Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The utility of CT and MRI in detecting male urethral recurrence after radical cystectomy

  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the utility of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting male urethral recurrence (UR).

Materials and methods

Between December 2008 and March 2016, 12 men (age range 61–85 years; median, 74 years) with urethral bloody discharge or pain were histologically confirmed as UR after radical cystectomy due to urothelial carcinoma. Of these patients, eight underwent both CT and MRI. The remaining four patients underwent CT only. CT and MRI were compared regarding UR detection rate. CT and MRI were also evaluated to determine which modality was more accurate for depicting UR. UR detection rate of each MRI sequence were recorded. Standard reference was biopsy or urethrectomy in 11 patients and size change in one patient after treatment.

Results

UR detection rate with CT was 41.7% (5/12), while that with MRI was 100% (8/8) (p = 0.0147). Of the eight patients who were diagnosed UR with MRI, six were detected with MRI alone and two with both MRI and CT (p = 0.0313). UR detection rates of T2-weighted, T1-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and contrast-enhanced MRI were 87.5% (7/8), 62.5% (5/8), 100% (5/5), and 87.5% (7/8), respectively.

Conclusion

MRI is superior to CT in detecting male URs in symptomatic patients after radical cystectomy. T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and contrast-enhanced MRI sequences are useful for detecting male UR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stenzl A, Bartsch G, Rogatsch H (2002) The remnant urothelium after reconstructive bladder surgery. Eur Urol 41:124–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boorjian SA, Kim SP, Weight CJ, et al. (2011) Risk factors and outcomes of urethral recurrence following radical cystectomy. Eur Urol 60:1266–1272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan Y, Fisher P, Tilki D, Evans CP (2016) Urethral recurrence after cystectomy: current preventative measures, diagnosis and management. BJU Int 117:563–569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mazzonetto M, De Antoni M, Veronese F, Lavelli D (1991) Cystectomy and internal urinary diversion in bladder neoplasm. Role of CT in the follow-up. Radiol Med 82:308–314 (308 pages over)

  5. Dhar NB, Jones JS, Reuther AM, et al. (2008) Presentation, location and overall survival of pelvic recurrence after radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. BJU Int 101:969–972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shinagare AB, Sadow CA, Silverman SG (2013) Surveillance of patients with bladder cancer following cystectomy: yield of CT urography. Abdom Imaging 38:1415–1421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sung DJ, Kim YH, Cho SB, et al. (2006) Obliterative urethral stricture: MR urethrography vs. conventional retrograde urethrography with voiding cystourethrography. Radiology 240:842–848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Osman Y, El-Ghar MA, Mansour O, Refaie H, El-Diasty T (2006) Magnetic resonance urethrography in comparison to retrograde urethrography in diagnosis of male urethral strictures: is it clinically relevant? Eur Urol 50:587–593; discussion 594

  9. Park BK, Kim CK, Lee SW (2010) Evaluation of anterior urethral stricture using thick slab SSFSE MR urethrography. Acta Radiol 51:1157–1162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ryu J, Kim B (2001) MR imaging of the male and female urethra. Radiographics 21:1169–1185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim B, Kawashima A, LeRoy AJ (2007) Imaging of the male urethra. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 28:258–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stewart SB, Leder RA, Inman BA (2010) Imaging tumors of the penis and urethra. Urol Clin North Am 37:353–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Varol C, Thalmann GN, Burkhard FC, Studer UE (2004) Treatment of urethral recurrence following radical cystectomy and ileal bladder substitution. J Urol 172:937–942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Katzberg RW, Haller C (2006) Contrast-induced nephrotoxicity: clinical landscape. Kidney Int 69:S3–S7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Roberts DR, Lindhorst SM, Welsh CT, et al. (2016) High levels of gadolinium deposition in the skin of a patient with normal renal function. Invest Radiol 51:280–289

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim CK, Park BK, Lee HM, Kwon GY (2007) Value of diffusion-weighted imaging for the prediction of prostate cancer location at 3T using a phased-array coil: preliminary results. Invest Radiol 42:842–847

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Park BK, Lee HM, Kim CK, Choi HY, Park JW (2008) Lesion localization in patients with a previous negative transrectal ultrasound biopsy and persistently elevated prostate specific antigen level using diffusion-weighted imaging at three Tesla before rebiopsy. Invest Radiol 43:789–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. El-Assmy A, Abou-El-Ghar ME, Refaie HF, Mosbah A, El-Diasty T (2012) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in follow-up of superficial urinary bladder carcinoma after transurethral resection: initial experience. BJU Int 110:E622–627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Takeuchi M, Sasaki S, Naiki T, et al. (2013) MR imaging of urinary bladder cancer for T-staging: a review and a pictorial essay of diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 38:1299–1309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byung Kwan Park.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was waived because of retrospective design.

Informed consent

Statement of informed consent was not applicable since the manuscript does not contain any patient data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, J.J., Park, B.K. The utility of CT and MRI in detecting male urethral recurrence after radical cystectomy. Abdom Radiol 42, 2521–2526 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1159-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1159-7

Keywords

Navigation