Abstract
Objective
In this study we aimed to describe the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pattern of the distribution of bone marrow edema (BME) and joint erosion in hands and wrists of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with arthritis in comparison with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and healthy subjects (H).
Methods
SLE patients with arthritis (n = 50), patients with RA (n = 22), and H (n = 48) were enrolled. Every patient underwent a non-dominant hand (2nd–5th metacarpophalangeal joints) and wrist MRI without contrast injection with a low-field extremity dedicated 0.2-Tesla instrument.
Results
BME was observed in two SLE patients in the hand (4 %) and in 15 in the wrist (13 %) versus three (30 %), and 14 (63 %) RA patients. No BME was found in H. Erosions were observed in the hand in 24 SLE patients (48 %), 15 RA patients (68 %), and 9 H (18 %); in the wrist, in 41 (82 %) SLE, all RA and 47 (97 %) H. The cumulative erosive burden in SLE was significantly higher than in H (c = 0.002) but similar to RA patients.
Conclusions
Joint involvement of the wrist in SLE is similar to RA and is not as rare as expected, as shown by the comparison with healthy subjects. On the contrary, the involvement of the hand in SLE is significantly lower compared to RA.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Malcus Johnsson P, Sandqvist G, Bengtsson A, et al. Hand function and performance of daily activities in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:1432–8.
Døhn UM, Ejbjerg BJ, Hasselquist M, et al. Detection of bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis wrist joints with magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and radiography. Arthritis Res Ther. 2008;10:R25.
Ejbjerg BJ, Vestergaard A, Jacobsen S, et al. Conventional radiography requires a MRI-estimated bone volume loss of 20Â % to 30Â % to allow certain detection of bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis metacarpophalangeal joints. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8:R59.
Schmidt WA, Schicke B, Ostendorf B, et al. Low-field MRI versus ultrasound: which is more sensitive in detecting inflammation and bone damage in MCP and MTP joints in mild or moderate rheumatoid arthritis? Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013;31:91–6.
American College of Rheumatology Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials Task Force Imaging Group and Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Magnetic Resonance Imaging Inflammatory Arthritis Working Group. Review: the utility of magnetic resonance imaging for assessing structural damage in randomized controlled trials in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2013;65:2513–2523.
Broll M, Albrecht K, Tarner I, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography and low-field magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012;30:543–7.
Hochberg MC. Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for 463 the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40:1725.
Tani C, D'Aniello D, Delle Sedie A, et al. Rhupus syndrome: assessment of its prevalence and its clinical and instrumental characteristics in a prospective cohort of 103 SLE patients. Autoimmun Rev. 2013;12:537–41.
Østergaard M, Edmonds J, McQueen F, et al. An introduction to the EULAR–OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis MRI reference image atlas. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64 Suppl 1:i3–7.
Bird P, Conaghan P, Ejbjerg B, et al. The development of the EULAR–OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis MRI reference image atlas. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:(Suppl 1):i8–i10.
Ostergaard M, Møller Døhn U, Duer-Jensen A, et al. Patterns of magnetic resonance imaging bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritis–which bones are most frequently involved and show the most change? J Rheumatol. 2011;38:2014–7.
Ejbjerg B, Narvestad E, Rostrup E, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of wrist and finger joints in healthy subjects occasionally shows changes resembling erosions and synovitis as seen in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:1097–106.
Parodi M, Silvestri E, Garlaschi G, et al. How normal are the hands of normal controls? A study with dedicated magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2006;24:134–41.
Olech E, Crues 3rd JV, Yocum DE, et al. Bone marrow edema is the most specific finding for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging of the hands and wrists: a comparison of patients with RA and healthy controls. J Rheumatol. 2010;37:265–74.
Ostergaard M, Conaghan PG, O'Connor P, Szkudlarek M, Klarlund M, Emery P, et al. Reducing invasiveness, duration, and cost of magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis by omitting intravenous contrast injection: does it change the assessment of inflammatory and destructive joint changes by the OMERACT RAMRIS? J Rheumatol. 2009;36:1806–10.
Sá Ribeiro D, Galvão V, Luiz Fernandes J, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of Jaccoud's arthropathy in systemic lupus erythematosus. Joint Bone Spine. 2010;77:241–5.
Ostendorf B, Scherer A, Specker C, et al. Jaccoud's arthropathy in systemic lupus erythematosus: differentiation of deforming and erosive patterns by magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:157–65.
Boutry N, Hachulla E, Flipo RM, et al. MR imaging findings in hands in early rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with those in systemic lupus erythematosus and primary Sjögren syndrome. Radiology. 2005;236:593–600.
Mosca M, Boumpas DT, Bruce IN, et al. Treat-to-target in systemic lupus erythematosus: where are we today? Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012;30:S112–5.
Mosca M, Tani C, Filice ME, et al. TNF-alpha inhibitors in systemic lupus erythematosus. A case report and a systematic literature review. Mod Rheumatol 2013 Nov 4. [Epub ahead of print]
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr. Wendy Doherty for her English language revision of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
None.
Founding
None
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chiara, T., Dario, D., Niccolò, P. et al. MRI pattern of arthritis in systemic lupus erythematosus: a comparative study with rheumatoid arthritis and healthy subjects. Skeletal Radiol 44, 261–266 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-014-2033-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-014-2033-0