Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Do all non-calcified echogenic renal lesions found on ultrasound need further evaluation with CT?

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This is a study using Evidence Based Practice (EBP) technique to evaluate if non-calcified renal lesions detected with ultrasound, suspected to represent an angiomyolipoma (AML), need a CT to rule out a renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Methods

The secondary and primary literature were searched for all relevant information. This was appraised for validity and strength. The results from the papers with the highest level of evidence were grouped together and analyzed.

Results

Three papers in the primary literature constituted the highest level of evidence. In total these three papers examined 220 lesions. The prevalence of AML was 45% in this sample. Overall, hyperechoic non-calcified renal lesions had a sensitivity of 0.99 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97–1.00), a specificity of 0.43 (95% CI 0.34–0.51), a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.58 and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.98 for AMLs. 57.4% of RCCs were hyperechoic to renal parenchyma. Two of the studies found that posterior acoustic shadowing had a sensitivity of 0.34 (95% CI 0.40–0.56) and a specificity of 1.0 (95% CI 1.0–1.0) for AML.

Conclusions

From the surprisingly limited evidence available in the literature, it must be concluded that all non-calcified echogenic renal lesions detected with ultrasound need a CT to rule out an RCC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Staunton M (2007) Evidence-based radiology: Steps 1 and 2—asking answerable questions and searching for evidence. Radiology 242(1):23–31

  2. Dodd JD (2007) Evidence-based practice in radiology: Steps 3 and 4—appraise and apply diagnostic radiology literature. Radiology 242(2):342–354

  3. Mindell HJ (1996) Do all homogeneously echogenic renal lesions that are smaller than 1.5 cm and are seen incidentally on sonograms (lesions presumed to be angiomyolipomas) require CT to confirm fat content of such lesions? AJR Am J Roentgenol 167(6):1590

  4. Siegel CL, Middleton WD, Teefey SA, McClennan BL (1996) Angiomyolipoma and renal cell carcinoma: US differentiation. Radiology 198:789–793

  5. Zebedin D, Kammerhuber F, Uggowitzer MM, Szolar DH (1998) Criteria for ultrasound differentiation of small angiomyolipomas (< or = 3 cm) and renal cell carcinomas. Rofo 169(6):627–632

  6. Yamashita Y, Ueno S, Makita O, et al. (1993) Hyperehoic renal tumors: anechoic rim and intratumoral cysts in US differentiation of renal cell carcinoma from angiomyolipoma. Radiology 188:179–182

  7. MacEneaney PM, Malone DE (2000) The meaning of diagnostic test results: a spreadsheet for swift data analysis. Clin Radiol 55:227–235

  8. Mouraviev V, Joniau S, Van Poppel H, Polascik TJ (2007) Current status of minimally invasive ablative techniques in the treatment of small renal tumours. Eur Urol 51(2):328–336

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Radiology Department, St. James’s Hospital, James’s Street, Dublin 8, Dublin, Ireland

    Cormac Farrelly, Holly Delaney & Ronan McDermott

  2. St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Dublin, Ireland

    Dermot Malone

Authors
  1. Cormac Farrelly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Holly Delaney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ronan McDermott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dermot Malone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cormac Farrelly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Farrelly, C., Delaney, H., McDermott, R. et al. Do all non-calcified echogenic renal lesions found on ultrasound need further evaluation with CT?. Abdom Imaging 33, 44–47 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9306-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9306-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation