Abstract
Congenital skeletal abnormalities compose a heterogeneous and complex group of conditions that affect bone growth and development and result in various anomalies in shape and size of the skeleton. Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of these anomalies is challenging because of the relative rarity of each skeletal dysplasia, the multitude of differential diagnoses encountered when the bony abnormalities are identified, lack of precise molecular diagnosis and the fact that many of these disorders have overlapping features and marked phenotypic variability. The following review is a preliminary summary of our experience at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) using low-dose fetal CT in the evaluation of severe fetal osseous abnormalities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Krakow D, Lachman RS, Rimoin DL (2009) Guidelines for the prenatal diagnosis of fetal skeletal dysplasias. Genet Med 11:127–133
Schramm T, Gloning KP, Minderer S et al (2009) Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of skeletal dysplasias. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34:160–170
Rimoin DL, Cohn D, Krakow D et al (2007) The skeletal dysplasias: clinical-molecular correlations. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1117:302–309
Krakow D, Alanay Y, Rimoin LP et al (2008) Evaluation of prenatal-onset osteochondrodysplasias by ultrasonography: a retrospective and prospective analysis. Am J Med Genet A 146A:1917–1924
Bowerman RA (1995) Anomalies of the fetal skeleton: sonographic findings. AJR 164:973–979
Doray B, Favre R, Viville B et al (2000) Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of skeletal dysplasias. A report of 47 cases. Ann Genet 43:163–169
Parilla BV, Leeth EA, Kambich MP et al (2003) Antenatal detection of skeletal dysplasias. J Ultrasound Med 22:255–258, quiz 259–261
Suzumura H, Kohno T, Nishimura G et al (2002) Prenatal diagnosis of hypochondrogenesis using fetal MRI: a case report. Pediatr Radiol 32:373–375
Yazici Z, Kline-Fath BM, Laor T et al (2010) Fetal MR imaging of Kniest dysplasia. Pediatr Radiol 40:348–352
Miller E, Blaser S, Miller S et al (2008) Fetal MR imaging of atelosteogenesis type II (AO-II). Pediatr Radiol 38:1345–1349
Brunelle F, Sonigo P, Simon I (2003) Fetal CT. Childs Nerv Syst 19:415–417
Ruano R, Molho M, Roume J et al (2004) Prenatal diagnosis of fetal skeletal dysplasias by combining two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound and intrauterine three-dimensional helical computer tomography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 24:134–140
Cassart M, Massez A, Cos T et al (2007) Contribution of three-dimensional computed tomography in the assessment of fetal skeletal dysplasia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29:537–543
Slovis TL (2002) The ALARA concept in pediatric CT: myth or reality? Radiology 223:5–6
McCollough CH, Schueler BA, Atwell TD et al (2007) Radiation exposure and pregnancy: when should we be concerned? Radiographics 27:909–917, discussion 917–918
Wagner LK, Hayman LA (1982) Pregnancy and women radiologists. Radiology 145:559–562
Huda W, Ovid Technologies Inc. Review of radiologic physics. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, pp xv, 255
Goncalves LF, Espinoza J, Mazor M et al (2004) Newer imaging modalities in the prenatal diagnosis of skeletal dysplasias. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 24:115–120
Schumacher R, Spranger JW, Seaver LH (2004) Fetal radiology: a diagnostic atlas. Springer, Berlin, New York
Partrick ME, Baker ER, Crow HC (1999) Abnormal skull shape in intrauterine growth retardation: report of two cases. J Ultrasound Med 18:161–163
Disclaimer
The supplement this article is part of is not sponsored by the industry. Dr. Victoria, Dr. Epelman, Dr. Bebbington, Dr. Johnson, Dr. Kramer, Dr. Wilson, and Dr. Jaramillo have no financial interest, investigational or off-label uses to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Victoria, T., Epelman, M., Bebbington, M. et al. Low-dose fetal CT for evaluation of severe congenital skeletal anomalies: preliminary experience. Pediatr Radiol 42 (Suppl 1), 142–149 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2175-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2175-3