Abstract
Purpose
To describe the rationale, the surgical technique, and the short-term follow-up results of a new minimally invasive treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) with an angioconductive bioceramic rod (ABR) implant.
Methods
Sixty-two patients (72 hips) with ARCO stage IIA-IIIC ONFH treated with the minimally invasive ABR from January 2012 to December 2016 were reviewed (17 females, 45 males, mean age 44.49). This technique used the angioconductive properties of the porous implant to repair the necrosis by driving vascularization from the trochanter to the necrotic area. Patients had a mean follow-up period of 26.74 months. The outcomes were evaluated by hip joint survival, radiograph, and the Harris Hip Score (HHS). The complications occurred during the treatment period were recorded.
Results
No serious post-operative complications occurred during the treatment. The overall joint survival rate was 90.27%, with seven conversions to THA. Improvements were observed in 23 (31.95%) hips, 24 (33.33%) hips remained stable, and 25 (34.72%) hips had worse results according to the radiographic evaluation. The mean HHS at the end follow-up significantly improved compared to the pre-operative mean HHS (82.27 vs 58.14, p < 0.001). In both radiographic evaluation and HHS, the treatment was more effective on patients beneath 44 years old (p < 0.05); ARCO stage II compared to stage III (p < 0.05); and China-Japan Friendship Hospital (CJFH) type C compared to CJFH type L (p < 0.05).
Conclusions
The minimally invasive treatment of ONFH with ABR showed promising results in delaying or even terminating the progression of the necrosis and improving hip function, especially in younger patients and in the early stages of the disease.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cooper C, Steinbuch M, Stevenson R et al (2010) The epidemiology of osteonecrosis: findings from the GPRD and THIN databases in the UK. Osteoporosis Int 21(4):569–577
Liu TG, Chen WH (2009) Research progress of epidemiology about non-traumatic osteonecrosis of femoral head. Med Recapitulate 15(17):2637–2639
Liu F, Wang W, Yang L et al (2017) An epidemiological study of etiology and clinical characteristics in patients with nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Res Med Sci 22(1):15
Zhao DW, Yu M, Kai H et al (2015) Prevalence of nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head and its associated risk factors in the Chinese population: results from a nationally representative survey. Natl Med J Chin 128(21):2843
Atsumi T, Kuroki Y (1992) Role of impairment of blood supply of the femoral head in the pathogenesis of idiopathic osteonecrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 277(277):22–30
Zlotorowicz M, Czubak J, Caban A et al (2013) The blood supply to the femoral head after posterior fracture/dislocation of the hip, assessed by CT angiography. Bone Joint J 95-B(11):1453–1457
Zhao D, Qiu X, Wang B et al (2017) Epiphyseal arterial network and inferior retinacular artery seem critical to femoral head perfusion in adults with femoral neck fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475(8):2011–2023
Smith DW (1997) Is avascular necrosis of the femoral head the result of inhibition of angiogenesis? Med Hypothesis 49(6):497–500
Bai F, Wang Z, Lu J et al (2010) The correlation between the internal structure and vascularization of controllable porous bioceramic materials in vivo: a quantitative study. Tissue Eng Part A 16(12):3791–3803
Xiao X, Wang W, Liu D et al (2015) The promotion of angiogenesis induced by three-dimensional porous beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold with different interconnection sizes via activation of PI3K/Akt pathways. Sci Rep-UK 5(1):1–11
Li ZR, Liu ZH, Sun W et al (2012) The classification of osteonecrosis of the femoral head based on the three pillars structure: China-Japan Friendship Hospital (CJFH) classification. Chin J Orthop 32(6):515–520
Mont MA, Cherian JJ, Sierra RJ et al (2015) Nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: where do we stand today? J Bone Joint Surg Am 97(19):1604–1627
Plakseychuk AY, Kim SY, Park BC et al (2003) Vascularized compared with nonvascularized fibular grafting for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85(4):589–596
Mont MA, Etienne G, Ragland PS (2003) Outcome of nonvascularized bone grafting for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417(417):84–92
Liu ZH, Guo WS, Li ZR et al (2014) Porous tantalum rods for treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Genet Mol Res 13(4):8342–8352
Wang Q, Zhang H, Qijia LI et al (2015) Biocompatibility and osteogenic properties of porous tantalum. Exp Ther Med 9(3):780–786
Crnogorac-Jurcevic T, Chelala C, Barry S et al (2013) Porous tantalum rod in treating early-stage avascular necrosis of the femoral head: application and issues. Chin J Tissue Eng Res 17(52):9062–9068
Zhang C, Zeng B, Xu Z et al (2005) Treatment of femoral head necrosis with free vascularized fibula grafting: a preliminary report. Microsurgery 25(4):305–309
Kawate K, Yajima H, Sugimoto K et al (2007) Indications for free vascularized fibular grafting for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 8(1):78–85
Ligh CA, Nelson JA, Fischer JP et al (2017) The effectiveness of free vascularized fibular flaps in osteonecrosis of the femoral head and neck: a systematic review. J Reconstr Microsurg 33(03):163–172
Gao YS, Liu XL, Sheng JG et al (2013) Unilateral free vascularized fibula shared for the treatment of bilateral osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Arthroplast 28(3):531–536
Zhao D, Xie H, Xu Y et al (2017) Management of osteonecrosis of the femoral head with pedicled iliac bone flap transfer: a multicenter study of 2190 patients. Microsurgery 37(8):896–901
Mont MA, Jones LC, Hungerford DS (2006) Nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: ten years later. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(5):1117–1132
Landgraeber S, Theysohn JM, Classen T et al (2013) Advanced core decompression, a new treatment option of avascular necrosis of the femoral head—a first follow-up. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 7(11):893–900
Funding
This study was supported by the Shanghai Technology Innovation project (No. 15441902800).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lu, Y., Lu, X., Li, M. et al. Minimally invasive treatment for osteonecrosis of the femoral head with angioconductive bioceramic rod. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 42, 1567–1573 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3919-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3919-6