Skip to main content
Log in

Reply to comment on Hu et al. “Allograft versus autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an up-to-date meta-analysis of prospective studies”

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Hu J, Qu J, Xu D, Zhou J, Lu H (2012) Allograft versus autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an up-to-date meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-012-1720-5 [Epub ahead of print]

  2. Lawhorn KW, Howell SM, Traina SM, Gottlieb JE, Meade TD, Freedberg HI (2012) The effect of graft tissue on anterior cruciate ligament outcomes: a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing autograft hamstrings with fresh-frozen anterior tibialis allograft. Arthroscopy 28:1079–1086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Noh JH, Yi SR, Song SJ, Kim SW, Kim W (2011) Comparison between hamstring autograft and free tendon Achilles allograft: minimum 2-year follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using EndoButton and Intrafix. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:816–822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sun K, Tian SQ, Zhang JH, Xia CS, Zhang CL, Yu TB (2009) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft. Arthroscopy 25:750–759

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sun K, Zhang J, Wang Y, Xia C, Zhang C, Yu T, Tian S (2011) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with hamstring tendon autograft and fresh-frozen allograft: a prospective, randomized controlled study. Am J Sports Med 39:1430–1438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Furukawa TA, Barbui C, Cipriani A, Brambilla P, Watanabe N (2006) Imputing missing standard deviations in meta-analyses can provide accurate results. J Clin Epidemiol 59:7–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carey JL, Dunn WR, Dahm DL, Zeger SL, Spindler KP (2009) A systematic review of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft compared with allograft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:2242–2250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mohtadi NG, Chan DS, Dainty KN, Whelan DB (2011) Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(9):CD005960.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongbin Lu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hu, J., Qu, J., Xu, D. et al. Reply to comment on Hu et al. “Allograft versus autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an up-to-date meta-analysis of prospective studies”. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 37, 775–776 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1806-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1806-8

Keywords

Navigation