Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of multidisciplinary pain treatment can be predicted without elaborate questionnaires

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Low back pain is one of the most common and expensive diseases of Western societies. Psychosocial factors such as low social status, depression, or work dissatisfaction are known to promote chronicity of low back pain. With a multidisciplinary approach, better outcomes can be achieved than with purely biomedical treatment. Optimal patient selection for multidisciplinary therapy reduces costs and labour. This study investigated whether elaborated questionnaires exceed simple items in predicting multimodal therapy success.

Methods

In this prospective longitudinal clinical study, 330 patients were followed up for six months after multidisciplinary therapy. We applied the patient questionnaire Heidelberg Short Early Risk Assessment Questionnaire for the Prediction of Chronicity in Low Back Pain (HKF-R10) that is approved and established for predicting chronicity in patients with acute low back pain to forecast the therapeutic outcome. Outcome criteria were QOL, pain reduction and back to work.

Results

With regard to outcome criteria, the HKF-R10 was unable to anticipate therapeutic success, but education level, depression, best pain condition, and helplessness predicted therapy success with an 80 % probability for QOL improvement.

Conclusions

It is not necessary to confront patients with an extensive and complicated questionnaire to predict the outcome of multidisciplinary therapy. In fact, assessing a few specific items allows better and easier prognosis estimation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schmidt CO, Raspe H, Pfingsten M et al (2007) Back pain in the German adult population: prevalence, severity, and sociodemographic correlates in a multiregional survey. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(18):2005–2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McBeth J, Jones K (2007) Epidemiology of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 21(3):403–425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schiltenwolf M, Buchner M, Heindl B, von Reumont J, Muller A, Eich W (2006) Comparison of a biopsychosocial therapy (BT) with a conventional biomedical therapy (MT) of subacute low back pain in the first episode of sick leave: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Spine J 15(7):1083–1092

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gobel H (2001) Epidemiology and costs of chronic pain syndromes exemplified by specific and unspecific low back pain. Schmerz 15(2):92–98

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hicks GS, Duddleston DN, Russell LD, Holman HE, Shepherd JM, Brown CA (2002) Low back pain. Am J Med Sci 324(4):207–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schneider S, Schmitt H, Zoller S, Schiltenwolf M (2005) Workplace stress, lifestyle and social factors as correlates of back pain: a representative study of the German working population. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 78(4):253–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vlaeyen JW, Linton SJ (2000) Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art. Pain 85(3):317–332

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pfingsten M, Leibing E, Franz C, Bansemer D, Busch O, Hildebrandt J (1997) Fear-avoidance-beliefs in patients with backpain. Schmerz 11(6):387–395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. van Tulder MW, Koes B, Malmivaara A (2006) Outcome of non-invasive treatment modalities on back pain: an evidence-based review. Eur Spine J 15(Suppl 1):S64–S81

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Neubauer E, Junge A, Pirron P, Seemann H, Schiltenwolf M (2006) HKF-R 10 - screening for predicting chronicity in acute low back pain (LBP): a prospective clinical trial. Eur J Pain 10(6):559–566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Von KM, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, Dworkin SF (1992) Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 50(2):133–149

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hasenbring M, Marienfeld G, Kuhlendahl D, Soyka D (1994) Risk factors of chronicity in lumbar disc patients. A prospective investigation of biologic, psychologic, and social predictors of therapy outcome. Spine 19(24):2759–2765

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Main CJ (1983) The modified somatic perception questionnaire (MSPQ). J Psychosom Res 27(6):503–514

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Waddell G (1992) Biopsychosocial analysis of low back pain. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol 6(3):523–557

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fahrenberg J, Hampel R, Selg H (1980) Das Freiburger Persönlichkeitsinventar. Hogrefe Verlag. Magazine Article

  16. Schade V, Semmer N, Main CJ, Hora J, Boos N (1999) The impact of clinical, morphological, psychosocial and work-related factors on the outcome of lumbar discectomy. Pain 80(1–2):239–249

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stratford PW, Binkley J, Solomon P, Finch E, Gill C, Moreland J (1996) Defining the minimum level of detectable change for the Roland-Morris questionnaire. Phys Ther 76(4):359–365

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zung WW, Richards CB, Short MJ (1985) Self-rating depression scale in an outpatient clinic. Further validation of the SDS. Arch Gen Psychiatry 13:508–515, 1-1-1985. Magazine Article

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Buchner M, Neubauer E, Zahlten-Hinguranage A, Schiltenwolf M (2007) The influence of the grade of chronicity on the outcome of multidisciplinary therapy for chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(26):3060–3066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lambeek LC, Anema JR, van Royen BJ et al (2007) Multidisciplinary outpatient care program for patients with chronic low back pain: design of a randomized controlled trial and cost-effectiveness study [ISRCTN28478651]. BMC Public Health 7:254

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lang E, Eisele R, Jankowsky R et al (2000) Ergebnisqualität in der ambulanten Versorgung von Patienten mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen. Schmerz 14(3):146–159, Magazine Article

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Linton SJ, Hallden K (1998) Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain. Clin J Pain 14(3):209–215

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Keeley P, Creed F, Tomenson B, Todd C, Borglin G, Dickens C (2008) Psychosocial predictors of health-related quality of life and health service utilisation in people with chronic low back pain. Pain 135(1–2):142–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Underwood MR, Morton V, Farrin A (2007) Do baseline characteristics predict response to treatment for low back pain? Secondary analysis of the UK BEAM dataset [ISRCTN32683578]. Rheumatology (Oxford) 46(8):1297–1302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. van der Hulst M, Vollenbroek-Hutten MM, Ijzerman MJ (2005) A systematic review of sociodemographic, physical, and psychological predictors of multidisciplinary rehabilitation-or, back school treatment outcome in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(7):813–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tong HC, Geisser ME, Ignaczak AP (2006) Ability of early response to predict discharge outcomes with physical therapy for chronic low back pain. Pain Pract 6(3):166–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dionne CE, Le SN, Franche RL, Dorval M, Bombardier C, Deyo RA (2011) Five questions predicted long-term, severe, back-related functional limitations: evidence from three large prospective studies. J Clin Epidemiol 64(1):54–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University Clinic for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany

    Christian Alexander Fischer, Eva Neubauer, Marcus Schiltenwolf & Haili Wang

  2. Morges, CH, Morges, Switzerland

    Hanne S. Adams

Authors
  1. Christian Alexander Fischer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eva Neubauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hanne S. Adams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marcus Schiltenwolf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Haili Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Alexander Fischer.

Appendix

Appendix

HKF-R 10

This questionnaire serves to better understand your pain and modify our therapy. Please answer the following questions.

figure afigure a

HKF-R 10-Analysis

figure bfigure b

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fischer, C.A., Neubauer, E., Adams, H.S. et al. Effects of multidisciplinary pain treatment can be predicted without elaborate questionnaires. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 38, 617–626 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2156-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2156-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation