Abstract
Background
Dating fractures is critical in cases of suspected infant abuse. There are little scientific data to guide radiologists, and dating is generally based on personal experience and conventional wisdom.
Objective
Since birth-related clavicular fractures are not immobilized and their age is known, we propose that an assessment of these injuries may serve as a guide for dating inflicted fractures in young infants, acknowledging that patterns observed in the clavicle may not be entirely generalizable to other bones injured in the setting of abuse.
Materials and methods
One hundred thirty-one radiographs of presumed birth-related clavicular fractures in infants between 0 and 3 months of age were reviewed by two pediatric radiologists with 30 and 15 years’ experience. Readers were asked to evaluate images based on several parameters of fracture healing, with a focus on subperiosteal new bone formation (SPNBF) and callus formation. SPNBF and callus were each evaluated with regard to presence, thickness and character. Responses were correlated with known fracture ages.
Results
SPNBF was rarely seen in fractures less than 7 days old and was most often present by 10 days. Callus formation was rarely seen in fractures less than 9 days old and was most often present by 15 days. SPNBF thickness increased with fracture age and the character of SPNBF evolved from single-layered to solid/multilayered. Callus thickness decreased with fracture age and callus matrix evolved from soft to intermediate to hard in character.
Conclusion
There is an evolution in clavicular fracture healing in young infants that follows a predictable pattern. These findings afford the prospect that predictable patterns of infant clavicular fracture healing can provide an evidence base that may be applicable in cases of suspected infant abuse.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
O’Connor JF, Cohen J (1998) Dating fractures. In: Kleinman PK (ed) Diagnostic imaging of child abuse, 2nd edn. Mosby Year Book, Inc., St. Louis, pp 168–177
Kleinman PK, Blackbourne BD, Marks SC et al (1989) Radiologic contributions to the investigation and prosecution of cases of fatal infant abuse. N Engl J Med 320:507–511
Chapman S (1992) The radiological dating of injuries. Arch Dis Child 67:1063–1065
Duhaime AC, Alario AJ, Lewander WJ et al (1992) Head injury in very young children: mechanisms, injury types, and ophthalmologic findings in 100 hospitalized patients younger than 2 years of age. Pediatrics 90:179–185
Leventhal JM, Thomas SA, Rosenfield NS et al (1993) Fractures in young children. distinguishing child abuse from unintentional injuries. Am J Dis Child 147:87–92
Strouse PJ, Boal DKB (2013) Child abuse. In: Coley BD (ed) Caffey’s pediatric diagnostic imaging, 12th edn. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1587–1598
Ebbin AJ, Gollub MH, Stein AM et al (1969) Battered child syndrome at the Los Angeles County general hospital. Am J Dis Child 118:660–667
Akbarnia B, Torg JS, Kirkpatrick J et al (1974) Manifestations of the battered-child syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:1159–1166
Herndon WA (1983) Child abuse in a military population. J Pediatr Orthop 3:73–76
Worlock P, Stower M, Barbor P (1986) Patterns of fractures in accidental and non-accidental injury in children: a comparative study. Br Med J 293:100–102
Yeo LI, Reed MH (1994) Staging of healing of femoral fractures in children. Can Assoc Radiol J 45:16–19
Islam O, Soboleski D, Symons S et al (2000) Development and duration of radiographic signs of bone healing in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:75–78
Prosser I, Lawson Z, Evans A et al (2012) A timetable for the radiologic features of fracture healing in young children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:1014–1020
Halliday KE, Broderick NJ, Somers JM et al (2011) Dating fractures in infants. Clin Radiol 66:1049–1054
Malone CA, Sauer NJ, Fenton TW (2011) A radiographic assessment of pediatric fracture healing and time since injury. J Forensic Sci 56:1123–1130
Kleinman PK (1998) Skeletal trauma: general considerations. In: Kleinman PK (ed) Diagnostic imaging of child abuse, 2nd edn. Mosby Year Book, Inc, St. Louis, pp 8–25
Ogden JA (2000) Biology of repair of the immature skeleton. In: Ogden JA (ed) Skeletal injury in the child, 3rd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 243–268
Child Maltreatment (2011). Children’s Bureau, Administration on Children, Youth and Families. Published 2011. Available at: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/cm11.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2012.
Sarwark JF (2010) Proximal humerus, scapula, and clavicle. In: Beaty JH, Kasser JR (eds) Rockwood and Wilkins’ fractures in children, 7th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 625–626
Cumming WA (1979) Neonatal skeletal fractures. birth trauma or child abuse? Can Assoc Radiol J 30:30–33
Sanchez TR, Nguyen H, Palacios W et al (2013) Retrospective evaluation and dating of non-accidental rib fractures in infants. Clin Radiol 68:467–471
ACR-SPR (1997) Practice guideline for skeletal surveys in children. The American College of Radiology Published 1997. Revised 2011. Available at: http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/PGTS/guidelines/Skeletal_Surveys.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2012.
Conflicts of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Walters, M.M., Forbes, P.W., Buonomo, C. et al. Healing patterns of clavicular birth injuries as a guide to fracture dating in cases of possible infant abuse. Pediatr Radiol 44, 1224–1229 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-2995-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-2995-z