Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The beginnings of orthopaedics in Romania

  • Orthopaedic Heritage
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim of the study

To offer a glimpse into the orthopaedic practice in Romania during the nineteenth century and the first decades of the twentieth century, corresponding to a period when this surgical specialty was defining itself.

Introduction

As in other parts of the world, in Romania, the orthopaedics and traumatology specialty derived from the main general surgery core. At the turn of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, Romanian doctors were eager to improve and to further develop the medical practice in their home country and, thus, the development of the orthopaedics and traumatology also benefited from this enthusiasm.

Method

A review of the literature was performed and both the online and offline libraries were searched for specific terms. The resulted data was structured and edited into separate subchapters for each doctor.

Results

Summarized biographic information are presented, covering the most distinguished figures that have helped develop orthopedic surgical branch in Romania. Great doctors such as Carol Davila (1828–1884), Constantin Dumitrescu Severeanu (1840–1930), Ernest Juvara (1870–1933), Ioan (Ion) Ghiulamila (1872–1936), Ion (Iancu) Jianu (1880–1972), and Alexandru D. Rădulescu (1886–1979) are some of the most renowned for laying the foundation and for developing modern orthopaedics and traumatology in Romania.

Discussion

Although up until the late 1860s all doctors practicing in Romania graduated from widely recognized European medical schools, after this period, great surgeons graduated from its own Romanian National Medical School. This led to a blooming development in the surgical and medical field as physicians were competing with each other to bring the best treatments and techniques in medical practice.

Conclusion

Although orthopaedic practice in the early nineteenth century was poorly represented, after sustained reforms and great visionary surgeons, it had rapidly developed into a separate and well-defined surgical specialty by the early twentieth century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Poenaru DV (2000) Istoria ortopediei din Banat. Orizonturi Universitare, Timisoara

    Google Scholar 

  2. Petrescu AD (1974) Deux médecins angevins à Bucarest au XIXe siècle: Charles Davila et Alphonse Lebiez. Hist Sci méd 8(4):849–854

    Google Scholar 

  3. Manea P (2011) Specialişti din afara graniţelor noastre, care au venit în România. Revista de economie si administratie sanitara (57–58):35–42

  4. Romniceanu Gr (1870) Tratat elementariu de anatomia descriptivă. Tomul I. Osteologia. C. Petresco C. & I. Busnea, Bucuresci

  5. Angelescu N, Stãnilescu S (2006) Relatiile chirurgicale româno-franceze. Chirurgia (Buc) 101(5):463–470

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ploscaru C (2011) Chirurgia romaneasca. Curierul de Râmnic. http://www.ramnic.ro/articole/chirurgia-romaneasca-35991/2011-04-27. Accesed 14 Jan 2018

  7. Angelescu N, Popa E (2007) Ecoles chirurgicales roumaines de tradition française. e-mémoires de l’Académie Nationale de. Chirurgie 6(3):23–30

    Google Scholar 

  8. Angelescu N (2006) Constantin Dimitrescu Severeanu (1840-1930). Chirurgia (Buc) 101(1):9–11

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Severeano CD (1893) Nouveau procédé opératoire pour réduire les luxations anciennes de l’humérus. In: Congrès de Chirurgie. Procès-verbaux, memoire et discussions Vol VII. Paris, pp 389–393

  10. Liste des membres titulaires (1889). In: Congres Français de Chirurgie 4e Session Paris 1889. Procès-verbaux, memoire et discussions vol IV. Paris, pp 3–9

  11. Severeano CD (1895) Nouveau procédé de la résection du genou. Rev Chirurg 15:41–44

    Google Scholar 

  12. Juvara E (1921) Procédé de résection de la partie supérieure du tibia avec substitution, á la partie enlevee d'une greffe préleveé sur le fémur. Presse Med 29:241–243

    Google Scholar 

  13. Juvara E (1919) Nouveau procedure pou-la cure radicale du “hallux valgus.”. Nouv Press Med 40:395–397

    Google Scholar 

  14. U. V. M. Surgeon Goes to Rumania (1927) Vermont Alumni Weekly 7(6):8. http://cdi.uvm.edu/collections/item/vermontalumniweeklyv07n06. Accessed 26 Dec 2017

  15. Poirier P, Friteau H, Juvara E (1893) Quinze leçons d’anatomie practique. Ancienne Maison DeLahaye L. Battaille et Cie. Place de L'école-De-Médecine, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  16. Juvara E (1899) Leitfaden für die chirurgische Anatomie. Verlag von August Hirschwald, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  17. Palade R (2005) Ernest Juvara (1870 - 1933). Chirurgia (Buc) 100(3):209–211

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Poenaru DV (2005) Prof. Ioan Jianu: founding member of SICOT. Int Orthop 39(8):1665–1667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2760-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Di Matteo B, Tarabella V, Filardo G, Viganò A, Tomba P, Marcacci M (2014) Postcards from the past: the third SICOT Congress, Bologna 1936. Int Orthop 38(8):1745–1750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2273-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Poenaru D (2005) Momente din istoria ortopediei. Editura Mirton, Timişoara

    Google Scholar 

  21. Brand RA, Mont MA, Manring MM (2011) Biographical sketch: Themistocles Gluck (1853–1942). Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(6):1525–1527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-1836-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Eynon-Lewis NJ, Ferry D, Pearse MF (1992) Themistocles Gluck: an unrecognised genius. BMJ 305:1534–1536

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hernigou P (2013) Earliest times before hip arthroplasty: from John Rhea Barton to Themistocles Glück. Int Orthop 37(11):2313–2318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gluck T (1891) Referat über die durch das moderne chirurgische Experiment gewonnenen positiven Resultate, betreffend die Naht und den Ersatz von Defecten höherer Gewebe, sowie über die Verwethung resorbirbarer und lebendiger Tampons in der Chirurgie. Arch klin chir 41:187–239

    Google Scholar 

  25. Beuran M, Dutescu B (2010) Urgentele chirurgicale în organizarea asistentei medico-sociale a Bucurestiului: etape si semnificatia lor (1906-1990). Chirurgia 105(6):739–743

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Poenaru D (2012) Pagini inedite din istoria ortopediei şi traumatologiei româneşti. Viata Medicala 22(1168) http://www.viata-medicala.ro/*articleID_5308-dArt.html. Accessed 28 Dec 2017

  27. Manea P (2011) Prezența specialiștilor români în domeniul sănătății, atât în implantologie, ortopedie și protezare, cât și în instalarea aparatelor röntgen pentru radiodiagnostic și radioterapie, în perioada celor două războaie mondiale. Revista de economie si administratie sanitara (57–58):43

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan V. Poenaru.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Poenaru, D.V., Oprea, M.D. The beginnings of orthopaedics in Romania. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 42, 2715–2724 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4009-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4009-5

Keywords

Navigation