Skip to main content
Log in

Radiation dose reduction in paediatric cranial CT

  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background. There is no consensus about the optimal milliamperage-second (mAs) settings for computed tomography (CT). Most operators follow the recommended settings of the manufacturers, but these may not be the most appropriate settings. Objective. To determine whether a lower radiation dose technique could be used in CT of the paediatric brain without jeopardising the diagnostic accuracy of the images. Materials and methods. A randomised prospective trial. A group of 53 children underwent CT using manufacturer's default levels of 200 or 250 mAs; 47 underwent scanning at 125 or 150 mAs. Anatomical details and the confidence level in reaching a diagnosis were evaluated by two radiologists in a double-blinded manner using a 4-point scoring system. Results. For both readers there was no statistically significant difference in the confidence level for reaching a diagnosis between the two groups. The 95 % confidence intervals and P values were –0.9–1.1 and 0.13 (reader 1) and –1.29–1.37 and 0.70 (reader 2), respectively. Reliability tests showed the results were consistent. Conclusions. The recommended level may not be the optimum setting. Dose reduction of 40 % is possible on our system in paediatric brain CT without affecting the diagnostic quality of the images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 21 December 1998 Accepted: 22 March 1999

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chan, CY., Wong, Yc., Chau, Lf. et al. Radiation dose reduction in paediatric cranial CT. Pediatric Radiology 29, 770–775 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002470050692

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002470050692

Keywords

Navigation