Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of intramedullary nail, plate, and external fixation in the treatment of distal tibia nonunions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to examine time to union of extra-articular distal tibia nonunions based on fracture type and fixation methods: intramedullary nail (IMN), plate osteosynthesis (PO), and external fixation (EF).

Methods

This retrospective chart review included all patients who presented at a Level I trauma center with AO/OTA 43A & distal third 42A-C fracture nonunions between 2008 and 2014. Fixation methods were recorded and patient course was followed until nonunion had healed clinically.

Results

Thirty-three distal tibia nonunions were included, and 29 reached eventual union (88%). Five AO/OTA fracture types were present. Mean times to union from nonunion diagnosis between original fracture types were compared (p = 0.203). Comminuted fracture types had longer times to union from nonunion diagnosis compared to simple fracture types (78 vs. 46 weeks, p = 0.051) and more revision fixations (1.5 vs. 0.5, p = 0.037). Mean time to union from nonunion diagnosis was shorter when no revision fixation was done compared to revisions (15 vs. 42 weeks, p = 0.102). Times to union from nonunion diagnosis without revision fixation were: IMN (12 weeks), PO (27 weeks), and EF (13 weeks) (p = 0.202). Times to union from definitive revision fixation were: IMN (17 weeks), PO (21 weeks), and EF (66 weeks) (p = 0.009), with EF taking significantly longer than both other methods. 21 patients (64%) underwent revision fixation. Revision fail rates were: IMN (0/6, 0%), PO (2/8, 25%), and EF (15/21, 71%). Time to union was longer in revisions that changed fixation method compared to revisions that used the same method (51 vs. 18 weeks, p = 0.030). Deep infections were also associated with longer union times (81 vs. 47 weeks, p = 0.040).

Conclusions

In this nonunion population, comminuted fracture types needed more time and revisions to reach union. Time to union was only clinically shorter when revision fixation was not performed, but IMN and PO were both successful fixation options with significantly shorter times to union than EF. Mean time to union increased even more when revision of fixation method was performed vs. exchange revision, as did nonunions with deep infections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tay WH, de Steiger R, Richardson M, Gruen R, Balogh ZJ (2014) Health outcomes of delayed union and nonunion of femoral and tibial shaft fractures. Injury 45:1653–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Joveniaux P, Ohl X, Harisboure A et al (2010) Distal tibia fractures: management and complications of 101 cases. Int Orthop 34:583–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Piatkowski K, Piekarczyk P, Kwiatkowski K, Przybycien M, Chwedczuk B (2015) Comparison of different locking plate fixation methods in distal tibia fractures. Int Orthop 39:2245–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tarkin IS, Siska PA, Zelle BA (2010) Soft tissue and biomechanical challenges encountered with the management of distal tibia nonunions. Orthop Clin N Am 41:119–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Avilucea FR, Sathiyakumar V, Greenberg SE et al (2015) Open distal tibial shaft fractures: a retrospective comparison of medial plate versus nail fixation. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 42(1):101–106

  6. Reed LK, Mormino MA (2008) Distal tibia nonunions. Foot Ankle Clin 13:725–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fong K, Truong V, Foote CJ et al (2013) Predictors of nonunion and reoperation in patients with fractures of the tibia: an observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Discord 14:103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kruppa CG, Hoffmann MF, Sietsema DL, Mulder MB, Jones CB (2015) Outcomes after intramedullary nailing of distal tibial fractures. J Orthop Trauma 29:e309–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tsang ST, Mills LA, Frantzias J, Baren JP, Keating JF, Simpson AH (2016) Exchange nailing for nonunion of diaphyseal fractures of the tibia: our results and an analysis of the risk factors for failure. Bone Joint J 98-B:534–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sugaya H, Mishima H, Aoto K et al (2014) Percutaneous autologous concentrated bone marrow grafting in the treatment for nonunion. Eur J Orthop Surg Tr 24:671–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cabrolier J, Molina M (2015) Is intramedullary nailing superior to plating in patients with extraarticular fracture of the distal tibia? Med Chem Commun 15:e6306

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fadel M, Ahmed MA, Al-Dars AM et al (2015) Ilizarov external fixation versus plate osteosynthesis in the management of extra-articular fractures of the distal tibia. Int Orthop 39:513–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Iqbal HJ, Pidikiti P (2013) Treatment of distal tibia metaphyseal fractures; plating versus intramedullary nailing: a systematic review of recent evidence. Foot Ankle Surg 19:143–147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vallier HA, Le TT, Bedi A (2008) Radiographic and clinical comparisons of distal ribia shaft fractures (4 to 11 cm proximal to the plafond): plating versus intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma 22:207–311

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vallier HA, Cureton BA, Patterson BM (2011) Randomized, prospective comparison of plate versus intramedullary nail fixation for distal tibia shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 25:736–741

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kwok CS, Crossman PT, Loizou CL (2014) Plate versus nail for distal tibial fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma 28:542–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mao Z, Wang G, Zhang L et al (2015) Intramedullary nailing versus plating for distal tibia fractures without articular involvement: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 10:95

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang QX, Gao FQ, Sun W, Wang YT, Yang YR, Li Z (2015) Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis versus open reduction and internal fixation for distal tibial fractures in adults: a meta-analysis. Zhongguo Gu Shang 28:757–62

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhou Y, Wang Y, Liu L, Zhou Z, Cao X (2015) Locking compression plate as an external fixator in the treatment of closed distal tibial fractures. Int Orthop 39:2227–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yu Y, Yu KH, Chen Y et al (2014) Comparison of three fixation methods for the treatment of tibial fractures in adolescents. Zhongguo Gu Shang 27:874–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shah SB, Mishra AK, Chalise P, Shah RK, Singh RP, Shrivatava MP (2014) Outcome of treatment of nonunion tibial shaft fracture by intramedullary interlocking nail augmentated with autogenous cancellous bone graft. Nepal Med Coll J 16:58–62

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lonner JH, Koval KJ, Golyakhovsky V, Frankel VH (1995) Posttraumatic nonunion of the distal tibial metaphysis-Treatment using the Ilizarov circular external fixator. Am J Orthop Suppl 16–21

  23. Xu K, Fu X, Li YM, Wang CG, Li ZJ (2014) A treatment for large defects of the tibia caused by infected nonunion: ilizarov method with bone segment extension. Irish J Med Sci 183:423–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao X, Wang PF, Zhang YT, Zhang CC, Xu SG, Zhang X (2014) Advanced bone graft combined with locking compression plate for the treatment of middle and distal tibia nonunion. Zhongguo Gu Shang 27:1008–11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schoenleber SJ, Hutson JJ Jr (2015) Treatment of hypertrophic distal tibia nonunion and early malunion with callus distraction. Foot Ankle Int 36:400–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J et al (2007) Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: orthopaedic trauma association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma 21(10):S1–S163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. IBM Corp (2012) IBM SPSS statistics for macintosh, version 21.0. IBM Corp, Armonk

    Google Scholar 

  28. Metsemakers WJ, Roels N, Belmans A, Reynders P, Nijs S (2015) Risk factors for nonunion after intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures: remaining controversies. Injury 46:1601–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Braly HL, O’Connor DP, Brinker MR (2013) Percutaneous autologous bone marrow injection in the treatment of distal meta-diaphyseal tibial nonunions and delayed unions. J Orthop Trauma 27:527–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zelle BA, Bhandari M, Espiritu M, Koval KJ, Zlowodzki M (2006) Treatment of distal tibia fractures without articular involvement: a systematic review of 1125 fractures. J Orthop Trauma 20:76–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sathiyakumar V, Thakore RV, Ihejirika RC, Obremskey WT, Sethi MK (2014) Distal tibia fractures and medial plating: factors influending re-operation. Int Orthop 38:1483–8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Richmond J, Colleran K, Borens O, Kloen P, Helfet DL (2004) Nonunions of the distal tibia treated by reamed intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma 18:603–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Paraschou S, Bekir H, Anastasopoulos H et al (2009) Evaluation of interlocking intramedullary nailing in distal tibial fractures and nonunions. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 43:472–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wu CC (2011) Single-stage surgical treatment of infected nonunion of the distal tibia. J Orthop Trauma 25:156–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Megas P, Saridis A, Kouzelis A, Kallivokas A, Mylonas S, Tyllianakis M (2010) The treatment of infected nonunion of the tibia following intramedullary nailing by the Ilizarov method. Injury 41:294–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Litrenta J, Tornetta P 3rd, Vallier H et al (2015) Dynamizations and exchanges: success rates and indications. J Orthop Trauma 29:569–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Swanson EA, Garrard EC, O’Connor DP, Brinker MR (2015) Results of a systematic approach to exchange nailing for the treatment of aseptic tibial nonunions. J Orthop Trauma 29:28–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toledo Medical Center, 3065 Arlington Avenue, Toledo, OH, 43614, USA

    Jiayong Liu

Authors
  1. Nabil A. Ebraheim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brad Evans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaochen Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mina Tanios
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marshall Gillette
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jiayong Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiayong Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

There is no funding source.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the institutional review board. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ebraheim, N.A., Evans, B., Liu, X. et al. Comparison of intramedullary nail, plate, and external fixation in the treatment of distal tibia nonunions. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 41, 1925–1934 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3432-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3432-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation