Abstract
Background
MR colonography (MRC) is a non-invasive method of examining the colon, but it is still only used in a few specialized centers on a daily basis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of MRC with improved fecal tagging vs. conventional colonoscopy (CC).
Methods
Between March 2006 and February 2007, consecutive patients who received first-time referrals to CC were asked to participate in the study. Two days prior to MRC, a new contrast mixture (barium/ferumoxsil) was ingested together with four meals each day. Standard bowel cleansing was performed before CC. MRC was evaluated by two blinded observers. MRC results were compared with CC.
Results
A total of 56 patients were included. The per-polyp sensitivity was 85.7% for polyps 6–10 mm and 81.3% for polyps >10 mm. The per-patient sensitivity/specificity was 100%/80% for polyps >6 mm and 100%/91.4% for polyps >10 mm.
Conclusion
MRC showed acceptable per-patient sensitivities, but the per-polyp sensitivities are still compromised by the fecal tagging. MRC may be implemented, but at the present time MRC with fecal tagging is not ready for widespread use, although it remains a very promising diagnostic tool.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Stryker SJ, Wolff BG, Culp CE, et al. (1987) Natural history of untreated colonic polyps. Gastroenterology 93(5):1009–1013
Leslie A, Carey FA, Pratt NR, et al. (2002) The colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Br J Surg 89(7):845–860
Ristvedt SL, McFarland EG, Weinstock LB, et al. (2003) Patient preferences for CT colonography, conventional colonoscopy, and bowel preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 98(3):578–585
Svensson MH, Svensson E, Lasson A, et al. (2002) Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology 222(2):337–345
Lauenstein T, Holtmann G, Schoenfelder D, et al. (2001) MR colonography without colonic cleansing: a new strategy to improve patient acceptance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177(4):823–827
Ajaj W, Lauenstein TC, Pelster G, et al. (2004) MR colonography: how does air compare to water for colonic distention? J Magn Reson Imaging 19(2):216–221
Morrin MM, Hochman MG, Farrell RJ, et al. (2001) MR colonography using colonic distention with air as the contrast material: work in progress. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176(1):144–146
So NM, Lam WW, Mann D, et al. (2003) Feasibility study of using air as a contrast medium in MR colonography. Clin Radiol 58(7):555–559
Bielen DJ, Bosmans HT, De Wever LL, et al. (2005) Clinical validation of high-resolution fast spin-echo MR colonography after colon distention with air. J Magn Reson Imaging 22(3):400–405
Lam WW, Leung WK, Wu JK, et al. (2004) Screening of colonic tumors by air-inflated magnetic resonance (MR) colonography. J Magn Reson Imaging 19(4):447–452
Lauenstein TC, Debatin JF (2002) Magnetic resonance colonography with fecal tagging: an innovative approach without bowel cleansing. Top Magn Reson Imaging 13(6):435–444
Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, Maris T, et al. (2003) MR colonography with fecal tagging: comparison between 2D turbo FLASH and 3D FLASH sequences. Eur Radiol 13(3):448–452
Goehde SC, Descher E, Boekstegers A, et al. (2005) Dark lumen MR colonography based on fecal tagging for detection of colorectal masses: accuracy and patient acceptance. Abdom Imaging 30(5):576–583
Florie J, Jensch S, Nievelstein RA, et al. (2007) MR colonography with limited bowel preparation compared with optical colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Radiology 243(1):122–131
Kuehle CA, Langhorst J, Ladd SC, et al. (2007) Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing: a prospective cross sectional study in a screening population. Gut 56(8):1079–1085
Saar B, Meining A, Beer A, et al. (2007) Prospective study on bright lumen magnetic resonance colonography in comparison with conventional colonoscopy. Br J Radiol 80(952):235–241
Achiam MP, Chabanova E, Logager V, et al. (2007) Implementation of MR colonography. Abdom Imaging 32(4):457–462
Achiam M, Chabanova E, Løgager V, Andersen LPH, Thomsen HS, Rosenberg J (2008) MR Colonography with fecal tagging: Barium vs. barium ferumoxsil. Acad Radiol 15(5):576–583
Ajaj W, Pelster G, Treichel U, et al. (2003) Dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography: comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal pathology. Gut 52(12):1738–1743
Lauenstein TC, Goehde SC, Ruehm SG, et al. (2002) MR colonography with barium-based fecal tagging: initial clinical experience. Radiology 223(1):248–254
Meier C, Wildermuth S (2002) Feasibility and potential of MR-Colonography for evaluating colorectal cancer. Swiss Surg 8(1):21–24
Pappalardo G, Polettini E, Frattaroli FM, et al. (2000) Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions. Gastroenterology 119(2):300–304
Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Wildermuth S, et al. (2000) Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography. Radiology 216(2):383–388
Weishaupt D, Patak MA, Froehlich J, et al. (1999) Faecal tagging to avoid colonic cleansing before MRI colonography. Lancet 354(9181):835–836
Ajaj W, Lauenstein TC, Schneemann H, et al. (2005) Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing using oral and rectal stool softeners (fecal cracking)–a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 15(10):2079–2087
Lauenstein TC, Herborn CU, Vogt FM, et al. (2001) Dark lumen MR-colonography: initial experience. Rofo 173(9):785–789
Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349(23):2191–2200
Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC, et al. (2004) Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 291(14):1713–1719
Goehde SC, Ajaj W, Lauenstein T, et al. (2004) Impact of diet on stool signal in dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography. J Magn Reson Imaging 20(2):272–278
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Achiam, M.P., Løgager, V.B., Chabanova, E. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of MR colonography with fecal tagging. Abdom Imaging 34, 483–490 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-008-9402-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-008-9402-x