Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The short- and medium-term effectiveness of CT-guided selective cervical nerve root injection for pain and disability

  • Technical Report
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

CT-guided cervical nerve root injection with corticosteroid and/or local anesthetic is a recognized technique in the evaluation and treatment of cervical radiculopathy. There are few prospective studies on the efficacy of the various techniques employed in cervical nerve root injection. We present our results from a 1-year prospective series using a CT-guided anterolateral transforaminal approach for cervical nerve root injection of bupivacaine and dexamethasone.

Methods

Pain using a numeric rating scale was assessed at pre-injection, 15 min post-injection, 1 month, and 3 months. Disability was assessed using the Oswestry Neck Disability Index (NDI) questionnaire at pre-injection, 1 month post-injection, and 3 months.

Results

In total, 50 patients were followed for 3 months. The mean reductions in pain were: 15 min (77 %), 1 month (39 %), and 3 months (33 %). The mean reductions in NDI were: 1 month (26 %) and 3 months (also 26 %). Results were statistically significant.

Conclusions

CT-guided selective cervical nerve root injection in the treatment of cervical radicular pain and related disability produces statistically significant reductions in pain and disability to at least 3 months post-procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Radhakrishnan K, Litchy WJ, O’Fallon WM, Kurland LT. Epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy. A population-based study from Rochester, Minnesota, 1976 through 1990. Brain. 1994;117(Pt 2):325–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lees F, Turner JW. Natural history and prognosis of cervical spondylosis. Br Med J. 1963;2(5373):1607–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Silbergleit R, Mehta BA, Sanders WP, Talati SJ. Imaging-guided injection techniques with fluoroscopy and CT for spinal pain management. RadioGraphics. 2001;21:927–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jee H, Lee JH, Kim J, Park KD, Lee WY, Park Y. Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided transforaminal block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: a randomized, blinded, controlled study. Skeletal Radiol. 2013;42(1):69–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manip Physiol Ther. 1991;14(7):409–15.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Huston CW. Cervical epidural steroid injections in the management of cervical radiculitis: interlaminar versus transforaminal. A review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2009;2(1):30–42.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Scanlon GC, Moeller-Bertram T, Romanowsky SM, Wallace MS. Cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections more dangerous than we think? Spine. 2007;32(11):1249–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Malhotra G, Abbasi A, Rhee M. Complications of transforaminal cervical epidural steroid injections. Spine. 2009; 1;34(7):731–9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wallace MA, Fukui MB, Williams RL, Ku A, Baghai P. Complications of cervical selective nerve root blocks performed with fluoroscopic guidance. AJR. 2007;188:1218–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee JH, Lee SH. Comparison of clinical effectiveness of cervical transforaminal steroid injection according to different radiological guidances (C-arm fluoroscopy vs. computed tomography fluoroscopy). Spine J. 2011;11(5):416–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kolstad F, Leivseth G, Nygaard OP. Transforaminal steroid injections in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. A prospective outcome study. Acta Neurochir. 2005;147(10):1065–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim H, Lee SH, Kim MH. Multislice CT fluoroscopy-assisted cervical transforaminal injection of steroids: technical note. J Spinal Discord Tech. 2007;20(6):456–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Anderberg L, Annertz M, Persson L, Brandt L, Säveland H. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(3):321–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cyteval C, Thomas E, Decoux E, Sarrabere MP, Cottin A, Blotman F, et al. Cervical radiculopathy: open study on percutaneous periradicular foraminal steroid infiltration performed under ct control in 30 patients. Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25:441–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Strobel K, Christian W, Pfirrmann A, Schmid M, Hodler J, Boos N, et al. Cervical nerve root blocks: indications and role of MR imaging. Radiology. 2004;233:87–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wolter T, Knoeller S, Berlis A, Hader C. CT-guided cervical selective nerve root block with a dorsal approach. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31(10):1831–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Eun SS, Chang WS, Bae SJ, Lee SH, Lee DY. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2010;48:419–22.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Razzaq AA, O’Brien D, Mathew B, Bartlett R, Taylor D. Br J Neurosurg. 2007;21(4):365–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naveen Sharma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Desai, A., Saha, S., Sharma, N. et al. The short- and medium-term effectiveness of CT-guided selective cervical nerve root injection for pain and disability. Skeletal Radiol 43, 973–978 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-014-1843-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-014-1843-4

Keywords

Navigation