Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Which AO/OTA 31-A2 pertrochanteric fractures can be treated with a dynamic hip screw without developing a lateral wall fracture? A CT-based study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine whether radiographic measurements derived from standard computed tomography (CT) evaluation can be used to predict likelihood of a peri-operative lateral femoral wall fracture in AO/OTA 31-A2 pertrochanteric fractures treated with a dynamic hip screw (DHS).

Methods

Fifty-one patients with AO/OTA 31-A2 classified pertrochanteric fractures were evaluated using a pre-operative CT scan of the pelvis with both hips. Dimensions of the lateral wall were calculated for each patient using four parameters: (1) height of the lateral wall above the vastus ridge; (2) circumference of the lateral wall 2 cm below the vastus ridge at an angle of 135°; this circumference was further divided into an anterior, lateral and posterior component; (3) cortical thickness at the centre of the lateral component of the lateral wall; and (4) cortical index. All patients were treated with a 135° DHS. Postoperative radiographs were assessed for lateral femoral wall fracture.

Results

Patients with a lateral wall fracture (17/51) had a smaller circumference (4.47 cm vs 5.44 cm p value <0.001) as well as a lower height of the lateral femoral wall (1.37 cm vs 2.21 p value < 0.001). Analysis of the three components of the circumference revealed a significant difference for the anterior component only and not for the lateral and posterior components. There was no statistical difference in the cortical thickness or cortical index in the two groups. The cutoff values for height of the lateral wall and anterior component were calculated using ROC curves and found to be 1.68 cm (AUC 0.918) and 2.10 cm (AUC 0.851) respectively.

Conclusion

AO/OTA 31-A2 pertrochanteric fractures with a lateral wall height of > 1.68 cm and an anterior component of > 2.10 cm in circumference are not likely to sustain a lateral wall fracture when treated with a DHS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barton TM, Gleeson R, Topliss C et al (2010) A comparison of the long Gamma nail with the sliding hip screw for the treatment of AO/OTA 31-A2 fractures of the proximal part of the femur: a prospective randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:792–798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gotfried Y (2004) The lateral trochanteric wall: a key element in the reconstruction of unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 425:82–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Langford J, Pillai G, Ugliailoro AD, Yang E (2011) Perioperative lateral trochanteric wall fractures: sliding hip screw versus percutaneous compression plate for intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Orthop Trauma 25:191–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Palm H, Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Hip fracture study group (2007) Integrity of the lateral femoral wall in intertrochanteric hip fractures: an important predictor of a reoperation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:470–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Im G, Shin YW, Song YJ (2005) Potentially unstable intertrochanteric fractures. J Orthop Trauma 19:5–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Park SY, Park J, Rhee DJ et al (2007) Anterior or posterior obliquity of the lag screw in the lateral view—does it affect the sliding characteristics on unstable trochanteric fractures? Injury 38:785–791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hsu CE, Shih CM, Wang CC, Huang KC (2013) Lateral femoral wall thickness: a reliable predictor of post-operative lateral wall fracture in intertrochanteric fractures. Bone Joint J 95-B:1134–1138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Boopalan PR, Oh JK, Kim TY et al (2012) Incidence and radiologic outcome of intraoperative lateral wall fractures in OTA 31A1 and A2 fractures treated with cephalomedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma 26:638–642

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bong MR, Patel V, Iesaka K, Egol KA, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ (2004) Comparison of a sliding hip screw with a trochanteric lateral support plate to an intramedullary hip screw for fixation of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures: a cadaver study. J Trauma 56:791–794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang CY, Yew CW (2012) Clinical results of unstable intertrochanteric fracture treated by dynamic hip screw with tension band wire reinforcement. Formos J Musculoskelet Disord 03:99–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cavaignac E, Lecoq M, Ponsot A et al (2013) CT scan does not improve the reproducibility of trochanteric fracture classification: a prospective observational study of 53 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99:46–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lavelle DG (2007) Fractures and dislocations of the hip. In: Canale ST, Beaty JH (eds) Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics, 11th edn. Mosby Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 3237–3309

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haidukewych GJ, Israel TA, Berry DJ (2001) Reverse obliquity fractures of the intertrochanteric region of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:643–650

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM et al (1995) The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1058–1064

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Andruszkow H, Frink M, Frömke C et al (2012) Tip apex distance, hip screw placement, and neck shaft angle as potential risk factors for cut-out failure of hip screws after surgical treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Int Orthop 36:2347–2354

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Pervez H, Parker MJ, Pryor GA, Lutchman L, Chirodian N (2002) Classification of trochanteric fracture of the proximal femur: a study of the reliability of current systems. Injury 33:713–715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sah AP, Thornhill TS, LeBoff MS, Glowacki J (2007) Correlation of plain radiographic indices of hip with quantitative bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int 18:1119–1126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Yun HH, Yi JW, Lim DS, Park SC, Oh SR (2011) Reliability of the radiologic measurement methods for assessment of osteoporosis using the digital hip radiograph. J Korean Hip Soc 23:142–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Im GI, Park PG, Moon SW (2012) The relationship between radiological parameters from plain hip radiographs and bone mineral density in a Korean population. J Bone Miner Metab 30:504–508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen F, Wang Z, Bhattacharyya T (2014) Absence of femoral cortical thickening in long-term bisphosphonate users: implications for atypical femur fractures. Bone 62:64–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Koeppen VA, Schilcher J, Aspenberg P (2012) Atypical fractures do not have a thicker cortex. Osteoporos Int 23:2893–2896

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Baumgärtner R, Heeren N, Quast D, Babst R, Brunner A (2015) Is the cortical thickness index a valid parameter to assess bone mineral density in geriatric patients with hip fractures? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135:805–810

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

    Gaurav Sharma, Ravijot Singh, Kiran Kumar GN, Vaibhav Jain, Ankit Gupta, Kamran Farooque & Vijay Sharma

  2. Department of Radiology, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

    Shivanand Gamanagatti

Authors
  1. Gaurav Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ravijot Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kiran Kumar GN
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vaibhav Jain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ankit Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shivanand Gamanagatti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kamran Farooque
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Vijay Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaurav Sharma.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 292 kb)

ESM 2

(PDF 546 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, G., Singh, R., GN, K. et al. Which AO/OTA 31-A2 pertrochanteric fractures can be treated with a dynamic hip screw without developing a lateral wall fracture? A CT-based study. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 40, 1009–1017 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2835-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2835-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation