Skip to main content
Log in

Organics and nitrogen removal and sludge stability in aerobic granular sludge membrane bioreactor

  • Environmental Biotechnology
  • Published:
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Novel aerobic granular sludge membrane bioreactor (GMBR) was established by combining aerobic granular sludge technology with membrane bioreactor (MBR). GMBR showed good organics removal and simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SND) performances for synthesized wastewater. When influent total organic carbon (TOC) was 56.8–132.6 mg/L, the TOC removal of GMBR was 84.7–91.9%. When influent ammonia nitrogen was 28.1–38.4 mg/L, the ammonia nitrogen removal was 85.4–99.7%, and the total nitrogen removal was 41.7–78.4%. Moreover, batch experiments of sludge with different particle size demonstrated that: (1) flocculent sludge under aerobic condition almost have no denitrification capacity, (2) SND capacity was caused by the granular sludge, and (3) the denitrification rate and total nitrogen removal efficiency were enhanced with the increased particle size. In addition, study on the sludge morphology stability in GMBR showed that, although some granular sludge larger than 0.9 mm disaggregated at the beginning of operation, the granular sludge was able to maintain the stability of its granular morphology, and at the end of operation, the amount of granular sludge (larger than 0.18 mm) stabilized in GMBR was more than 56–62% of the total sludge concentration. The partial disaggregation of large granules is closely associated with the change of operating mode from sequencing batch reactor (SBR) system to MBR system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APHA (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai R, Leow HF (2002) Microfiltration of activated sludge wastewater—the effect of system operation parameters. Sep Purif Technol 29:189–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beun JJ, Hendriks A, van Loosdrecht MCM et al (1999) Aerobic granulation in a sequencing batch reactor. Wat Res 33(10):2283–2290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beun JJ, Heijnen JJ, van Loosdrecht MCM (2001) N-removal in a granular sludge sequencing batch airlift reactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 75(1):82–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beun JJ, van Loosdrecht MCM, Heijnen JJ (2002) Aerobic granulation in a sequencing batch airlift reactor. Wat Res 36(3):702–712

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chu LB, Yang FL, Zhang XW (2005) Anaerobic treatment of domestic wastewater in a membrane-coupled expended granular sludge bed (EGSB) reactor under moderate to low temperature. Process Biochem 40(3–4):1063–1070

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chu LB, Zhang XW, Yang FL et al (2006) Treatment of domestic wastewater by using a microaerobic membrane bioreactor. Desalination 189(1–3):181–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Bruin LMM, de Kreuk MK, van der Roest HFR et al (2004) Aerobic granular sludge technology: An alternative to activated sludge? Wat Sci Technol 49(11–12):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Kreuk MK, van Loosdrecht MCM (2004) Selection of slow growing organisms as a means for improving aerobic granular sludge stability. Wat Sci Technol 49(11/12):9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu LL, Wang JL, Wen XH et al (2005) The formation and characteristics of aerobic granules in sequencing batch reactor (SBR) by seeding anaerobic granules. Process Biochem 40(1):5–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jun BH, Miyanaga K, Tanji Y et al (2003) Removal of nitrogenous and carbonaceous substances by a porous carrier -membrane hybrid process for wastewater treatment. J Biochem Eng 14(1):37–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laguna A, Ouattara A, Gonzalez RO et al (1999) A simple and low cost technique for determining the granulometry of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor sludge. Wat Sci Technol 40(8):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee W, Kang S, Shin H (2003) Sludge characteristics and their contribution to microfiltration in submerged membrane bioreactors. J Membr Sci 216(1–2):217–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li XF, Gao FS, Hua ZZ et al (2005) Treatment of synthetic wastewater by a novel MBR with granular sludge developed for controlling membrane fouling. Separation and Purification Technology 46(1–2):19–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lim AL, Bai R (2003) Membrane fouling and cleaning in microfiltration of activated sludge wastewater. J Membr Sci 216:279–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Liu QS (2006) Causes and control of filamentous growth in aerobic granular sludge sequencing batch reactors. Biotechnol Adv 24:115–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Tay JH (2002) The essential role of hydrodynamic shear force in the formation of biofilm and granular sludge. Wat Res 36:1653–1665

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Tay JH (2004) State of art of biogranulation technology for wastewater treatment. Biotechnol Adv 22(7):533–563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McSwain BS, Irvine RL, Wilderer PA (2004a) The effect of intermittent feeding on aerobic granule structure. Wat Sci Technol 49(11–12):19–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McSwain BS, Irvine RL, Wilderer PA (2004b) The influence of settling time on the formation of aerobic granules. Wat Sci Technol 50(10):195–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Picioreanu C, van Loosdrecht MCM, Heijnen JJ (2000) Effect of diffusive and convective substrate transport on biofilm structure formation: a two dimensional modeling study. Biotechnol Bioeng 69:504–515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qin L, Tay JH, Liu Y (2004) Selection pressure is a driving force of aerobic granulation in sequencing batch reactors. Process Biochem 39:579–584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tay JH, Liu QS, Liu Y (2001) Microscopic observation of aerobic granulation in sequential aerobic sludge blanket reactor. J Appl Microbiol 91:168–175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk L, Roncken GCG (1997) Membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment: the state of the art and new developments. Wat Sci Technol 35:35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Du GC, Chen J (2004) Aerobic granular sludge cultivated under the selective pressure as a driving force. Process Biochem 39:557–563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JF, Wang X, Ji M et al (2006) Synchronous nitrification denitrification in granular sludge membrane bioreactor. China Environ Sci 26(4):436–440, (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang JF, Wang X, Ji M et al (2007) Sludge characteristics in a sequencing batch aerobic granular sludge membrane bioreactor. Environ Sci 28(5):1033 – 1038, (In Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilderer PA, McSwain BS (2004) The SBR and its biofilm application potentials. Wat Sci Technol 50(10):1–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang SF, Tay JH, Liu Y (2003) A novel granular sludge sequencing batch reactor for removal of organic and nitrogen from wastewater. J Biotechnol 106(1):77–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang W, Cicek N, Ilg J (2006) State-of-the-art of membrane bioreactors: worldwide research and commercial applications in North America. J Membr Sci 270(1–2):201–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeom IT, Nah YM, Ahn KH (1999) Treatment of household wastewater using an intermittently aerated membrane bioreactor. Desalination 124(1–3):193–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu T, Bishop L (1998) Stratification of microbial metabolic processes and redox potential change in an aerobic biofilm studied using microelectrodes. Water Sci Technol 37:195–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang HM, Xiao JN, Cheng YJ et al (2006) Comparison between a sequencing batch membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor. Process Biochem 41:87–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu ZZ, Zhou Y, Li XF et al (2006) Characteristics of aerobic granular sludge membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment. Environ Sci 27(1):57–62, (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Financial supports from the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2006AA06Z334), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 30600487), and the Science and Technology Development Foundation of Tianjin Higher Institute (Grant No. 20070714) were acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingfeng Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, J., Wang, X., Zhao, Z. et al. Organics and nitrogen removal and sludge stability in aerobic granular sludge membrane bioreactor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 79, 679–685 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-008-1466-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-008-1466-6

Keywords

Navigation