Abstract
Purpose
To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of two different bone graft materials in the minimally invasive treatment of early and middle stage femoral head necrosis.
Methods
A total of 36 patients (39 hips) with avascular necrosis of the femoral head were divided into autologous iliac bone group (ABG) and bioceramics bone group (BBG). Both groups were treated with minimally invasive thick channel decompression to remove dead bone of femoral head. The ABG was treated with autologous iliac bone graft, and BBG was treated with β-tricalcium phosphate bone graft. The operation time, intra-operative blood loss, haemoglobin, and haematocrit were recorded at three and seven days post-operatively. The clinical efficacy and safety were evaluated by Harris score and imaging examination before, and after treatment and at follow-up stages.
Results
The patients were followed up for 24 to 45 (average 29.27 ± 3.56) months. The BBG was significantly better than the ABG in terms of operation time, intra-operative blood loss, haemoglobin, and haematocrit value at three days. Compared with pre-operative, the Harris score of the two groups at 12 months after operation was significantly improved. The Harris score and the imaging evaluation of the last follow-up exhibited significantly better outcome in BBG than those of ABG.
Conclusion
Bioceramics and autologous iliac bone minimally invasive treatment of early and medium-term femoral head necrosis exhibited satisfactory clinical efficacy in the short and medium-term. The bioceramics graft materials have the advantages of reducing trauma, bleeding, operation time, and quick recovery of post-operative functions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mont MA, Cherian JJ, Sierra RJ et al (2015) Nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: where do we stand today? A ten-year update[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am 7:1604–1627. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.O.00071
Mont MA, Zywiel MG, Marker DR et al (2010) The natural history of untreated asymptomatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a systematic literature review[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(12):2165–2170. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.I.00575
Kang JS, Moon KH, Kwon DG et al (2013) The natural history of asymptomatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head[J]. Int Orthop 37(3):379–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1775-y
Chughtai M, Piuzzi NS, Khlopas A et al (2017) An evidence-based guide to the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head[J]. Bone Joint J 99(10):1267–1279. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B10.BJJ-2017-0233.R2
Cao H, Guan H, Lai Y et al (2015) Review of various treatment options and potential therapies for osteonecrosis of the femoral head[J]. J Orthop Translat 4:57–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2015.09.005
Zhao DW, Yu M, Hu K et al (2015) Prevalence of nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head and its associated risk factors in the Chinese population: results from a nationally representative survey[J]. Chin Med J 128(21):2843–2850. https://doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.168017
Zhao D, Qiu X, Wang B et al (2017) Epiphyseal arterial network and inferior retinacular artery seem critical to femoral head perfusion in adults with femoral neck fractures[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res 75(8):2011–2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-017-5318-5
Pascart T, Falgayrac G, Migaud H et al (2017) Region specific Raman spectroscopy analysis of the femoral head reveals that trabecular bone is unlikely to contribute to non-traumatic osteonecrosis[J]. Sci Rep 7(1):017–00162. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00162-3
Yang S, Wu X, Xu W, Ye S et al (2010) Structural augmentation with biomaterial-loaded allograft threaded cage for the treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis[J]. J Arthroplast 25(8):1223–1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2009.08.019
Nam KW, Kim YL, Yoo JJ et al (2008) Fate of untreated asymptomatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(3):477–484. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.01582
Mont Michael A, Salem Hytham S, Piuzzi Nicolas S et al (2020) Nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: where do we stand today? A 5-year update [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am 102(12):1084–1099. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.01271
Gardeniers JWM, Gosling-Gardeniers AC, Rijnen WHC (2014) The ARCO staging system:generation and evolution since 1991[M]. Osteonecrosis. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 215–218
Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51(4):737–755
Chen X, Tan X, Gao S et al (2015) Sartorius muscle-pedicle bone graft for osteonecrosis of the femoral head[J]. Int Orthop 40(7):1417–1425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2921-5
Moya-Angeler J, Gianakos AL, Villa JC et al (2015) Current concepts on osteonecrosis of the femoral head[J]. World J Orthop 6:590–601. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v6.i8.590
Mont MA, Jones LC, Hungerford DS (2006) Nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: ten years later[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(5):1117–1132. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.01041
Gao F, Han J, He Z et al (2018) Radiological analysis of cystic lesion in osteonecrosis of the femoral head[J]. Int Orthop 42(7):1615–1621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3958-z
Kun-Chi H, Xiong-Gang et al (2019) The efficacy and safety of core decompression for the treatment of femoral head necrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Orthop Surg Res 14(1):306. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1359-7
Lieberman JR, Engstrom SM, Meneghini RM et al (2012) Which factors influence preservation of the osteonecrotic femoral head?[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(2):525–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2050-4
Lei P, Du W, Liu H et al (2019) Free vascularized iliacbone flap based on deep circumflex iliac vessels graft for the treatment of osteonecrosis of femoral head[J]. J Orthop Surg Res 14(1):397. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1440-2
Civinini R, De Biase P, Carulli C et al (2012) The use of an injectable calcium sulphate /calcium phosphate bioceramic in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head[J]. Int Orthop 36(8):1583–1588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1525-6
Wang Q, Donghai L, Yang Z et al (2019) Femoral head and neck fenestration through a direct anterior approach combined with compacted autograft for the treatment of early stage nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a retrospective study.[J]. J Arthroplast 35(3):652–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.10.043
Gao P, Zhang H, Liu Y et al (2016) Beta-tricalcium phosphate granules improve osteogenesis in vitro and establish innovative osteoregenerators for bone tissue engineering in vivo[J]. Sci Rep 6:23367. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23367
Lu Y, Lu X, Li M et al (2018) Minimally invasive treatment for osteonecrosis of the femoral head with angioconductive bioceramic rod. Int Orthop 42:1567–1573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3919-6
Acknowledgments
We thank Juntao Zhang,Dawei Liang, Haonan Ling, Ying Zhang, Youwen Liu, and Xiantao Chen for their assistance in the case collection, data statistical analysis, and the study program design. The sponsors and funders had no role in the inception or design of the study, data collection and analysis, or preparation of this report.
Funding
This study was supported by the medical and health projects of Luoyang science and technology plan (1603004A-8) and the special subject of scientific research on traditional Chinese medicine in Henan Province (2019ZY2081).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, L., Zhang, J., Liang, D. et al. Clinical study on minimally invasive treatment of femoral head necrosis with two different bone graft materials. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 45, 585–591 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04916-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04916-z