Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quantitative assessment of bone defect healing by multidetector CT in a pig model

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate multidetector CT volumetry in the assessment of bone defect healing in comparison to histopathological findings in an animal model.

Materials and methods

In 16 mini-pigs, a circumscribed tibial bone defect was created. Multidetector CT (MDCT) of the tibia was performed on a 64-row scanner 42 days after the operation. The extent of bone healing was estimated quantitatively by MDCT volumetry using a commercially available software programme (syngo Volume, Siemens, Germany).The volume of the entire defect (including all pixels from −100 to 3,000 HU), the nonconsolidated areas (−100 to 500 HU), and areas of osseous consolidation (500 to 3,000 HU) were assessed and the extent of consolidation was calculated. Histomorphometry served as the reference standard.

Results

The extent of osseous consolidation in MDCT volumetry ranged from 19 to 92% (mean 65.4 ± 18.5%). There was a significant correlation between histologically visible newly formed bone and the extent of osseous consolidation on MDCT volumetry (r = 0.82, P < 0.0001). A significant negative correlation was detected between osseous consolidation on MDCT and histological areas of persisting defect (r = −0.9, P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

MDCT volumetry is a promising tool for noninvasive monitoring of bone healing, showing excellent correlation with histomorphometry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Praemer A, Furner S, Rice DP. Musculosceletal conditions in the United States. Park Ridge: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hammer RR, Hammerby S, Lindholm B. Accuracy of radiologic assessment of tibial shaft fracture union in humans. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;199:233–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blockhuis TJ, de Bruine JH, Bramer JA, et al. The reliability of plain radiography in experimental fracture healing. Skeletal Radiol. 2001;30:151–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Letournel E. Acetabulum fractures: classification and mamagement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;151:81–106.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Panjabi MM, Lindsey RW, Walter SD, et al. The clinican’s ability to evaluate the strength of healing fractures from plain radiographs. J Orthop Trauma. 1989;3:29–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nicholls PJ, Berg E, Bliven Jr FE, Kling JM. X-ray diagnosis of healing fractures in rabbits. Clin Orthop. 1979;142:234–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schnarkowski P, Rédei J, Peterfy CG, et al. Tibial shaft fractures: assessment of fracture healing with computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1995;19(5):777–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Panjabi MM, Walter SD, Karuda M, White AA, Lawson JP. Correlations of radiographic analysis of healing fractures with strength: a statistical analysis of experimental osteotomies. J Orthop Res. 1985;3:212–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Morgan EF, Mason ZD, Chien KB, et al. Micro-computed tomography assessment of fracture healing: relationships among callus structure, composition, and mechanical function. Bone. 2009;44:335–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Firoozabadi R, Morsher S, Engelke K, et al. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of bone fragilitiy and fracture healing using conventional radiography and advanced imaging technologies-focus on wrist fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22(8):83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Warwick R, Willatt JM, Singhal B, Borremans J, Meagher T. Comparison of computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging in fracture healing after spinal injury. Spinal Cord. 2009;47(12):874–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Den Boer FC, Bramer JAM, Patka P, et al. Quantification of fracture healing with three-dimensional computed tomography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1998;117:345–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Augat P, Merk J, Genant HK, Claes L. Quantitative assessment of experimental fracture repair by peripheral computed tomography. Calcif Tissue Int. 1997;60:194–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Freeman TA, Patel P, Parvizi J, Antoci Jr V, Shapiro IM. Micro-CT analysis with multiple thresholds allows detection of bone formation and resorption during ultrasound-treated fracture healing. J Orthop Res. 2009;27(5):673–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eley KA, Witherow H, Hayward R, Evans R, Young K, Clark A, et al. The evaluation of bony union after frontofacial distraction. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20(2):275–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jungbluth P, Wild M, Grassmann JP, Ar E, Sager M, Herten M, et al. Platelet-rich plasma on calcium phosphate granules promotes metaphyseal bone healing in mini-pigs. J Orthop Res. 2010;28(11):1448–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Grigoryan M, Lynch JA, Fierlinger AL, et al. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of closed fracture healing using computed tomography and conventional radiography. Acad Radiol. 2003;10:1267–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hakimi M, Jungbluth P, Sager M, Betsch M, Herten M, Becker J, et al. Combined use of platelet-rich plasma and autologous bone grafts in the treatment of long bone defects in mini-pigs. Injury. 2010;41(7):717–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wheeler DL, Cross AR, Eschbach EJ, et al. Grafting of massive ytibial subchondral bone defects in a caprine model using beta-tricalcium phosphate versus autograft. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19(2):85–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Özcelik D, Hüthüt I, Kuran I, Bankaouglu M, Orhan Z, Mayda AS. Comparison of accuracy of three dimensional spiral computed tomography, standard radiography, and direct measurement in evaluating facial fracture healing in a rat model. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;53(5):473–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sarkar MR, Augat P, Shefelbine SJ, et al. Bone formation in a long bone defect model using a platelet-rich plasma-loaded collagen scaffold. Biomaterials. 2006;27:1817–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wiedmer U, Freuler F, Bianchini D. Fracture movement and fracture healing in plaster fixation. Arch Orthop Unfallchir. 1975;82(2):177–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patric Kröpil.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Riegger, C., Kröpil, P., Jungbluth, P. et al. Quantitative assessment of bone defect healing by multidetector CT in a pig model. Skeletal Radiol 41, 531–537 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-011-1203-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-011-1203-6

Keywords

Navigation