Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Applicability of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket and dynamic membrane-coupled process for the treatment of municipal wastewater

  • Environmental biotechnology
  • Published:
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the applicability of dynamic membrane filter (DMF) technology in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) and DMF-coupled process for the treatment of municipal wastewater. The overall treatment performance and effects of hydraulic retention time (HRT), operating flux, and mesh pore size on the UASB + DMF were assessed. The UASB + DMF-coupled process demonstrated removal efficiencies of over 64 and 86% for TCOD and TSS, respectively. The effects of filtration flux and support mesh pore size were investigated and it was found that while there was little impact on the treatment performance, a 67% increase in operating flux resulted in a 25% increase in fouling rate. Similarly, with smaller mesh pore size (Mesh 500 with pore size of 28 μm) the fouling rate increased by fourfold as compared to Mesh 300 (pore size of 46 μm). In consideration of the operation duration and contaminant removal, the DMF with Mesh 300 support layer and operating at 100 L/m2-h was the most efficient configuration for treating the effluent of the UASB operated with a HRT of 6 h. Microbial analyses of the foulant layer revealed changes in relative abundance as compared to the bulk sludge, particularly with the hydrogenotrophic methanogens completely outcompeting the acetoclastic methanogens. Overall, the coupled process improved the system robustness and reduced variability of the treated effluent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APHA (2012) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater

  • Borges LI, López-Vazquez CM, García H, van Lier JB (2015) Nitrite reduction and methanogenesis in a single-stage UASB reactor. Water Sci Technol 72:2236–2242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cao X, Sheng Y, Cao H, Zhang Y (2014) Comparison of Mg2+- and Ca2+-enhancing anaerobic granulation in an expanded granular sludge-bed reactor. Sci China Chem 57:1596–1601. doi:10.1007/s11426-014-5197-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinali-Rezende J, Araújo JC, Almeida PGS, Chernicharo CAL, Sanz JL, Chartone-Souza E, Nascimento AMA (2013) Organic loading rate and food-to-microorganism ratio shape prokaryotic diversity in a demo-scale up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor treating domestic wastewater. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 104:993–1003. doi:10.1007/s10482-013-0018-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chernicharo CAL (2007) Anaerobic reactors. IWA Publishing, London

  • Dubois M, Gilles K, Hamilton J, Rebers P, Smith F (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28:350–356. doi:10.1021/ac60111a017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ersahin ME, Ozgun H, Dereli RK, Ozturk I, Roest K, van Lier JB (2012) A review on dynamic membrane filtration: materials, applications and future perspectives. Bioresour Technol 122:196–206. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.086

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ersahin ME, Ozgun H, Tao Y, van Lier JB (2014) Applicability of dynamic membrane technology in anaerobic membrane bioreactors. Water Res 48:420–429. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2013.09.054

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ersahin ME, Tao Y, Ozgun H, Spanjers H, van Lier JB (2015) Characteristics and role of dynamic membrane layer in anaerobic membrane bioreactors. Biotechnol Bioeng 113:761–771. doi:10.1002/bit.25841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fakhimi N, Mehrnia MR (2015) Control of mixing for optimal formation of dynamic membrane in MBRs. Desalin Water Treat 57:15759–15771. doi:10.1080/19443994.2015.1076354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan B, Huang X (2002) Characteristics of a self-forming dynamic membrane coupled with a bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Technol 36:5245–5251. doi:10.1021/es025789n

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Field RW, Pearce GK (2011) Critical, sustainable and threshold fluxes for membrane filtration with water industry applications. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 164:38–44. doi:10.1016/j.cis.2010.12.008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frøund B, Griebe T, Nielsen P (1995) Enzymatic activity in the activated-sludge floc matrix. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 43:755–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs W, Resch C, Kernstock M, Mayer M, Schoeberl P, Braun R (2005) Influence of operational conditions on the performance of a mesh filter activated sludge process. Water Res 39:803–810. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2004.12.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gao D-W, Zhang T, Tang C-YY, Wu W-M, Wong C-Y, Lee YH, Yeh DH, Criddle CS (2010) Membrane fouling in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor: differences in relative abundance of bacterial species in the membrane foulant layer and in suspension. J Memb Sci 364:331–338. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2010.08.031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • GonÇalves RF, Charlier AC, Sammut F (1994) Primary fermentation of soluble and particulate organic matter for wastewater treatment. Water Sci Technol 30:53–62

  • Hao L, Bize A, Conteau D, Chapleur O, Courtois S, Kroff P, Desmond-Le Quéméner E, Bouchez T, Mazéas L (2016) New insights into the key microbial phylotypes of anaerobic sludge digesters under different operational conditions. Water Res 102:158–169. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2016.06.014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ho JH, Khanal SK, Sung S (2007) Anaerobic membrane bioreactor for treatment of synthetic municipal wastewater at ambient temperature. Water Sci Technol 55:79–86. doi:10.2166/wst.2007.130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim B-C, Nam J-W, Kang K-H (2017) Dynamic membrane filtration using powdered iron oxide for SWRO pre-treatment during red tide event. J Memb Sci 524:604–611. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.081

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kiso Y, Jung Y-J, Ichinari T, Park M, Kitao T, Nishimura K, Min K-S (2000) Wastewater treatment performance of a filtration bio-reactor equipped with a mesh as a filter material. Water Res 34:4143–4150. doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00201-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kunacheva C, Stuckey DC (2014) Analytical methods for soluble microbial products (SMP) and extracellular polymers (ECP) in wastewater treatment systems: a review. Water Res 61:1–18. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2014.04.044

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee W, Kang S, Shin H (2003) Sludge characteristics and their contribution to microfiltration in submerged membrane bioreactors. J Memb Sci 216:217–227. doi:10.1016/S0376-7388(03)00073-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leitão RC, van Haandel AC, Zeeman G, Lettinga G (2006) The effects of operational and environmental variations on anaerobic wastewater treatment systems: a review. Bioresour Technol 97:1105–1118. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.12.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li N, Hu Y, Lu Y-Z, Zeng RJ, Sheng G-P (2016) In-situ biogas sparging enhances the performance of an anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) with mesh filter in low-strength wastewater treatment. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1–9. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7455-2

  • Lin HJ, Xie K, Mahendran B, Bagley DM, Leung KT, Liss SN, Liao BQ (2009) Sludge properties and their effects on membrane fouling in submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactors (SAnMBRs). Water Res 43:3827–3837. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2009.05.025

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lin H, Chen J, Wang F, Ding L, Hong H (2011) Feasibility evaluation of submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor for municipal secondary wastewater treatment. Desalination 280:120–126. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2011.06.058

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275. doi:10.1016/0304-3894(92)87011-4

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Massé A, Spérandio M, Cabassud C (2006) Comparison of sludge characteristics and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor and an activated sludge process at high solids retention time. Water Res 40:2405–2415. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meng F, Zhang H, Yang F, Zhang S, Li Y, Zhang X (2006) Identification of activated sludge properties affecting membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors. Sep Purif Technol 51:95–103. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2006.01.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meng F, Zhou Z, Ni B-J, Zheng X, Huang G, Jia X, Li S, Xiong Y, Kraume M (2011) Characterization of the size-fractionated biomacromolecules: tracking their role and fate in a membrane bioreactor. Water Res 45:4661–4671. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2011.06.026

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveros JC (2007) Venny. An interactive tool for comparing lists with Venn’s diagrams. http://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html

  • Park M, Kiso Y, Jung Y, Simase M, Wang W, Kitao T, Min K (2004) Sludge thickening performance of mesh filtration process. Water Sci Technol 50:125–133

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pillay VL, Townsend B, Buckley CA (1994) Improving the performance of anaerobic digesters at wastewater treatment works: the coupled cross-flow microfiltration/digester process. Water Sci Technol 30:329–337

  • Rosenberger SF, Laabs C, Lesjean B, Gnirss R, Amy G, Jekel M, Schrotter J-C (2006) Impact of colloidal and soluble organic material on membrane performance in membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment. Water Res 40:710–720. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2005.11.028

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz I, Soto M, Veiga MC, Ligero P, Vega A, Blázquez R (1998) Performance of and biomass characterisation in a UASB reactor treating domestic waste water at ambient temperature. Water SA 24:215–222

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saia FT, Souza TSO, Duarte RTD, Pozzi E, Fonseca D, Foresti E (2016) Microbial community in a pilot-scale bioreactor promoting anaerobic digestion and sulfur-driven denitrification for domestic sewage treatment. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 39:341–352. doi:10.1007/s00449-015-1520-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seghezzo L, Zeeman G, van Lier JB, Hamelers HVM, Lettinga G (1998) A review: the anaerobic treatment of sewage in UASB and EGSB reactors. Bioresour Technol 65:175–190. doi:10.1016/S0960-8524(98)00046-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shi X, Ng KK, Li X-R, Ng HY (2015) Investigation of intertidal wetland sediment as a novel inoculation source for anaerobic saline wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Technol 49:6231–6239. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b00546

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith AL, Stadler LB, Love NG, Skerlos SJ, Raskin L (2012) Perspectives on anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatment of domestic wastewater: a critical review. Bioresour Technol 122:149–159. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.055

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Souza CL, Chernicharo CAL, Aquino SF (2011) Quantification of dissolved methane in UASB reactors treating domestic wastewater under different operating conditions. Water Sci Technol 64:2259–2264. doi:10.2166/wst.2011.695

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tung K-L, Damodar H-R, Damodar R-A, Lin N-J, Chuang C-J, You S-J, Li Y-L (2014) Study on the effect of flux on particle fouling in a submerged membrane filtration system using a photo-interrupt sensor. J Water Sustain 4:205–225. doi:10.11912/jws.2014.4.4.205-225

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker M, Banks CJ, Heaven S (2009) Development of a coarse membrane bioreactor for two-stage anaerobic digestion of biodegradable municipal solid waste. Water Sci Technol 59:729–735. doi:10.2166/wst.2009.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Mei X, Wu Z, Ye S, Yang D (2012) Effects of biopolymer discharge from MBR mixture on sludge characteristics and membrane fouling. Chem Eng J 193–194:77–87. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2012.04.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Mei X, Ma J, Grasmick A, Wu Z (2013) Potential foulants and fouling indicators in MBRs: a critical review. Sep Sci Technol 48:22–50. doi:10.1080/01496395.2012.682288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Huang X, Zuo W (2005) Effect of mesh pore size on performance of self-forming dynamic membrane coupled bioreactor for domestic wastewater treatment, future of urban wastewater. In: IWA International Conference

  • Xue N, Xia J, Huang X (2012) Fouling control of a pilot scale self-forming dynamic membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Desalin Water Treat 18:302–308. doi:10.5004/dwt.2010.1812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye F, Ye Y, Li Y (2011) Effect of C/N ratio on extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and physicochemical properties of activated sludge flocs. J Hazard Mater 188:37–43. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.043

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yu H, Wang Z, Wu Z, Zhu C (2015) Dynamic membrane formation in anaerobic dynamic membrane bioreactors: role of extracellular polymeric substances. PLoS One 10:e0139703. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139703

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yue X, Koh YKK, Ng HY (2015) Effects of dissolved organic matters (DOMs) on membrane fouling in anaerobic ceramic membrane bioreactors (AnCMBRs) treating domestic wastewater. Water Res 86:96–107. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2015.07.038

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Wang Z, Wu Z, Lu F, Tong J, Zang L (2010) Formation of dynamic membrane in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Chem Eng J 165:175–183. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2010.09.013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Wang Z, Wu Z, Wei T, Lu F, Tong J, Mai S (2011) Membrane fouling in an anaerobic dynamic membrane bioreactor (AnDMBR) for municipal wastewater treatment: characteristics of membrane foulants and bulk sludge. Process Biochem 46:1538–1544. doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2011.04.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Chu H, Zhou X, Dong B (2014) Dewatering of Chlorella pyrenoidosa using diatomite dynamic membrane: filtration performance, membrane fouling and cake behavior. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 113:458–466. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.09.046

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhi-Guo M, Feng-lin Y, Xing-wen Z (2005) MBR focus: do nonwovens offer a cheaper option? Filtr Sep 42:28–30. doi:10.1016/S0015-1882(05)70558-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support by the Ministry of Education, Singapore, for Pei Jun Quek’s PhD program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, 1 Engineering Drive 2, Singapore, 117576, Singapore

    Pei Jun Quek, Tsuey Shan Yeap & How Yong Ng

Authors
  1. Pei Jun Quek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tsuey Shan Yeap
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. How Yong Ng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to How Yong Ng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 447 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Quek, P.J., Yeap, T.S. & Ng, H.Y. Applicability of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket and dynamic membrane-coupled process for the treatment of municipal wastewater. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101, 6531–6540 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8358-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8358-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation