Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Minimally invasive treatment for osteonecrosis of the femoral head with angioconductive bioceramic rod

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To describe the rationale, the surgical technique, and the short-term follow-up results of a new minimally invasive treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) with an angioconductive bioceramic rod (ABR) implant.

Methods

Sixty-two patients (72 hips) with ARCO stage IIA-IIIC ONFH treated with the minimally invasive ABR from January 2012 to December 2016 were reviewed (17 females, 45 males, mean age 44.49). This technique used the angioconductive properties of the porous implant to repair the necrosis by driving vascularization from the trochanter to the necrotic area. Patients had a mean follow-up period of 26.74 months. The outcomes were evaluated by hip joint survival, radiograph, and the Harris Hip Score (HHS). The complications occurred during the treatment period were recorded.

Results

No serious post-operative complications occurred during the treatment. The overall joint survival rate was 90.27%, with seven conversions to THA. Improvements were observed in 23 (31.95%) hips, 24 (33.33%) hips remained stable, and 25 (34.72%) hips had worse results according to the radiographic evaluation. The mean HHS at the end follow-up significantly improved compared to the pre-operative mean HHS (82.27 vs 58.14, p < 0.001). In both radiographic evaluation and HHS, the treatment was more effective on patients beneath 44 years old (p < 0.05); ARCO stage II compared to stage III (p < 0.05); and China-Japan Friendship Hospital (CJFH) type C compared to CJFH type L (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The minimally invasive treatment of ONFH with ABR showed promising results in delaying or even terminating the progression of the necrosis and improving hip function, especially in younger patients and in the early stages of the disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cooper C, Steinbuch M, Stevenson R et al (2010) The epidemiology of osteonecrosis: findings from the GPRD and THIN databases in the UK. Osteoporosis Int 21(4):569–577

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu TG, Chen WH (2009) Research progress of epidemiology about non-traumatic osteonecrosis of femoral head. Med Recapitulate 15(17):2637–2639

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liu F, Wang W, Yang L et al (2017) An epidemiological study of etiology and clinical characteristics in patients with nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Res Med Sci 22(1):15

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhao DW, Yu M, Kai H et al (2015) Prevalence of nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head and its associated risk factors in the Chinese population: results from a nationally representative survey. Natl Med J Chin 128(21):2843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Atsumi T, Kuroki Y (1992) Role of impairment of blood supply of the femoral head in the pathogenesis of idiopathic osteonecrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 277(277):22–30

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zlotorowicz M, Czubak J, Caban A et al (2013) The blood supply to the femoral head after posterior fracture/dislocation of the hip, assessed by CT angiography. Bone Joint J 95-B(11):1453–1457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao D, Qiu X, Wang B et al (2017) Epiphyseal arterial network and inferior retinacular artery seem critical to femoral head perfusion in adults with femoral neck fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475(8):2011–2023

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith DW (1997) Is avascular necrosis of the femoral head the result of inhibition of angiogenesis? Med Hypothesis 49(6):497–500

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bai F, Wang Z, Lu J et al (2010) The correlation between the internal structure and vascularization of controllable porous bioceramic materials in vivo: a quantitative study. Tissue Eng Part A 16(12):3791–3803

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Xiao X, Wang W, Liu D et al (2015) The promotion of angiogenesis induced by three-dimensional porous beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold with different interconnection sizes via activation of PI3K/Akt pathways. Sci Rep-UK 5(1):1–11

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Li ZR, Liu ZH, Sun W et al (2012) The classification of osteonecrosis of the femoral head based on the three pillars structure: China-Japan Friendship Hospital (CJFH) classification. Chin J Orthop 32(6):515–520

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mont MA, Cherian JJ, Sierra RJ et al (2015) Nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: where do we stand today? J Bone Joint Surg Am 97(19):1604–1627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Plakseychuk AY, Kim SY, Park BC et al (2003) Vascularized compared with nonvascularized fibular grafting for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85(4):589–596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mont MA, Etienne G, Ragland PS (2003) Outcome of nonvascularized bone grafting for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417(417):84–92

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liu ZH, Guo WS, Li ZR et al (2014) Porous tantalum rods for treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Genet Mol Res 13(4):8342–8352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang Q, Zhang H, Qijia LI et al (2015) Biocompatibility and osteogenic properties of porous tantalum. Exp Ther Med 9(3):780–786

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Crnogorac-Jurcevic T, Chelala C, Barry S et al (2013) Porous tantalum rod in treating early-stage avascular necrosis of the femoral head: application and issues. Chin J Tissue Eng Res 17(52):9062–9068

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang C, Zeng B, Xu Z et al (2005) Treatment of femoral head necrosis with free vascularized fibula grafting: a preliminary report. Microsurgery 25(4):305–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kawate K, Yajima H, Sugimoto K et al (2007) Indications for free vascularized fibular grafting for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 8(1):78–85

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ligh CA, Nelson JA, Fischer JP et al (2017) The effectiveness of free vascularized fibular flaps in osteonecrosis of the femoral head and neck: a systematic review. J Reconstr Microsurg 33(03):163–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gao YS, Liu XL, Sheng JG et al (2013) Unilateral free vascularized fibula shared for the treatment of bilateral osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Arthroplast 28(3):531–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao D, Xie H, Xu Y et al (2017) Management of osteonecrosis of the femoral head with pedicled iliac bone flap transfer: a multicenter study of 2190 patients. Microsurgery 37(8):896–901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mont MA, Jones LC, Hungerford DS (2006) Nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: ten years later. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(5):1117–1132

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Landgraeber S, Theysohn JM, Classen T et al (2013) Advanced core decompression, a new treatment option of avascular necrosis of the femoral head—a first follow-up. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 7(11):893–900

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the Shanghai Technology Innovation project (No. 15441902800).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhen Wang or Jianxi Lu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, Y., Lu, X., Li, M. et al. Minimally invasive treatment for osteonecrosis of the femoral head with angioconductive bioceramic rod. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 42, 1567–1573 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3919-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3919-6

Keywords

Navigation