Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gastroduodenal ulcers on CT: forgotten, but not gone

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To estimate the incidence of missed gastroduodenal ulcers on routine abdominal computed tomography (CT) and identify findings and methods to improve sensitivity of CT interpretation for peptic ulcers.

Materials and methods

This is a retrospective chart and imaging review. Two blinded readers independently reviewed CTs performed within 7 days prior to endoscopy of 114 subjects; this included 57 consecutive subjects with proven gastroduodenal ulcers intermixed with 57 subjects with endoscopically normal examinations. Presence, location and size of ulcer crater, and ancillary findings (mural edema, asymmetric wall thickening, focal fat stranding, regional lymph nodes, and extraluminal gas) were recorded before and after review of multiplanar reformatted images. Radiology reports were then reviewed to determine if an ulcer was identified prospectively.

Results

Thirty-one ulcers (54%) were radiographically occult, missed by both readers. Thirteen ulcers were correctly and independently identified by both readers (sensitivity/specificity = 30%/100%). With review of multiplanar reformats, sensitivity and accuracy increased for both readers. When two or more ancillary findings were identified, the odds ratio of a true ulcer being present was greater than 5.6 (P = 0.0001). Both size and location of ulcer were important for detection; readers were more likely to identify gastric ulcers compared to duodenal or marginal ulcers (P = 0.02). Only 3/13 definitely visible ulcers were correctly identified during initial CT interpretation.

Conclusions

Although CT has low sensitivity for peptic ulcer disease, the miss rate for visible peptic ulcers is high. Increased awareness, multiplanar imaging review, and identification of ancillary findings may improve sensitivity for gastroduodenal ulcers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kurata JH, Nogawa AN (1997) Meta-analysis of risk factors for peptic ulcer. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, Helicobacter pylori, and smoking. J Clin Gastroenterol 24(1):2–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Malfertheiner P, Chan FK, McColl KE (2009) Peptic ulcer disease. Lancet 374(9699):1449–1461. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60938-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O’Morain C, et al. (2007) Current concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection: the Maastricht III Consensus Report. Gut 56(6):772–781. doi:10.1136/gut.2006.101634

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marshall BJ, Warren JR (1984) Unidentified curved bacilli in the stomach of patients with gastritis and peptic ulceration. Lancet 1(8390):1311–1315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lau JY, Sung J, Hill C, et al. (2011) Systematic review of the epidemiology of complicated peptic ulcer disease: incidence, recurrence, risk factors and mortality. Digestion 84(2):102–113. doi:10.1159/000323958

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Committee ASoP, Banerjee S, Cash BD, et al. (2010) The role of endoscopy in the management of patients with peptic ulcer disease. Gastrointest Endosc 71(4):663–668. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2009.11.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jacobs JM, Hill MC, Steinberg WM (1991) Peptic ulcer disease: CT evaluation. Radiology 178(3):745–748. doi:10.1148/radiology.178.3.1994412

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaye MD, Young SW, Hayward R, Castellino RA (1980) Gastric pseudotumor on CT scanning. AJR Am J Roentgenol 135(1):190–193. doi:10.2214/ajr.135.1.190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fishman EK, Urban BA, Hruban RH (1996) CT of the stomach: spectrum of disease. Radiographics 16(5):1035–1054. doi:10.1148/radiographics.16.5.8888389

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gossios KJ, Tsianos EV, Demou LL, et al. (1991) Use of water or air as oral contrast media for computed tomographic study of the gastric wall: comparison of the two techniques. Gastrointest Radiol 16(4):293–297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Horton KM, Fishman EK (1998) Helical CT of the stomach: evaluation with water as an oral contrast agent. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171(5):1373–1376. doi:10.2214/ajr.171.5.9798881

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Winter TC, Ager JD, Nghiem HV, et al. (1996) Upper gastrointestinal tract and abdomen: water as an orally administered contrast agent for helical CT. Radiology 201(2):365–370. doi:10.1148/radiology.201.2.8888224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Broder JS, Hamedani AG, Liu SW, Emerman CL (2013) Emergency department contrast practices for abdominal/pelvic computed tomography-a national survey and comparison with the american college of radiology appropriateness criteria(®). J Emerg Med 44(2):423–433. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.08.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Laituri CA, Fraser JD, Aguayo P, et al. (2011) The lack of efficacy for oral contrast in the diagnosis of appendicitis by computed tomography. J Surg Res 170(1):100–103. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2011.02.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Paulson EK, Jaffe TA, Thomas J, Harris JP, Nelson RC (2004) MDCT of patients with acute abdominal pain: a new perspective using coronal reformations from submillimeter isotropic voxels. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183(4):899–906. doi:10.2214/ajr.183.4.1830899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Paulson EK, Harris JP, Jaffe TA, Haugan PA, Nelson RC (2005) Acute appendicitis: added diagnostic value of coronal reformations from isotropic voxels at multi-detector row CT. Radiology 235(3):879–885. doi:10.1148/radiol.2353041231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Horton KM, Fishman EK (2003) Current role of CT in imaging of the stomach. Radiographics 23(1):75–87. doi:10.1148/rg.231025071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pickhardt PJ, Asher DB (2003) Wall thickening of the gastric antrum as a normal finding: multidetector CT with cadaveric comparison. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181(4):973–979. doi:10.2214/ajr.181.4.1810973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Scatarige JC, DiSantis DJ (1989) CT of the stomach and duodenum. Radiol Clin N Am 27(4):687–706

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hammerman AM, Mirowitz SA, Susman N (1989) The gastric air-fluid sign: aid in CT assessment of gastric wall thickening. Gastrointest Radiol 14(2):109–112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

We have no financial disclosures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian C. Allen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Allen, B.C., Tirman, P., Tobben, J.P. et al. Gastroduodenal ulcers on CT: forgotten, but not gone. Abdom Imaging 40, 19–25 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0190-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0190-1

Keywords

Navigation