Part II

Diagnosis

Extradigital glomus tumor (subcutaneous glomus tumor of the arm).

Discussion

The diagnostic approach to superficial soft-tissue masses is challenging. These may be categorized as mesenchymal tumors, skin appendage lesions, metastatic tumors, or inflammatory lesions [1]. The differential diagnosis should first be limited by considering the age and gender of the patient, as well as the detailed anatomic location of the lesion (extremity, trunk, or head and neck; and cutaneous, subcutaneous or fascial) [1, 2]. It may further be restricted by taking into account the salient clinical manifestations and imaging findings [2]. By applying this approach to our case, the main differential diagnosis consisted of peripheral nerve sheath tumor (schwannoma, neurofibroma), angiolipoma, leiomyoma cutis (including piloleiomyoma and angioleiomyoma), eccrine spiradenoma, and glomus tumor [1, 2]. First, although the distinctive imaging features of peripheral nerve sheath tumors, such as depiction of the nerve entering or exiting the tumor, are difficult to assess in superficial lesions [1], the presented lesion was not in the territory of a major nerve. In addition, the fact that it was hypersensitive to cold should have directed the diagnosis towards a glomus tumor or leiomyoma cutis [24]. However, the latter occurs more commonly in middle-aged women and predominantly in lower extremities. Second, angiolipomas typically have a heterogeneous pattern with areas of high signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted images [1, 2]. They often exhibit areas of recent hemorrhage. Besides, apart from those five painful subcutaneous lesions, other primary or secondary neoplasms (such as benign or malignant fibrous histiocytoma, leiomyosarcoma, or melanoma metastasis) might be considered. However, these are not tender. Therefore, despite being in an extradigital location, a glomus tumor was the most likely diagnosis.

Glomus tumors are benign perivascular neoplasms arising from the smooth muscle cells of neuromyoarterial glomus bodies [3, 4]. They account for about 2 % of soft-tissue tumors of extremities, and represent between 1 and 5 % of all upper extremity neoplasms [3, 5]. While a female predominance (2:1 to 3:1) has been noted for digital tumors, extradigital neoplasms are more common in men (greater than 4:1) [3, 5]. Glomus tumors can occur at any age, although predominantly between the third to fifth decades of life for digital and the fourth to seventh for extradigital neoplasms [3]. They tend to be solitary and can occur in virtually any organ of the body. The hands are involved in up to 75 % of cases, with a subungual location in 50 to 65 % of those [35].

Depending on the varying proportion of glomus cells, blood vessels and smooth muscle tissue, glomus tumors are categorized as glomus tumor proper, glomangioma, and glomangiomyoma, respectively [6, 7]. Microscopic examination reveals clusters of monomorphous cells with rounded nuclei and scant eosinophilic cytoplasm (Fig. 3b) [7]. Besides, these tumors are extremely rich in reticulin (Fig. 3c) [7]. At immunohistochemistry, glomus cells typically stain for smooth muscle actin (Fig. 3d) and vimentin, as opposed to vascular neoplasms whose endothelial cells are immunoreactive for CD31, CD34, and factor VIII [6, 7]. Malignant transformation (glomangiosarcoma) is exceedingly rare but should be considered when the tumor presents atypical features, such as large size (greater than 2 cm), deep location, infiltrative growth pattern, mitotic activity, nuclear pleomorphism, and necrosis [8].

The clinical features of glomus tumors vary with their location. While digital tumors exhibit the classic clinical triad of paroxysmal pain, localized tenderness and hypersensitivity to cold in 63 to 100 % of cases, these findings are much less common with extradigital neoplasms [3, 4]. On physical examination, they tend to manifest as small bluish subungual or subcutaneous nodules that are exquisitely tender to touch. Extradigital lesions have a less specific presentation, which often leads to misdiagnosis and/or long delay in diagnosis [3].

The imaging findings of glomus tumors also depend on their location (digital vs. extradigital; and soft-tissue vs. bone). Conventional radiographs are usually normal but a small scalloped bony defect may be seen when the tumor is adjacent to bone [4]. In contrast, a well-defined radiolucent area with sclerotic margins is noted with intraosseous tumors [4]. Owing to its high spatial resolution, US is helpful to assess superficial glomus tumors. These appear as well-circumscribed, solid, hypoechoic lesions surrounded by a capsule, with marked intralesional vascularity on color and power Doppler US examination (Fig. 1a,b) [4, 9]. Recently, the “vascular stalk sign” was reported to be visible in 67 % of extradigital lesions on color Doppler US [9]. This corresponds to the presence of prominent vascular flow connecting the lesion to adjacent soft-tissue (Fig. 1b) [9]. Computed tomography is generally used in the work-up of deep (thoracic, abdominal, or intraosseous) glomus tumors [4]. Magnetic resonance is the imaging modality of choice owing to its high sensitivity (82–100 %) [4, 10]. The lesions are typically of low or intermediate signal intensity on T1- and high signal intensity on T2-weighted images, with strong enhancement after intravenous gadolinium administration (Fig. 2a–d) [4, 10].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Longitudinal a B-mode and b color Doppler US images (17-5 MHz linear probe) of the lateral aspect of the right arm

Fig. 2
figure 2

Axial a T1-weighted (repetition time/echo time, 573/11), b fat-suppressed (FS) T2-weighted (5770/86) and c gadolinium-enhanced FS T1-weighted (621/11) turbo spin-echo MR images of the right arm d Coronal maximum-intensity projection (MIP) FS T1-weighted (2.8/1.1) gradient -recalledecho MR angiographic view of the right arm, in the early arterial phase (16 sec)

Surgery is the treatment of choice for glomus tumors [3, 5]. Due to their small size and frequent superficial location, these neoplasms can be readily and fully excised (Figs. 3a and 4), with instant relief of symptoms. However, recurrences have been reported in 12 to 33 % of cases [3]. Therapeutic options consist primarily in punch or shave biopsy [3].

Fig. 3
figure 3

a Gross pathologic examination demonstrates the glomus tumor lying within the subcutaneous fat, just below the epidermal and dermal skin layers. b Histopathological examination reveals sheets of bland medium-sized cells surrounding vessels of variable size (H&E stain; original magnification ×100). c The glomus tumor is extremely rich in reticulin (original magnification ×100). d Immunohistochemical analysis reveals numerous glomus cells that stain strongly for smooth-muscle actin (original magnification ×20)

Fig. 4
figure 4

Intraoperative view depicts the subcutaneous glomus tumor, of bluish color, with its vascular pedicle

In conclusion, a high index of suspicion is mandatory to promptly and accurately make the diagnosis of extradigital glomus tumors. These benign perivascular neoplasms should be included in the differential diagnosis of painful subcutaneous nodules, particularly when the clinical triad of paroxysmal pain, localized tenderness, and hypersensitivity to cold is present.