Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of patient age on accuracy of primary MRI signs of long head of biceps tearing and instability in the shoulder: an MRI-arthroscopy correlation study

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To determine the effect of patient age on the accuracy of primary MRI signs of long head of biceps (LHB) tendon tearing and instability in the shoulder using arthroscopy as a reference standard.

Materials and methods

Subjects with MRI studies and subsequent arthroscopy documenting LHB tendon pathology were identified and organized into three age groups (18–40, 41–60, 61–87). Normal and tendinopathic tendons were labeled grade 0, partial tears grade 1 and full tears grade 2. Two radiologists blinded to arthroscopic data graded MRI studies independently. Prevalence of disease, MRI accuracy for outcomes of interest, and inter-reader agreement were calculated.

Results

Eighty-nine subjects fulfilled inclusion criteria with 36 grade 0, 36 grade 1 and 17 grade 2 tendons found at arthroscopy. MRI sensitivity, regardless of age, ranged between 67–86% for grade 0, 72–94% for grade 1 and 82–94% for grade 2 tendons. Specificity ranged between 83–96% for grade 0, 75–85% for grade 1 and 99–100% for grade 2 tendons. MRI accuracy for detection of each LHB category was calculated for each age group. MRI was found to be least sensitive for grade 0 and 1 LHB tendons in the middle-aged group with sensitivity between 55–85% for grade 0 and 53–88% for grade 1 tendons. Agreement between MRI readers was moderate with an unweighted kappa statistic of 62%.

Conclusion

MRI accuracy was moderate to excellent and agreement between MRI readers was moderate. MRI appears to be less accurate in characterizing lower grades of LHB tendon disease in middle-aged subjects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Murthi AM, Vosburgh CL, Neviaser TJ. The incidence of pathologic changes of the long head of the biceps tendon. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2000;9(5):382–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Khazzam M, et al. Disorders of the long head of biceps tendon. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2012;21(1):136–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ben Kibler W, et al. Clinical utility of traditional and new tests in the diagnosis of biceps tendon injuries and superior labrum anterior and posterior lesions in the shoulder. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(9):1840–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Buck FM, et al. Degeneration of the long biceps tendon: comparison of MRI with gross anatomy and histology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(5):1367–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zanetti M, et al. Tendinopathy and rupture of the tendon of the long head of the biceps brachii muscle: evaluation with MR arthrography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170(6):1557–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Razmjou H, et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting biceps pathology in patients with rotator cuff disorders: comparison with arthroscopy. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2016;25(1):38–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dubrow SA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy in detecting tears in the proximal biceps tendon using standard nonenhancing shoulder MRI. Open Access J Sports Med. 2014;5:81–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Polster JM, Schickendantz MS. Shoulder MRI: what do we miss? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195(3):577–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sowa D, et al. Preferential sites for rupture of the long head of the biceps tendon. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1995;133(6):568–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carr RM, Shishani Y, Gobezie R. How accurate are we in detecting biceps tendinopathy? Clin Sports Med. 2016;35(1):47–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tadros AS, et al. Long head of the biceps brachii tendon: unenhanced MRI versus direct MR arthrography. Skelet Radiol. 2015;44(9):1263–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Buck FM, et al. Long biceps tendon: normal position, shape, and orientation in its groove in neutral position and external and internal rotation. Radiology. 2011;261(3):872–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gaskin CM, et al. Anomalies of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon: clinical significance, MR arthrographic findings, and arthroscopic correlation in two patients. Skelet Radiol. 2007;36(8):785–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Spritzer CE, et al. Assessment of instability of the long head of the biceps tendon by MRI. Skelet Radiol. 2001;30(4):199–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schaeffeler C, et al. Lesions of the biceps pulley: diagnostic accuracy of MR arthrography of the shoulder and evaluation of previously described and new diagnostic signs. Radiology. 2012;264(2):504–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Urita A, et al. Predictive factors of long head of the biceps tendon disorders-the bicipital groove morphology and subscapularis tendon tear. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2016;25(3):384–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Habermeyer P, et al. Anterosuperior impingement of the shoulder as a result of pulley lesions: a prospective arthroscopic study. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2004;13(1):5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Baratloo A, et al. Part 1: Simple definition and calculation of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. Emerg (Tehran). 2015;3(2):48–9.

    Google Scholar 

  19. McGee S. Simplifying likelihood ratios. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(8):646–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pinto A, Brunese L. Spectrum of diagnostic errors in radiology. World J Radiol. 2010;2(10):377–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Beall DP, et al. Association of biceps tendon tears with rotator cuff abnormalities: degree of correlation with tears of the anterior and superior portions of the rotator cuff. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180(3):633–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Houtz CG, et al. Shoulder MRI accuracy in the community setting. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2011;20(4):537–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Halma JJ, et al. Interdisciplinary inter-observer agreement and accuracy of MR imaging of the shoulder with arthroscopic correlation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132(3):311–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mohtadi NG, et al. A prospective, double-blind comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy in the evaluation of patients presenting with shoulder pain. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2004;13(3):258–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Taylor SA, O’Brien SJ. Clinically relevant anatomy and biomechanics of the proximal biceps. Clin Sports Med. 2016;35(1):1–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Virk MS, Cole BJ. Proximal biceps tendon and rotator cuff tears. Clin Sports Med. 2016;35(1):153–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Braun S, et al. Lesions of the biceps pulley. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(4):790–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Patzer T, et al. Is there an association between SLAP lesions and biceps pulley lesions? Arthroscopy. 2011;27(5):611–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Streit JJ, et al. Tendinopathy of the long head of the biceps tendon: histopathologic analysis of the extra-articular biceps tendon and tenosynovium. Open Access J Sports Med. 2015;6:63–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Struhl S. Anterior internal impingement: an arthroscopic observation. Arthroscopy. 2002;18(1):2–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Victoria Cain for her assistance in preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

    Camilo G. Borrero, Joanna Costello & Dharmesh Vyas

  2. University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

    Marnie Bertolet

Authors
  1. Camilo G. Borrero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joanna Costello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marnie Bertolet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dharmesh Vyas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Camilo G. Borrero.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Borrero, C.G., Costello, J., Bertolet, M. et al. Effect of patient age on accuracy of primary MRI signs of long head of biceps tearing and instability in the shoulder: an MRI-arthroscopy correlation study. Skeletal Radiol 47, 203–214 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-017-2783-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-017-2783-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation