Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of ubiquinol formation in isolated photosynthetic reaction centers by rapid-scan Fourier transform IR spectroscopy

  • Article
  • Published:
European Biophysics Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Light-induced formation of ubiquinol-10 in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers was followed by rapid-scan Fourier transform IR difference spectroscopy, a technique that allows the course of the reaction to be monitored, providing simultaneously information on the redox states of cofactors and on protein response. The spectrum recorded between 4 and 29 ms after the second flash showed bands at 1,470 and 1,707 cm−1, possibly due to a QH intermediate state. Spectra recorded at longer delay times showed a different shape, with bands at 1,388 (+) and 1,433 (+) cm−1 characteristic of ubiquinol [Mezzetti et al. FEBS Lett. 537:161–165 (2003)]. These spectra reflect the location of the ubiquinol molecule outside the QB binding site. This was confirmed by Fourier transform IR difference spectra recorded during and after continuous illumination in the presence of an excess of exogenous ubiquinone molecules, which revealed the process of ubiquinol formation, of ubiquinone/ubiquinol exchange at the QB site and between detergent micelles, and of QB and QH2 reoxidation by external redox mediators. Kinetics analysis of the IR bands allowed us to estimate the ubiquinone/ubiquinol exchange rate between detergent micelles to approximately 1 s. The reoxidation rate of QB by external donors was found to be much lower than that of QH2, most probably reflecting a stabilizing/protecting effect of the protein for the semiquinone form. A transient band at 1,707 cm−1 observed in the first scan (4–29 ms) after both the first and the second flash possibly reflects transient protonation of the side chain of a carboxylic amino acid involved in proton transfer from the cytoplasm towards the QB site.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The energy of the laser flash (approximately 20 mJ) is, however, not chosen too high in order to avoid nonlinear, biphotonic photophysical effects.

  2. With respect to the beginning of the illumination period.

  3. Attempts to improve the signal-to-noise ratio by increasing the measuring time and by sample replacement were vain; in fact, the signal-to-noise ratio in these regions is 4–5 times worse than in other spectral regions. We underline that this is an intrinsic limitation of the rapid-scan FTIR difference spectroscopy technique which is able to provide time-resolved data only with a limited signal-to-noise ratio.

  4. A definite assignment of the band to a Glu or Asp protonated side chain could be given by a clear isotopic downshift of the band when comparing spectra recorded in H2O and D2O. Indeed, comparison of the rapid-scan FTIR difference spectra recorded in D2O gave indications for a downshift of the 1,707-cm−1 band to 1,690 cm−1. However, despite long signal averaging and the use of several samples, the signal-to-noise ratio attained in both H2O and D2O FTIR difference spectra did not allow us to calculate a H2O-minus-D2O double-difference spectrum of sufficient quality to allow an unambiguous assignment.

  5. Such an effect is observed in the photosynthetic RCs from Rb. sphaeroides upon formation of the QA state (Breton et al. 1997).

  6. It should, however, be noted that the present measurements were carried out at 281 K, and not at 295 K as by Shinkarev and Wraight (1997).

  7. The bands for each of these species do not allow us to discriminate between different states, so , for instance, the 1,467 (+)-cm−1 band is characteristic of QA regardless of its specific state, i.e., it is characteristic of the sum of the RCQA , RCQA QBH2, RCQA QB , RCQA QB state. Similarly, bands at 1,388 (+) and 1,433 (+)-cm−1 are a probe to assess the concentration of ubiquinol in any of its forms (ZH2, QH2, RCQAQ B H2 and RCQA QBH2).

References

  • Adelroth P, Paddock ML, Sagle LB, Feher G, Okamura MY (2000) Identification of the proton pathway in bacterial reaction centers: both protons associated with reduction of QB to QBH2 share a common entry point. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:13086–13091

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Agostiano A, Milano F, Trotta M (1999) Investigation on the detergent role in the function of secondary quinone in bacterial reaction centers. Eur J Biochem 262:358–364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allen JP, Feher G, Yeates TO, Komyia H, Rees DC (1988) Structure of the reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26: protein-cofactors (quinones and Fe2+) interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:8487–8491

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baldini F, Domenici C, Masci D, Mencaglia A (2003) Time-resolved absorption as optical method for herbicide detection. Sens Act B 90:198–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth A (2000) The infrared absorption of amino acid side chains. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 74:141–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barth A, Zscherp C (2002) What vibrations tell us about proteins. Quart Rev Biophys 35:369–430

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baymann F, Robertson DE, Dutton PL, Mäntele W (1999) Electrochemical and spectroscopic investigations of the cytochrome bc1 complex from Rhodobacter capsulatus. Biochemistry 38:13188–13199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breton J, Nabedryk E (1996) Protein-quinone interactions in the bacterial photosynthetic reaction center: light-induced FTIR difference spectroscopy of the quinone vibrations. Biochim Biophys Acta—Bioenergetics 1275:84–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Breton J, Berthomieu C, Thibodeau DL, Nabedryk E (1991a) Probing the secondary quinone (QB) environment in photosynthetic bacterial reaction centers by light-induced FTIR difference spectroscopy. FEBS Lett 288:109–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breton J, Thibodeau DL, Berthomieu C, Mäntele W, Verméglio A, Nabedryk E (1991b) Probing the primary quinone environment in photosynthetic bacterial reaction centers by light-induced FTIR difference spectroscopy. FEBS Lett 278:257–260

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breton J, Burie J-R, Berthomieu C, Thibodeau DL, Andrianambinintsoa S, Dejonghe D, Berger G, Nabedryk E (1992a) Light-induced charge separation in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers monitored by FTIR difference spectroscopy: the QA vibrations. In: Breton J, Verméglio A (eds) The photosynthetic bacterial reaction center II. Plenum Press, New York, pp 155–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton J, Nabedryk E, Parson WW (1992b) A new electronic transition of the oxidised primary electron donor in bacterial reaction centers: a way to assess resonance interactions between the bacteriochlorophylls. Biochemistry 31:7503–7510

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breton J, Boullais C, Berger G, Mioskowsky C, Nabedryk E (1995) Binding sites of quinones in photosynthetic reaction centers investigated by light-induced FTIR difference spectroscopy: symmetry of the carbonyl interactions and close equivalence of the QB vibrations in Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Rhodopseudomonas viridis probed by isotope labelling. Biochemistry 34:11606–11616

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breton J, Nabedryk E, Allen JP, Williams JC (1997) Electrostatic influence of QA reduction on the IR vibrational mode of the 10a-ester C=O of H A demonstrated by mutations at residues Glu L104 and Trp L100 in reaction centers form Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Biochemistry 36:4515–4525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brudler R, Gerwert K (1998) Step-scan FTIR spectroscopy of the Q A QB → QAQ B transition in Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26 reaction centers. Photosynth Res 55:261–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brudler R, de Groot HJM, van Liemt WBS, Gast P, Hoff AJ, Lugtenburg J, Gerwert K (1995) FTIR spectroscopy shows weak symmetric hydrogen bonding of the QB carbonyl groups in Rhodobacter sphaeroides R26 reaction centers. FEBS Lett 370:88–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • El-Kabbani O, Chang CH, Tiede D, Norris J, Schiffer M (1991) Comparison of reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Rhodopseudmonas viridis: overall architecture and protein-pigment interactions. Biochemistry 30:5361–5369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ermler U, Fritzsch G, Buchanan S, Michel H (1994) Structure of the photosynthetic reaction centre from Rhodobacter sphaeroides at 2.65 Å resolution: cofactors and protein-cofactors interactions. Structure 2:925–936

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feher G, Allen JP, Okamura MY, Rees DC (1989) Structure and function of bacterial photosynthetic reaction centres. Nature 339:111–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsch G, Koepke J, Diem R, Kuglstatter A, Baciou L (2002) Charge separation induces conformational changes in the photosynthetic reaction centre of purple bacteria. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 58:1660–1663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerwert K (2000) Time-resolved FT-IR difference spectroscopy: a tool to monitor molecular reaction mechanisms of proteins. In: Gremlich H-U, Yan B (eds) Infrared and Raman spectroscopy of biological materials, vol 2. Marcel Dekker Inc., NY, pp 193–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Graige MS, Paddock ML, Bruce JM, Feher G, Okamura MY (1996) Mechanism of proton-coupled electron transfer for quinone (QB) reduction in reaction centers of Rb. sphaeroides.. J Am Chem Soc 118:9005–9016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Graige MS, Feher G, Okamura MY (1998) Conformational gating of the electron transfer reaction Q A QB → QAQ B in bacterial reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides determined by a driving force assay. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:11679–11684

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hellwig P, Mogi T, Tomson FL, Gennis RB, Iwata J, Myoshi H, Mäntele W (1999) Vibrational modes of ubiquinone in cytochrome bo3 from Escherichia coli identified by Fourier transform infrared difference spectroscopy and specific 13 C labeling. Biochemistry 38:14683–14689

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hienerwadel R, Thibodeau D, Lenz F, Nabedryk E, Breton J, Kreutz W, Mäntele W (1992) Time-resolved infrared spectroscopy of electron transfer in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers: dynamics of binding and interactions upon QA and QB reduction. Biochemistry 31:5799–5808

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hienerwadel R, Grzybek S, Fogel C, Kreutz W, Okamura MY, Paddock ML, Breton J, Nabedryk E, Mäntele W (1995) Protonation of Glu-L212 following Q B formation in the photosynthetic reaction center of Rhodobacter sphaeroides: evidence from time-resolved infrared spectroscopy. Biochemistry 34:2832–2843

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Isaacson RA, Lendzian F, Abresch EC, Lubitz W, Feher G (1995) Electronic structure of Q A in reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. I. Electron paramagnetic resonance in single crystals. Biophys J 69:311–322

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinfeld D, Okamura MY, Feher G (1984) Electron-transfer kinetics in photosynthetic reaction centers cooled to cryogenic temperatures in the charge-separated state: evidence for light-induced structural changes. Biochemistry 23:5780–5786

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz M, Mäntele W (1991) In: Scheer H (ed) Vibrational spectroscopy of chlorophylls. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 855–902

  • Mäntele W (1993) Reaction-induced infrared difference spectroscopy for the study of protein function and reaction mechanisms. Trends Biochem Sci 18:197–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mäntele W (1995) Infrared vibrational spectroscopy of reaction centers. In: Blankenship RE, Madigan MT, Bauer CE (eds) Anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 503–526

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson PH, Okamura MY, Feher G (1989) Electron transfer from the reaction center of Rb. sphaeroides to the quinone pool: doubly reduced QB leaves the reaction center. Biochim Biophys Acta—Bioenergetics 1016:289–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendes P (1997) Biochemistry by numbers: simulation of biochemical pathways with Gepasi 3. Trends Biochem Sci 22:361–363

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mezzetti A, Nabedryk E, Breton J, Okamura MY, Paddock ML, Giacometti G, Leibl W (2002) Rapid-scan Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy shows coupling of Glu-L212 protonation and electron transfer to QB in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers. Biochim Biophys Acta—Bioenergetics 1553:320–330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mezzetti A, Leibl W, Breton J, Nabedryk E (2003) Photoreduction of the quinone pool in the bacterial photosynthetic membrane: identification of infrared marker bands for quinol formation. FEBS Lett 537:161–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell P, Moyle J (1985) The role of ubiquinone and plastoquinone in chemiosmotic coupling between electron transfer and proton translocation. In: Lenaz G (ed) Coenzyme Q. Wiley, Chichester, pp 145–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabedryk E (1996) Light-induced Fourier transform infrared difference spectroscopy of the primary donor in photosynthetic reaction centers. In: Mantsch H, Chapman D (eds) Infrared spectroscopy of biomolecules. Wiley-Liss Inc., pp 39–81

  • Nabedryk E, Breton J, Hienerwadel R, Fogel C, Mäntele W, Paddock ML, Okamura MY (1995) Fourier transform infrared difference spectroscopy of secondary quinone acceptor in proton transfer mutants of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Biochemistry 34:14722–14732

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nabedryk E, Breton J, Okamura MY, Paddock ML (2001) Simultaneous replacement of Asp-L210 and Asp-M17 increases proton uptake by Glu-L212 upon first electron transfer to QB in reaction centers from Rhodobacter spaeroides. Biochemistry 40:13826–13832

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy L, Fodor E, Tandori J, Rinyu L, Farkas T (1999) Lipids affect the charge stabilization in wild-type and mutant reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26. Aust J Plant Physiol 26:465–443

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura C, Hasegawa M, Nakamura N, Mikaye J (2003) Rapid and specific detection of herbicides using a self-assembled photosynthetic reaction center from a purple bacterium on a SPR chip. Biosens Bioelectron 18:599–603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Okamura MY, Feher G (1995) Proton-coupled electron transfer reactions of QB in reaction centers from photosynthetic bacteria. In: Blankenship RE, Madigan MT, Bauer CE (eds) Anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria. Kluwer Academic Publisher, The Netherlands, pp 577–593

    Google Scholar 

  • Okamura MY, Paddock ML, Graige MS, Feher G (2000) Proton and electron transfer in bacterial reaction centers. Biochim Biophys Acta—Bioenergetics 1458:148–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paddock ML, Rongey SH, Feher G, Okamura MY (1989) Pathway of proton transfer in bacterial reaction centers: replacement of glutamic acid 212 in the L subunit by glutamine inhibits quinone (secondary acceptor) turnover. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:6602–6606

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paddock ML, Feher G, Okamura MY (2003) Proton transfer pathways and mechanisms in bacterial reaction centers. FEBS Lett 555:45–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peters H, Schmidt-Dannert C, Schmid RD (1997) The photoreaction center of Rhodobacter sphaeroides: a ‘biosensor protein’ for the determination of photosystem II herbicides? Mater Sci Eng C 4:227–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Port SN, Schiffrin DJ (1995) FTIR study of redox switching of pi-interactions and reorientation of adsorbed ubiquinone-10 on gold. Langmuir 11:4577–4582

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Remy A, Gerwert K (2003) Coupling of light-induced electron transfer to proton uptake in photosynthesis. Nat Struct Biol 10:637–644

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sebban P, Maroti P, Hanson DK (1995) Electron and proton transfer to the quinones in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers: insight from combined approaches of molecular genetics and biophysics. Biochimie 77:677–694

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shinkarev VP (1998) The general kinetic model of electron transfer in photosynthetic reaction centers activated by multiple flashes. Photochem Photobiol 67:683–699

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shinkarev VP, Wraight CA (1997) The interaction of quinone and detergent with reaction centers of purple bacteria. I. Slow quinone exchange between reaction center micelles and pure detergent micelles. Biophys J 72:2304–2319

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stowell MHB, McPhillips TM, Rees DC, Soltis SM, Abresch E, Feher G (1997) Light-induced structural changes in photosynthetic reaction center: implications for mechanism of electron-proton transfer. Science 276:812–816

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thibodeau DL, Nabedryk E, Hienerwadel R, Lenz F, Mäntele W, Breton J (1990) Time-resolved FTIR spectroscopy of quinones in Rb. sphaeroides reaction centers. Biochim Biophys Acta—Bioenergetics 1020:253–259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trotta M, Milano F, Nagy L, Agostiano A (2002) Response of membrane protein to the environment: the case of photosynthetic reaction centre. Mater Sci Eng C 22:263–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trumpower BL (1982) Function of quinones in energy conserving systems. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel R, Siebert F (2000) Vibrational spectroscopy as a tool for probing protein function. Curr Opin Chem Biol 4:518–523

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstock BA, Yang H, Griffiths PR (2004) Determination of the adsorption rates of aldehydes on bare and aminopropylsilyl-modified silica gels by polynomial fitting of ultra-rapid-scanning FT-IR data. Vib Spectrosc 35:145–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wraight CA (2004) Proton and electron transfer in the acceptor quinone complex of photosynthetic reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Front Biosci 9:309–337

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Oettmeier W, Gennis RB, Hellwig P (2002) FTIR spectroscopic evidence for the involvement of an acidic residue in quinone binding in cytochrome bd from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 41:4612–4617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge J. Breton and E. Nabedryk for critical reading of the manuscript and M. Paddock for fruitful discussion. A.M. acknowledges the “Guido Donegani” Foundation, Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Rome, Italy, and the “Angelo Della Riccia” Foundation, Florence, Italy, for fellowships. The investigation was partially funded by a grant from the University of Padua, Italy, within the “Progetti di ricerca per giovani ricercatori” framework. The authors acknowledge P. Mendes for the availability, free of charge, on the web of the Gepasi 3.30 software.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto Mezzetti.

Additional information

This paper is dedicated to Professor Giovanni Giacometti in occasion of his 75th birthday.

Appendix: kinetics model for continuous light excitation

Appendix: kinetics model for continuous light excitation

The overall dynamics of light-induced reactions under and after photoaccumulation conditions is the results of a series of reactions and physicochemical processes, which have been reported in the literature (Okamura et al. 2000; Shinkarev and Wraight 1997, and references therein). To describe the experimental observations it was found necessary to consider a model which consists of 12 different states connected by 18 different reactions.

As stated in the text, an essential feature of the kinetics model is the slow exchange of ubiquinone and ubiquinol molecules between different LDAO micelles (Shinkarev and Wraight 1997); see also Fig. 8. The introduction of this slow exchange in the model was necessary to account for some experimental evidence (early QA formation under continuous illumination, slow electron transfer between QA and QB after switching off the lamp).

The reactions taken into account are listed in the following, with reactions 12 and 13 describing ubiquinone/ubiquinol exchange between micelles. The symbols used are those defined in the text and in addition the following: QH2 (Q), ubiquinol (ubiquinone) in the same detergent micelle as the RC; ZH2 (Z), ubiquinol (ubiquinone) in a detergent micelle, which does not contain a RC.

1

RCQA+Q=RCQAQB

Binding equilibrium for Q in the QB binding site

2

RCQAQB+light→RCQA QB

Light-induced reduction of QA in a RC containing QB in its oxidized state

3

RCQAQB +light→RCQA QB

Light-induced reduction of QA in a RC already in a QB state

4

RCQAQBH2=RCQA+QH2

Dissociation of ubiquinol from the RC

5

RCQA+light→RCQA

Light-induced reduction of QA in a RC with an empty QB site

6

QH2→Q

Reoxidation of ubiquinol in a RC-containing detergent micelle by external acceptors

7

RCQA +Q=RCQA QB

Binding equilibrium for Q in a RC with QA in its reduced state

8

RQAQB →RQAQB

Reoxidation of QB by external acceptors

9

RCQAQBH2+light→RQA QBH2

Light-induced reduction of QA in a RC containing an ubiquinol bound to the QB site

10

RCQA QBH2=QH2+RCQA

Dissociation of ubiquinol from a RC with QA in its reduced state

11

RQAQBH2→RQAQB

Reoxidation of ubiquinol bound to a RC by external acceptors

12

Z=Q

Ubiquinone exchange between RC-containing micelles and pure detergent micelles

13

ZH2=QH2

Ubiquinol exchange between RC-containing micelles and pure detergent micelles

14

ZH2→Z

Ubiquinol reoxidation in pure detergent micelles

15

RCQA QB=RCQAQB

Electron transfer reaction between QA and QB

16

RCQA QB =RCQA QBH

Electron transfer reaction between QA and QB

17

RCQA →RCQA

Reoxidation of QA by external acceptors

18

RCQAQBH=RQAQBH2

Ubiquinol formation from QBH

The kinetics evolution of IR bands characteristic of QA, QB, and QH2 has been simulated with good accuracy (Figs. 6, 7) using rate constants and equilibrium constants from the literature (Okamura et al. 2000; McPherson et al. 1989; Shinkarev and Wraight 1997; Sebban et al. 1995 and references therein).Footnote 7 The model was found to be not very sensitive to variations in the parameter values concerning chemical reactions and substrate binding equilibria. In contrast, the ubiquinone/ubiquinol exchange rate among pure detergent micelles and RC-containing micelles turned out to be a critical parameter in shaping the kinetics profiles of transient concentrations of the chemical species involved. Indeed, these transient concentrations are very sensitive to even relatively small variations in the kinetics constants for this exchange. This permitted the rate of this exchange to be estimated to 0.5–2 s.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mezzetti, A., Leibl, W. Investigation of ubiquinol formation in isolated photosynthetic reaction centers by rapid-scan Fourier transform IR spectroscopy. Eur Biophys J 34, 921–936 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-005-0469-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-005-0469-9

Keywords

Navigation