic birds: why is rejection so rare? Evol Ecol Res 8:785–802

    Google Scholar 

  • Grim T, Honza M (1997) Differences in parental care of reed warbler (Acrocephalus scirpaceus) to its own nestlings and parasitic cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) chicks. Folia Zool 46:135–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Grim T, Honza M (2001a) Differences in behaviour of closely related thrushes (Turdus philomelos and T. merula) to experimental parasitism by the common cuckoo Cuculus canorus. Biologia 56:549–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Grim T, Honza M (2001b) Does supernormal stimulus influence parental behaviour of the cuckoo’s host? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:322–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grim T, Kleven O, Mikulica O (2003) Nestling discrimination without recognition: a possible defence mechanism for hosts towards cuckoo parasitism? Proc R Soc Lond B 270:S73–S75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honza M, Picman J, Grim T, Novak V, Capek M, Mrlik V (2001) How to hatch from an egg of great structural strength: a study of the common cuckoo. J Avian Biol 32:249–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khayutin SN, Dmitrieva LP, Tartygina NG, Aleksandrov LI (1982) The behaviour of a nestling of Cuculus canorus in the nest of Phoenicurus phoenicurus. Zool Z 61:1063–1077 (in Russian with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilner RM (2003) How selfish is a cowbird nestling? Anim Behav 66:569–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilner RM, Davies NB (1999) How selfish is a cuckoo chick? Anim Behav 58:797–808

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kilner RM, Madden JR, Hauber ME (2004) Brood parasitic cowbird nestlings use host young to procure resources. Science 305:877–879

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick AM (2002) Variation in growth of brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater) nestlings and energetic impacts on their host parents. Can J Zool 80:145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleven O, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Honza M (1999) Host species affects the growth rate of cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) chicks. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47:41–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindén M, Gustafsson L, Pärt T (1992) Selection on fledging mass in the collared flycatcher and the great tit. Ecology 73:336–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magrath RD (1991) Nestling weight and juvenile survival in the blackbird Turdus merula. J Anim Ecol 60:335–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magrath RD (1992) Roles of egg mass and incubation pattern in establishment of hatching hierarchies in the blackbird (Turdus merula). Auk 109:474–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin TE (1987) Food as a limit on breeding birds: a life-history perspective. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:453–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Galvez D, Soler M, Soler JJ, Martin-Vivaldi M, Palomino JJ (2005) Food acquisition by common cuckoo chicks in rufous bush robin nests and the advantage of eviction behaviour. Anim Behav 70:1313–1321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moksnes A, Røskaft E (1992) Responses of some rare cuckoo hosts to mimetic cuckoo eggs and foreign conspecific eggs. Ornis Scand 23:17–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moksnes A, Røskaft E (1995) Egg-morphs and host preference in the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus): an analysis of cuckoo and host eggs from European museum collections. J Zool 236:625–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Braa AT, Korsnes L, Lampe HM, Pedersen HC (1990) Behavioural responses of potential hosts towards artificial cuckoo eggs and dummies. Behaviour 116:64–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskát C, Karcza Z, Csörgö T (2003) Egg rejection in European blackbirds (Turdus merula): the effect of mimicry. Ornis Fenn 80:86–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Numerov AD (2003) Interspecific and intraspecific brood parasitism in birds. Federal State Unitary Enterprise Publish & Polygraf Corporation, Voronezh (in Russian, with English summary)

  • Rothstein SI, Robinson SK (1998) Parasitic birds and their hosts. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Saether B-E (1994) Food provisioning in relation to reproductive strategy in altricial birds: a comparison of two hypotheses. Evolution 48:1397–1406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (2000) SAS online document, version 8. SAS, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Soler M (2001) Begging behaviour of nestlings and food delivery by parents: the importance of breeding strategy. Acta Ethol 4:59–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soler M (2002) Breeding strategy and begging intensity: influences on food delivery by parents and host selection by parasitic cuckoos. In: Wright J, Leonard ML (eds) The evolution of begging. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 413–427

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Soler M, Soler JJ (1991) Growth and development of great spotted cuckoos and their magpie hosts. Condor 93:46–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starck JM, Ricklefs RE (eds) (1998) Avian growth and development. Evolution within the altricial–precocial spectrum. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Strausberger BM (1998) Temporal patterns of host availability, brown-headed cowbird brood parasitism, and parasite egg mass. Oecologia 116:267–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland WJ, Newton I, Green RE (2004) Bird ecology and conservation. A handbook of techniques. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Trine CL (1998) Wood thrush population sinks and implications for the scale of regional conservation strategies. Conserv Biol 12:576–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werth I (1947) The growth of a young cuckoo. Br Birds 40:331–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley JW (1986) Growth of shiny cowbird and host chicks. Wilson Bull 98:126–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolfenden BE, Gibbs HL, Sealy SG, McMaster DG (2003) Host use and fecundity of individual female brown-headed cowbirds. Anim Behav 66:95–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyllie I (1981) The cuckoo. Batsford, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Suggestions by three anonymous referees and the associate editor substantially improved this paper. I would like to thank M. E. Hauber, O. Kleven, E. Røskaft and V. Remeš for their comments on earlier versions of the MS. P. Procházka kindly provided some video recordings. I am grateful to all who helped with the fieldwork: A. Dvorská, M. Honza, O. Kleven, B. Matysioková, A. Moksnes, P. Procházka, E. Røskaft, G. Rudolfsen, and V. Šícha. When working on this paper, I was supported by grants from the Research Council of Norway, the Czech Ministry of Education (grants No. 153100012 and No. MSM6198959212), and the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (206/03/D234). No nest was abandoned after the experiments were performed. The experiments were done under license from The Central Commission for Animal Welfare of the Czech Republic (No. 065/2002–V2) and in accordance with the laws and ethical guidelines of the Czech Republic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, Palacký University, tř. Svobody 26, 771 46, Olomouc, Czech Republic

    Tomáš Grim

Authors
  1. Tomáš Grim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomáš Grim.

Additional information

Communicated by M. Soler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grim, T. Cuckoo growth performance in parasitized and unused hosts: not only host size matters. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60, 716–723 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0215-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0215-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation