Skip to main content
Log in

Nectar-receiver behavior in relation to the reward rate experienced by foraging honeybees

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since forager honeybees change their food-unloading behavior according to nectar-source profitability, an experiment was performed in order to analyze whether food-receivers modify their within-hive tasks related to different reward conditions. We offered individual foragers two reward conditions at a rate feeder while an additional feeder offered a constant reward and was of free access to the rest of the hive. Both feeders were the only food sources exploited by the colony during the assays since a flight chamber was used. After receiving nectar, hive bees performed processing cycles that involved several behaviors and concluded when they returned to the delivery area to receive a new food sample. During these cycles, receivers mainly performed oral contacts offering food, or inspected cells, and often both. In the latter case, both behaviors occurred simultaneously and at the same distance from the hive entrance. When they performed a single task, either the occurrence of cell inspections increased or contact offerings decreased for the highest reward rate offered to the donor-forager. Receivers also begged for food more often after interacting with low-profit foragers. Thus, the profitability of the food source exploited by nectar-forager honeybees could affect receiver behaviors within the hives based on individual-to-individual interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1 A
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4A–H

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson C, Ratnieks FLW (1999) Task partitioning in insect societies. I. Effect of colony size on queuing delay and colony ergonomic efficiency. Am Nat 154:521–535

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cassill D (2003) Rules of supply and demand regulate recruitment to food in an ant society. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:441–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Marco RJ, Farina WM (2001) Changes in food source profitability affect the trophallactic and dance behavior of forager honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:441–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Esch HE, Burns JE (1996) Distance estimation by foraging honeybees. J Exp Biol 199:155–162

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farina WM (1996) Food-exchange by foragers in the hive—a means of communication among honeybees? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:59–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farina WM, Núñez JA (1991) Trophallaxis in the honeybee Apis mellifera (L.) as related to the profitability of food sources. Anim Behav 42:389–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Farina WM, Wainselboim AJ (2001a) Changes in the thoracic temperature of honeybees while receiving nectar from foragers collecting at different reward rates. J Exp Biol 204:1653–1658

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farina WM, Wainselboim AJ (2001b) Thermographic recordings show that honeybees receive nectar from foragers even during short trophallactic contacts. Insectes Soc 48:360–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch K von (1967) The dance language and orientation of bees. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass

  • Hart AG, Ratnieks FLW (2001) Why do honeybee (Apis mellifera) foragers transfer nectar to several receivers? Information improvement through multiple sampling in a biological system. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:244–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass

  • Jeanne RL (1986) The evolution of organization of work in social insects. Monit Zool Ital 20:119–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolmes SA (1984) A quantitative comparison of observational methodologies for studies of worker honeybees. J Apic Res 23:189–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Núñez JA (1966) Quantitative Beziehungen zwischen den eingenschaften von Futterquellen und dem verhalten von sammelbienen. Z Vgl Physiol 53:142–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Núñez JA (1970) The relationship between sugar flow and foraging and recruiting behavior of honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). Anim Behav 18:527–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Núñez JA (1974) Metabolism and activity of the worker bee. Proceedings of the 24th Apimondia International Apiarist Congress. Apimondia Ediciones, Buenos Aires

  • Núñez JA (1982) Honeybee foraging strategies at a food source in relation to its distance from the hive and the rate of sugar flow. J Apic Res 21:139–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Park W (1925) The storing and ripening of honey by honeybees. J Econ Entomol 18:405–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley TD (1982) Adaptive significance of the age polyethism schedule in honeybee colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:287–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley TD (1989) Social foraging in honeybee: how nectar foragers assess their colony’s nutritional status. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:181–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley TD (1995) The wisdom of the hive. The social physiology of honeybee colonies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass

  • Seeley TD, Kolmes SA (1991) Age polyethism for hive duties in honeybees—illusion or reality? Ethology 87:284–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley TD, Mikheyev AS, Pagano GJ (2000) Dancing bees tune both duration and rate of waggle-run production in relation to nectar-source profitability. J Comp Physiol A 186:813–819

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stabentheiner A, Hagmüller K (1991) Sweet food means “hot dancing” in honeybees. Naturwissenschaften 78:471–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Tezze AA, Farina WM (1999) Trophallaxis in the honeybee, Apis mellifera L.: the interaction between viscosity and sucrose concentration of the transferred solution. Anim Behav 57:1319–1326

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel S (1983) Ecophysiology of zoophilic pollination. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB, Ziegier H (eds) Physiological plant ecology. III. Encyclopedia of plant physiology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 559–624

  • Waddington KD, Kirchner WH (1992) Acoustical and behavioral correlates of profitability of food source in honey bee round dances. Ethology 92:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainselboim AJ, Farina WM (2000) Trophallaxis in the honeybee Apis mellifera (L.): the interaction between flow of solution and sucrose concentration of the exploited food source. Anim Behav 59:1177–1185

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass

  • Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are deeply indebted to J. Goyret and A. Wainselboim for valuable comments on the original manuscript. We thank R. De Marco and R. Josens for fruitful comments and discussion throughout the study. We thank also C. Farny and P. Reissig for helping us with the English. We thank also R. Moritz and two anonymous referees for their valuable comments on the original manuscript. This study was partially supported by funds from ANPCYT (PICT 98-03103), Fundación Antorchas, the University of Buenos Aires and CONICET (PIP 2049). The present study complies with the current laws of the country in which the experiments were performed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walter M. Farina.

Additional information

Communicated by R.F.A. Moritz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pírez, N., Farina, W.M. Nectar-receiver behavior in relation to the reward rate experienced by foraging honeybees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55, 574–582 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-003-0749-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-003-0749-2

Keywords

Navigation