References
Hu J, Qu J, Xu D, Zhou J, Lu H (2012) Allograft versus autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an up-to-date meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-012-1720-5 [Epub ahead of print]
Lawhorn KW, Howell SM, Traina SM, Gottlieb JE, Meade TD, Freedberg HI (2012) The effect of graft tissue on anterior cruciate ligament outcomes: a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing autograft hamstrings with fresh-frozen anterior tibialis allograft. Arthroscopy 28:1079–1086
Noh JH, Yi SR, Song SJ, Kim SW, Kim W (2011) Comparison between hamstring autograft and free tendon Achilles allograft: minimum 2-year follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using EndoButton and Intrafix. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:816–822
Sun K, Tian SQ, Zhang JH, Xia CS, Zhang CL, Yu TB (2009) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft. Arthroscopy 25:750–759
Sun K, Zhang J, Wang Y, Xia C, Zhang C, Yu T, Tian S (2011) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with hamstring tendon autograft and fresh-frozen allograft: a prospective, randomized controlled study. Am J Sports Med 39:1430–1438
Furukawa TA, Barbui C, Cipriani A, Brambilla P, Watanabe N (2006) Imputing missing standard deviations in meta-analyses can provide accurate results. J Clin Epidemiol 59:7–10
Carey JL, Dunn WR, Dahm DL, Zeger SL, Spindler KP (2009) A systematic review of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft compared with allograft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:2242–2250
Mohtadi NG, Chan DS, Dainty KN, Whelan DB (2011) Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(9):CD005960.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hu, J., Qu, J., Xu, D. et al. Reply to comment on Hu et al. “Allograft versus autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an up-to-date meta-analysis of prospective studies”. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 37, 775–776 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1806-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1806-8