Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

On the mechanism of uranium binding to cell wall of Chara fragilis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Biophysics Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biosorption of uranium from nuclear waste liquids and contaminated surface waters and soils has recently attracted special interest. However, the detailed mechanism of uranium uptake by plants is not well understood. The aim of this work is to investigate the role of cell wall components of the freshwater alga Chara fragilis in uranium sequestration from its solution. Three types of algae preparations: extract of cell wall polysaccharides, dried and live algae were subjected to uranium solutions of different concentration and pH. FTIR and X-ray diffraction were used to assess both potential binding sites and the form of the uranyl sequestered by algae. Sorption of uranium by live and dry algae shows remarkable differences both in terms of overall uptake and mechanisms involved. All experiments are consistent with the conclusion that coprecipitation of uranyl species with CaCO3 is the major binding mechanism in uranium sequestration by Chara fragilis, while the direct exchange of Ca2+ with UO22+ has a minor role. Live algae are twice as efficient in sequestering uranium from solution than dried ones due to the formation of different crystalline forms such as aragonite and rutherfordine forming in live algae in the presence of the uranyl species in solution. It therefore appears that metabolic processes such as photosynthesis, most likely through the regulation of pH, play a key role in the uranium uptake by plants. Further understanding of the complex mechanism of metabolic control of the uranium uptake by plants is needed before the planning of bioremediation of this element.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aleissa KA, Shabana E-SI, Al-Masoud FIS (2004) Accumulation of uranium by filamentous green algae under natural environmental conditions. J Radioanal Nucl Ch 260:683–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen RA (ed) (2005) Algal culturing techniques. Elsevier Inc., Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Berestovsky GN, Ternovsky VI, Kataev AA (2001) Through pore diameter in the cell wall of Chara Corallina. J Exp Bot 52:1173–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhainsa KC, D’Souza SF (1999) Biosorption of uranium (VI) by Aspergillus fumigatus. Biotechnol Tech 13:695–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpita N (2007) Cell wall–ion interactions: significance for the nutrition of plants and their stress tolerance. In: Satellmacher B, Horst WJ (eds) The appoplast of higher plants: compartment of storage. Transport and Reactions Springer, Netherlands, pp 15–18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chernorukov NG, Knyazev AV, Knyazeva MA, Sergacheva IV (2002) Synthesis, structure, and physicochemical characteristics of rutherfordine and tetrasodium uranyl tricarbonate. Radiochemistry 44:212–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis TA, LLanes F, Volesky B, Mucci A (2003a) Metal selectivity of Sargassum spp. and their Alginates in relation to their r-l-guluronic acid content and conformation. Environ Sci Technol 37:261–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis TA, Volesky B, Mucci A (2003b) A review of the biochemistry of heavy metal biosorption by brown algae. Water Res 37:4311–4330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean JA (1999) Lange’s handbook of chemistry, 15 edn. McGrow-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky Z, Rotem J (1974) Relations between algal populations and the pH of their media. Oecologia 16:53–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dushenkov S, Vasudev D, Kapulnik Y, Gleba D, Fleisher D, Ting KC, Ensley B (1997) Removal of uranium from water using terrestrial plants. Environ Sci Technol 31:3468–3474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebbs SD, Brady DJ, Kochian LV (1998) Role of uranium speciation in the uptake and translocation of uranium by plants. J Exp Bot 49:1183–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg EL, Grachev MA, Bobrov VA, Bessergenev AV, Zolotaryov BV, Likhoshway YV (1998) Do diatom algae frustules accumulate uranium? Nucl Instrum Meth A 405:584–589

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalin M, Wheeler WN, Meinrath G (2005) The removal of uranium from mining waste water using algal/microbial biomass. J Environ Radioact 78:151–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MH, Warwick P, Evans N (2006) Spectrophotometric determination of uranium with arsenazo-III in perchloric acid. Chemosphere 63:1165–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Cloirec P, Guibal E, Saucedo I, Jansson-Charrier M (1995) Approach of uranium sorption mechanisms on chitosan and glutamate glucan by IR and 13C-NMR analysis. React Funct Polym 27:209–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malekzadeh F, Latifi AM, Shahamat M, Levin M, Colwell RR (2002) Effects of selected physical and chemical parameters on uranium uptake by the bacterium Chryseomonas MGF-48. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 18:599–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnaughey TA, Falk RH (1991) Calcium–proton exchange during algal calcification. Biol Bull 180:185–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamoto K (1997) Infrared and Raman spectra of inorganic and coordination compounds. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper ZA, Fry SC (2003) Primary cell wall composition of bryophytes and charophytes. Ann Bot 91:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivas BL, Pereira E, Jara M, Esparza C (2006) Resins with the ability to bind copper and uranyl ions. J Appl Polym Sci 99:706–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell AD, Emerson S, Nelson BK, Erez J, Lea DW (1993) Uranium in foraminiferal calcite as a recorder of seawater uranium concentrations. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 58:671–681

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Schiewer S, Volesky B (1995) Modeling of the proton–metal ion exchange in biosorption. Environ Sci Technol 29:3049–3058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vagenas NV, Gatsouli A, Kontoyannis CG (2003) Quantitative analysis of synthetic calcium carbonate polymorphs using FT-IR spectroscopy. Talanta 59:831–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieira RHSF, Volesky B (2000) Biosorption: a solution to pollution? Int Microbiol 3:7–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrabel J, Glynn PD (1998) User’s guide to PHRQCGRF-A computer program for graphical interpretation of PHREEQC geochemical transport simulations. Open-File Report 98-281 1-30. US Geological Survey

  • Yang J, Volesky B (1999a) Biosorption of uranium on Sargasum biomass. Water Res 33:3357–3363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Volesky B (1999b) Cadmium biosorption rate in protonated Sargassum biomass. Environ Sci Technol 33:751–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the grant no. 143016 from the Ministry of Science and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marko Daković.

Additional information

Regional Biophysics Conference of the National Biophysical Societies of Austria, Croatia, Hungary, Italy, Serbia, and Slovenia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Daković, M., Kovačević, M., Andjus, P.R. et al. On the mechanism of uranium binding to cell wall of Chara fragilis . Eur Biophys J 37, 1111–1117 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-008-0282-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-008-0282-3

Keywords

Navigation