Abstract
Objective
To retrospectively evaluate the conventional and functional (diffusion- or perfusion-weighted) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging features of ovarian fibroma, fibrothecoma, and thecoma.
Materials and Methods
Histologically proven ovarian fibromas (n = 19), fibrothecomas (n = 7), and thecomas (n = 2) were reviewed (26 patients). The morphologic and signal intensity (SI) characteristics on conventional MR imaging (n = 28, all cases) were analyzed. The b 1000 signal intensity on diffusion-weighted image (DWI) (n = 22) and the time-to-signal intensity curve on perfusion-weighted image (PWI) (n = 7) were also analyzed. The presence and shape of the ipsilateral ovarian tissue surrounding the lesions were evaluated on T2-weighted image.
Results
Twenty-two cases (79%) were predominantly solid tumor. Majority of the detected lesions exhibited the characteristic homogeneous low SI on T1- (24/28, 86%) and T2- (19/28, 68%) weighted image. Conversely, a number of lesions exhibited high SI (9/28, 32%) on T2-weighted image. Most lesions presented with a detectable ipsilateral ovary on T2-weighted image (24/28, 86%). Tumors larger than 6 cm more likely showed atypical morphology (mixed solid and cystic, cystic), atypical SI (high on T1- and T2-weighted image), and large amount ascites. Larger tumor group (>6 cm) was more likely diagnosed as fibrothecoma or thecoma than fibroma by pathology. On DWI, 16 lesions showed low b 1000 signal intensity (16/22, 73%). On PWI, all lesions showed curve type 1 or 2 (7/7, 100%), which tends to characterize benign lesions. All (16/16, 100%) pre-menopausal women had a detectable ipsilateral ovary, and six (60%) out of 10 post-menopausal women had a detectable ipsilateral ovary (p < 0.05).
Conclusions
Combining conventional morphologic and signal intensity characteristics with the findings from DWI or PWI might help differentiate ovarian fibroma, fibrothecoma, and thecoma from ovarian malignancy, although further prospective larger scale study using DWI and PWI is needed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Troiano RN, Lazzarini KM, Scoutt LM, et al. (1997) Fibroma and fibrothecoma of the ovary: MR imaging findings. Radiology 204:795–798
Valentini AL, Gui B, Micco M, et al. (2012) Benign and suspicious ovarian masses-mr imaging criteria for characterization: pictorial review. J Oncol 2012:481806
Imaoka I, Wada A, Kaji Y, et al. (2006) Developing an MR imaging strategy for diagnosis of ovarian masses. Radiographics 26:1431–1448
Shinagare AB, Meylaerts LJ, Laury AR, Mortele KJ (2012) MRI features of ovarian fibroma and fibrothecoma with histopathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:W296–W303
Ueda J, Furukawa T, Higashino K, et al. (1998) Ovarian fibroma of high signal intensity on T2-weighted MR image. Abdom Imaging 23:657–658
Minutoli F, Blandino A, Gaeta M, et al. (2001) Twisted ovarian fibroma with high signal intensity on T1-weighted MR image: a new sign of torsion of ovarian tumors? Eur Radiol 11:1151–1154
Kitajima K, Kaji Y, Sugimura K (2008) Usual and unusual MRI findings of ovarian fibroma: correlation with pathologic findings. Magn Reson Med Sci 7:43–48
Thomassin-Naggara I, Bazot M, Darai E, et al. (2008) Epithelial ovarian tumors: value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and correlation with tumor angiogenesis. Radiology 248:148–159
Thomassin-Naggara I, Darai E, Cuenod CA, et al. (2009) Contribution of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for predicting benignity of complex adnexal masses. Eur Radiol 19:1544–1552
Thomassin-Naggara I, Toussaint I, Perrot N, et al. (2011) Characterization of complex adnexal masses: value of adding perfusion- and diffusion-weighted MR imaging to conventional MR imaging. Radiology 258:793–803
Suprabha Sharma RB, Upreti Sanjay, Khare Anjali, Sharma Sangeeta, Agarwal Deepti (2013) Ovarian fibrothecoma with extensive cystic degeneration: two case reports. Indian J Clin Pract 23:840–841
Li X, Zhang W, Zhu G, et al. (2012) Imaging features and pathologic characteristics of ovarian thecoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 36:46–53
Bakir B, Bakan S, Tunaci M, et al. (2011) Diffusion-weighted imaging of solid or predominantly solid gynaecological adnexial masses: is it useful in the differential diagnosis? Br J Radiol 84:600–611
Zhang H, Zhang GF, Wang TP, Zhang H (2013) Value of 3.0 T diffusion-weighted imaging in discriminating thecoma and fibrothecoma from other adnexal solid masses. J Ovarian Res 6(1):58
Thomassin-Naggara I, Darai E, Nassar-Slaba J, et al. (2007) Value of dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for distinguishing between ovarian fibroma and subserous uterine leiomyoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:236–242
Oh SN, Rha SE, Byun JY, et al. (2008) MRI features of ovarian fibromas: emphasis on their relationship to the ovary. Clin Radiol 63:529–535
Tamai K, Koyama T, Saga T, et al. (2006) MR features of physiologic and benign conditions of the ovary. Eur Radiol 16:2700–2711
Hillaby K, Aslam N, Salim R, et al. (2004) The value of detection of normal ovarian tissue (the ‘ovarian crescent sign’) in the differential diagnosis of adnexal masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23:63–67
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chung, B.M., Park, S.B., Lee, J.B. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging features of ovarian fibroma, fibrothecoma, and thecoma. Abdom Imaging 40, 1263–1272 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0257-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0257-z