Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Robustness of estimation of differential renal function in infants and children with unilateral prenatal diagnosis of a hydronephrotic kidney on dynamic renography: How real is the supranormal kidney?

  • Original article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The two methods recommended for estimation of differential renal function (DRF) in the renography guidelines published by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine are the area under the background-subtracted time-activity curves (AUCs) (often called the integral method) and the regression slope of the background-subtracted Rutland/Patlak plot analysis. The current study investigated the agreement/disagreement of DRF estimations obtained using these two techniques. This report also focusses on the occurrence of supranormal function of the affected kidney (defined as DRF >55%) and reviews the related technical and physiological factors.

Methods

A total of 394 renographic studies in 101 children with a prenatal diagnosis of unilateral renal pelvic dilatation confirmed on postnatal studies were retrieved from optical disc and reprocessed by one author. DRF was calculated using the Rutland/Patlak plot and the AUC over the time period 40–120 s following an injection of 99mTc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine. The difference in DRF between the methods (Rutland/Patlak minus AUC) and 95% limits of agreement were calculated. The age distribution of the difference between the methods was also analysed.

Results

For all 394 measurements the mean difference was −0.8% (range −21.0% to 16.9%, SD 3.9%). The 95% limits of agreement were −7.0% to 8.6%. Analysis of the data revealed that greater spread of DRF between the techniques was seen in studies performed at a younger age: a discrepancy of >5% DRF was significantly more common in those <1 year of age than in those >1 year old (25.3% vs 9.9%; chi-square, p<0.0005). Supranormal function was found less frequently using the Rutland/Patlak method than with the AUC method (8.4% vs 11.2%; chi-square, p<0.0005). The frequency of this diagnosis was reduced to 4.6% when both methods were required to be in agreement.

Conclusion

The current study supports the existence of age-related variation in the disparity of DRF estimations using the AUC and Rutland/Patlak methods in children with unilateral pelvic dilatation. The close agreement between the AUC and Rutland/Patlak techniques in estimation of DRF in older children supports their use. However, careful quality control of the renogram analysis is essential in young babies. Supranormal renal function (>55% DRF) may in fact be much less common in this group of children than is currently reported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Gonzalez R, Schimke CM. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants and children. Pediatr Clin North Am 2001;48:1505–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Prigent A, Cosgriff P, Gates GF, Granerus G, Fine EJ, Itoh K, et al. Consensus report on quality control of quantitative measurements of renal function obtained from the renogram: International Consensus Committee from the Scientific Committee of Radionuclides in Nephrourology. Semin Nucl Med 1999;29:146–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gordon I, Colarinha P, Fettich J, Fischer S, Frokier J, Hahn K, et al. Guidelines for standard and diuretic renography in children. Eur J Nucl Med 2001;28:BP21–30

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gungor F, Anderson P, Gordon I. Effect of the size of regions of interest on the estimation of differential renal function in children with congenital hydronephrosis. Nucl Med Commun 2002;23:147–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rutland MD. A comprehensive analysis of renal DTPA studies. I. Theory and normal values. Nucl Med Commun 1985;6:11–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Anderson PJ, Rangarajan V, Gordon I. Assessment of drainage in PUJ dilatation: pelvic excretion efficiency as an index of renal function. Nucl Med Commun 1997;18:823–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gordon I, Anderson PJ, Lythgoe MF, Orton M. Can technetium-99m-mercaptoacetyltriglycine replace technetium-99m-dimercaptosuccinic acid in the exclusion of a focal renal defect? J Nucl Med 1992;33:2090–3

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Piepsz A, Tondeur M, Ham H. Relative 99mTc-MAG3 renal uptake: reproducibility and accuracy. J Nucl Med 1999;40:972–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gluckman GR, Baskin LS, Bogaert GA, Mevorach RA, Hattner RS, Kogan BA. Contradictory renal function measured with mercaptoacetyltriglycine diuretic renography in unilateral hydronephrosis. J Urol 1995;154:1486–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fung LC, McLorie GA, Khoury AE, Ash JM, Gilday DL, Churchill BM. Contradictory supranormal nuclear renographic differential renal function: fact or artifact? J Urol 1995;154:667–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Capolicchio G, Jednak R, Dinh L, Salle JL, Brzezinski A, Houle AM. Supranormal renographic differential renal function in congenital hydronephrosis: fact, not artifact. J Urol 1999;161:1290–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Oh SJ, Moon DH, Kang W, Park YS, Park T, Kim KS. Supranormal differential renal function is real but may be pathological: assessment by 99m technetium mercaptoacetyltriglycine renal scan of congenital unilateral hydronephrosis. J Urol 2001;165:2300–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Moon DH, Park YS, Jun NL, Lee SY, Kim KS, Kim JH, et al. Value of supranormal function and renogram patterns on 99mTc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine scintigraphy in relation to the extent of hydronephrosis for predicting ureteropelvic junction obstruction in the newborn. J Nucl Med 2003;44:725–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Khan J, Charron M, Hickeson MP, Accorsi R, Qureshi S, Canning D. Supranormal renal function in unilateral hydronephrotic kidney can be avoided. Clin Nucl Med 2004;29:410–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Inanir S, Biyikli N, Noshari O, Caliskan B, Tugtepe H, Erdil TY, et al. Contradictory supranormal function in hydronephrotic kidneys: fact or artifact on pediatric MAG-3 renal scans? Clin Nucl Med 2005;30:91–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nuclear Medicine Department of Ege, University Faculty of Medicine, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey

    Zehra Ozcan

  2. Department of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital For Children, London, WC1N 3JH, UK

    Peter J. Anderson & Isky Gordon

Authors
  1. Zehra Ozcan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter J. Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Isky Gordon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isky Gordon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ozcan, Z., Anderson, P.J. & Gordon, I. Robustness of estimation of differential renal function in infants and children with unilateral prenatal diagnosis of a hydronephrotic kidney on dynamic renography: How real is the supranormal kidney?. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 33, 738–744 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-006-0094-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-006-0094-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation