Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of CT colonography vs. conventional colonoscopy in mapping the segmental location of colon cancer before surgery

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Once presence of a colorectal cancer has been diagnosed, a key factor for patient's prognosis in view of surgical intervention is the correct segmental localization and resection of the tumor. The aim of this work was to compare the accuracy of the current gold standard technique, conventional colonoscopy (CC), to computed tomography colonography (CTC) in the segmental localization of tumor. Sixty-five patients (mean age 64; 45 female and 19 male) with colorectal cancer diagnosed at colonoscopy underwent CTC before surgery. In 45 out of 65 cases (69%), patients were referred to CTC after incomplete CC. Reasons were patient intolerance to CC or presence of stenosing cancer, with consistent difficulties in crossing the tract of the colon involved by the lesion. CTC allowed the complete colonic examination in 63/65 cases, since in 2 patients with an obstructing lesion of the sigmoid colon, pneumocolon could not be obtained. However, per patient and per lesion sensitivity of CTC was 100%. Difference from colonoscopy was statistically significant (P < 0.05). In terms of segmental localization of masses, CTC located precisely all lesions, while colonoscopy failed in 16/67 (24%) lesions, though six were missed for incomplete colonoscopy (9%). In the remaining 10/67 (15%) lesions, detected by colonoscopy but incorrectly located, the mismatch occurred in the rectum (n = 3), sigmoid (n = 2), descending (n = 1), transverse (n = 2), ascending colon, and cecum. Agreement between CTC and CC was fair (k value 0.62). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of CTC in determining the precise location of colonic masses were respectively 100%, 96%, 85%, and 100%. CT detected hepatic (6/65 patients) and lung metastases (3/65 patients). CT colonography has better performance in the identification of colonic masses (diameter > 3 cm), in the completion of colonic evaluation and in the segmental localization of tumor. CTC should replace colonoscopy for preoperative staging of colorectal cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Longo WE, Johnson FE (2002) The preoperative assessment and postoperative surveillance of patients with colon and rectal cancer. Surg Clin North Am 82(5):1091–1108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dekker E, van Gulik T (2005) Colorectal cancer: what the clinician wants to know. Cancer Imaging 5(Spec No A):S127–S132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nesbitt C, Glendinning RJ, Byrne C, Poston GJ (2007) Factors that influence treatment strategies in advanced colorectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 33(Suppl 2):S88–S94

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sjo OH, Lunde OC, Nygaard K, Sandvik L, Nesbakken A (2008) Tumour location is a prognostic factor for survival in colonic cancer patients. Colorectal Dis 10(1):33–40

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kimura T, Iwagaki H, Fuchimoto S, Hizuta A, Orita K (1994) Synchronous colorectal carcinomas. Hepatogastroenterology 41(5):409–412

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tate JJ, Rawlinson J, Royle GT, Brunton FJ, Taylor I (1988) Pre-operative or postoperative colonic examination for synchronous lesions in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 75(10):1016–1018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Isabel-Martinez L, Chapman AH, Hall RI (1988) The value of a barium enema in the investigation of patients with rectal carcinoma. Clin Radiol 39(5):531–533

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Larach SW, et al. (1997) Complications of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: analysis and comparison of early vs latter experience. Dis Colon Rectum 40:592–596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vignati P, Welch JP, Cohen JL (1994) Endoscopic localization of colon cancers. Surg Endosc 8(9):1085–1087

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Piscatelli N, Hyman N, Osler T (2005) Localizing colorectal cancer by colonoscopy. Arch Surg 140(10):932–935

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim SH, Milsom JW, Church JM, et al. (1997) Perioperative tumor localization for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 11(10):1013–1016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Frager DH, Frager JD, Wolf EL, Beneventano TC (1987) Problems in the colonoscopic localization of tumors: continued value of the barium enema. Gastrointest Radiol 12(4):343–346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hilliard G, Ramming K, Thompson J Jr, Passaro E Jr (1990) The elusive colonic malignancy. A need for definitive preoperative localization. Am Surg 56(12):742–744

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Otchy D, Hyman NH, Simmang C, et al. (2004) Practice parameters for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 47(8):1269–1284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Copel L, Sosna J, Kruskal JB, et al. (2007) CT colonography in 546 patients with incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology 244(2):471–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Neri E, Giusti P, Battolla L, et al. (2002) Colorectal cancer: role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology 223(3):615–619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fenlon HM, McAneny DB, Nunes DP, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT (1999) Occlusive colon carcinoma: virtual colonoscopy in the preoperative evaluation of the proximal colon. Radiology 210(2):423–428

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Burling D, Bassett P, Bartram CI (2005) Intra-individual comparison of patient acceptability of multidetector-row CT colonography and double-contrast barium enema. Clin Radiol 60(2):207–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, et al. (2003) Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. Radiology 227(2):378–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rockey DC, et al. (2005) Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 365(9456):305–311

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ, et al. (2004) Comparison of the relative sensitivity of CT colonography and double-contrast barium enema for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2(4):314–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, et al. (2005) CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 236:3–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Otchy D, Hyman NH, Simmang C, et al. (2004) Practice parameters for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1268–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pawlik TM, Scoggins CR, Zorzi D, et al. (2005) Effect of surgical margin status on survival and site of recurrence after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. Ann Surg 241(5):715–722 (discussion 722–4)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kirchgatterer A, Steiner P, Hubner D, et al. (2005) Colorectal cancer in geriatric patients: endoscopic diagnosis and surgical treatment. World J Gastroenterol 11(3):315–318

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Oliva MR, Saini S (2004) Liver cancer imaging: role of CT, MRI, US and PET. Cancer Imaging 4 Spec No A:S42–S46

  27. Agrawal N, Fowler AL, Thomas MG (2006) The routine use of intra-operative ultrasound in patients with colorectal cancer improves the detection of hepatic metastases. Colorectal Dis 8(3):192–194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hough DM, Malone DE, Rawlinson J, et al. (1994) Colon cancer detection: an algorithm using endoscopy and barium enema. Clin Radiol 49(3):170–175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. AGA Clinical Practice Economics Committee (2006) Position of the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute on computed tomographic colonography. Gastroenterology 131(5):1627–1628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cass OW, Freeman ML, Peine CJ, Zera RT, Onstad GR (1993) Objective evaluation of endoscopy skills during training. Ann Intern Med 118(1):40–44

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wexner SD, Garbus JE, Singh JJ, SAGES Colonoscopy Study Outcomes Group (2001) A prospective analysis of 13,580 colonoscopies. Reevaluation of credentialing guidelines. Surg Endosc 15(3):251–261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Pisa, UO Radiodiagnostica 1 Universitaria, Ospedale Cisanello, Via Paradisa 2, 56100, Pisa, Italy

    Emanuele Neri, Francesca Turini, Francesca Cerri, Lorenzo Faggioni, Paola Vagli & Carlo Bartolozzi

  2. Department of Surgery, University of Pisa, Ospedale Cisanello, Via Paradisa 2, 56100, Pisa, Italy

    Gabriele Naldini

Authors
  1. Emanuele Neri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francesca Turini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Francesca Cerri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lorenzo Faggioni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Paola Vagli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Gabriele Naldini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Carlo Bartolozzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emanuele Neri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neri, E., Turini, F., Cerri, F. et al. Comparison of CT colonography vs. conventional colonoscopy in mapping the segmental location of colon cancer before surgery. Abdom Imaging 35, 589–595 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-009-9570-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-009-9570-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation