Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

MR-guided perineural injection of the ganglion impar: technical considerations and feasibility

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Perineural ganglion impar injections are used in the management of pelvic pain syndromes; however, there is no consensus regarding the optimal image guidance. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides high soft tissue contrast and the potential to directly visualize and target the ganglion. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of MR-guided percutaneous perineural ganglion impar injections.

Materials and methods

Six MR-guided ganglion impar injections were performed in six human cadavers. Procedures were performed with a clinical 1.5-Tesla MRI system through a far lateral transgluteus approach. Ganglion impar visibility, distance from the sacrococcygeal joint, number of intermittent MRI control steps required to place the needle, target error between the intended and final needle tip location, inadvertent punctures of non-targeted vulnerable structures, injectant distribution, and procedure time were determined.

Results

The ganglion impar was seen on MRI in 4/6 (66 %) of cases and located 0.8 mm cephalad to 16.3 mm caudad (average 1.2 mm caudad) to the midpoint of the sacrococcygeal joint. Needle placement required an average of three MRI control steps (range, 2–6). The average target error was 2.2 ± 2.1 mm. In 6/6 cases (100 %), there was appropriate periganglionic distribution and filling of the presacrococcygeal space. No punctures of non-targeted structures occurred. The median procedure time was 20 min (range, 12–29 min).

Conclusion

Interventional MRI can visualize and directly target the ganglion impar for accurate needle placement and successful periganglionic injection with the additional benefit of no ionizing radiation exposure to patient and staff. Our results support clinical evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahangari A. Prevalence of chronic pelvic pain among women: an updated review. Pain Physician. 2014;17:E141–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mathias SD, Kuppermann M, Liberman RF, Lipschutz RC, Steege JF. Chronic pelvic pain: prevalence, health-related quality of life, and economic correlates. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87:321–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fall M, Baranowski AP, Elneil S, et al. EAU guidelines on chronic pelvic pain. Eur Urol. 2010;57:35–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Green IC, Cohen SL, Finkenzeller D, Christo PJ. Interventional therapies for controlling pelvic pain: what is the evidence? Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2010;14:22–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Malec-Milewska M, Horosz B, Koleda I, et al. Neurolytic block of ganglion of Walther for the management of chronic pelvic pain. Wideochirurgia i Inne Techniki Malo Inwazyjne [Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques]/Kwartalnik pod Patronatem Sekcji Wideochirurgii TChP Oraz Sekcji Chirurgii Bariatrycznej TChP. 2014;9:458–62.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Scott-Warren JT, Hill V, Rajasekaran A. Ganglion impar blockade: a review. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2013;17:306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Walters A, Muhleman M, Osiro S, et al. One is the loneliest number: a review of the ganglion impar and its relation to pelvic pain syndromes. Clin Anat New York NY. 2013;26:855–61.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Restrepo-Garces CE, Saldarriaga NE, Jaramillo S, Gomez CM, Vargas JF, Ramirez LJ. Ganglion impar phenol injection in a pediatric patient with refractory cancer pain. Pain Med. 2014;15:334–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnston PJ, Michalek P. Blockade of the ganglion impar (Walther), using ultrasound and a loss of resistance technique. Prague Med Rep. 2012;113:53–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin CS, Cheng JK, Hsu YW, et al. Ultrasound-guided ganglion impar block: a technical report. Pain Med. 2010;11:390–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ho KY, Nagi PA, Gray L, Huh BK. An alternative approach to ganglion impar neurolysis under computed tomography guidance for recurrent vulva cancer. Anesthesiology. 2006;105:861–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Plancarte RAC, Patt RB. Presacral blockade of the ganglion of Walther (ganglion impar). Anesthesiology. 1990;73:A751.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hong JH, Jang HS. Block of the ganglion impar using a coccygeal joint approach. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006;31:583–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McAllister RK. Paramedial approach to the ganglion impar. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007;32:367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hol PK, Kvarstein G, Viken O, Smedby O, Tonnessen TI. MRI-guided celiac plexus block. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;12:562–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Konig CW, Schott UG, Pereira PL, et al. MR-guided lumbar sympathicolysis. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1388–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fritz J, Chhabra A, Wang KC, Carrino JA. Magnetic resonance neurography-guided nerve blocks for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2014;24:211–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fritz J, Bizzell C, Kathuria S, et al. High-resolution magnetic resonance-guided posterior femoral cutaneous nerve blocks. Skelet Radiol. 2013;42:579–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fritz J, UT P, Ungi T, et al. Augmented reality visualization with image overlay for MRI-guided intervention: accuracy for lumbar spinal procedures with a 1.5-T MRI system. AJR. 2012;198:W266–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fritz J, UT P, Ungi T, et al. Augmented reality visualization with use of image overlay technology for MR imaging-guided interventions: assessment of performance in cadaveric shoulder and hip arthrography at 1.5 T. Radiology. 2012;265:254–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Agarwal-Kozlowski K, Lorke DE, Habermann CR, Am Esch JS, Beck H. CT-guided blocks and neuroablation of the ganglion impar (Walther) in perineal pain: anatomy, technique, safety, and efficacy. Clin J Pain. 2009;25:570–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fritz J, Thomas C, Clasen S, Claussen CD, Lewin JS, Pereira PL. Freehand real-time MRI-guided lumbar spinal injection procedures at 1.5 T: feasibility, accuracy, and safety. AJR. 2009;192:W161–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Oh CS, Chung IH, Ji HJ, Yoon DM. Clinical implications of topographic anatomy on the ganglion impar. Anesthesiology. 2004;101:249–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Reig E, Abejon D, del Pozo C, Insausti J, Contreras R. Thermocoagulation of the ganglion impar or ganglion of Walther: description of a modified approach—preliminary results in chronic, nononcological pain. Pain Pract. 2005;5:103–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fritz J, UT P, Ungi T, et al. Augmented reality visualisation using an image overlay system for MR-guided interventions: technical performance of spine injection procedures in human cadavers at 1.5 Tesla. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:235–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Weiss CR, Marker DR, Fischer GS, Fichtinger G, Machado AJ, Carrino JA. Augmented reality visualization using image-overlay for MR-guided interventions: system description, feasibility, and initial evaluation in a spine phantom. AJR. 2011;196:W305–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. U-Thainual P, Fritz J, Moonjaita C, et al. MR image overlay guidance: system evaluation for preclinical use. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2013;8:365–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gautam SK, Agarwal A, Das PK. Ganglion impar block for sympathetically mediated pain in a patient with a rectourethral fistula. Pain Physician. 2014;17:E107.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gopal H, Mc Crory C. Coccygodynia treated by pulsed radio frequency treatment to the Ganglion of Impar: a case series. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2014;27:349–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gurses E. Impar ganglion radiofrequency application in successful management of oncologic perineal pain. JPMA. 2014;64:697–9.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Khosla A, Adeyefa O, Nasir S. Successful treatment of radiation-induced proctitis pain by blockade of the ganglion impar in an elderly patient with prostate cancer: a case report. Pain Med. 2013;14:662–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bhatnagar S, Khanna S, Roshni S, et al. Early ultrasound-guided neurolysis for pain management in gastrointestinal and pelvic malignancies: an observational study in a tertiary care center of urban India. Pain Pract. 2012;12:23–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Usta B, Gozdemir M, Sert H, Muslu B, Demircioglu RI. Fluoroscopically guided ganglion impar block by pulsed radiofrequency for relieving coccydynia. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2010;39:e1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lim SJ, Park HJ, Lee SH, Moon DE. Ganglion impar block with botulinum toxin type A for chronic perineal pain: a case report. Korean J Pain. 2010;23:65–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Demircay E, Kabatas S, Cansever T, Yilmaz C, Tuncay C, Altinors N. Radiofrequency thermocoagulation of ganglion impar in the management of coccydynia: preliminary results. Turk Neurosurg. 2010;20:328–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Foye PM, Patel SI. Paracoccygeal corkscrew approach to ganglion impar injections for tailbone pain. Pain Pract. 2009;9:317–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ellinas H, Sethna NF. Ganglion impar block for management of chronic coccydynia in an adolescent. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009;19:1137–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Datir A, Connell D. CT-guided injection for ganglion impar blockade: a radiological approach to the management of coccydynia. Clin Radiol. 2010;65:21–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Toshniwal GR, Dureja GP, Prashanth SM. Transsacrococcygeal approach to ganglion impar block for management of chronic perineal pain: a prospective observational study. Pain Physician. 2007;10:661–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Loev MA, Varklet VL, Wilsey BL, Ferrante FM. Cryoablation: a novel approach to neurolysis of the ganglion impar. Anesthesiology. 1998;88:1391–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Nebab EG, Florence IM. An alternative needle geometry for interruption of the ganglion impar. Anesthesiology. 1997;86:1213–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Eggleston ST, Lush LW. Understanding allergic reactions to local anesthetics. Ann Pharmacother. 1996;30:851–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Musculoskeletal Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 North Caroline Street, JHOC 3140A, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA

    David R. Marker, John A. Carrino & Jan Fritz

  2. Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Queen’s University, 99 University Avenue, Kingston, ON, Canada

    Paweena U-Thainual

  3. School of Computing, Queen’s University, 557 Goodwin Hall, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada

    Tamas Ungi & Gabor Fichtinger

  4. Siemens Corporate Research, Center for Applied Medical Imaging, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Aaron J. Flammang

  5. Department of Mechanical Engineering and Laboratory for Computational Sensing and Robotics, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles St., Hackerman 112, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA

    Iulian I. Iordachita

Authors
  1. David R. Marker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paweena U-Thainual
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tamas Ungi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aaron J. Flammang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gabor Fichtinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Iulian I. Iordachita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. John A. Carrino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jan Fritz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Fritz.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This research was supported by the National Cancer Institute (grant 1 R01 CA118371-01A2).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(AVI 1197 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marker, D.R., U-Thainual, P., Ungi, T. et al. MR-guided perineural injection of the ganglion impar: technical considerations and feasibility. Skeletal Radiol 45, 591–597 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-016-2333-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-016-2333-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation