Skip to main content
Log in

Pediatric abdominal CT angiography

  • Review
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Advancing multidetector technology offers opportunities for improved vascular assessment in children. Much of what is available deals with thoracic and central nervous system applications, with very little written about abdominal applications. That said, many of the technical aspects are similar to computed tomography (CT) angiography in these regions and are worthy of reviewing, in addition to those unique considerations for abdominal CT angiography (CTA) in children. Familiarity with appropriate abdominal CTA for pediatric multidetector array CT will provide the same opportunities as CTA in other regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chan F, Jaffe R, Condon V, Frush D (2008) Congenital great vessels abnormalities. In: Slovis T (ed) Caffey’s pediatric diagnostic imaging, vol 1. 11th edn. Mosby Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 1591–1604

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chan FP, Donovan D (2008) Acquired great vessel abnormalities. In: Slovis T (ed) Caffey’s pediatric diagnostic imaging, vol 1. 11th edn. Mosby Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 1667–1686

    Google Scholar 

  3. Towbin AJ, Newman B (2008) Syndromes and chromosomal anomalies. In: Slovis T (ed) Caffey’s pediatric diagnostic imaging, vol 1. 11th edn. Mosby Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 1605–1631

    Google Scholar 

  4. Frush DP (2008) Pediatric cardiothoracic CT angiography. In: Slovis T (ed) Caffey’s pediatric diagnostic imagins, vol 1. 11th edn. Mosby Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 1486–1490

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frush DP, Herlong RJ (2005) Pediatric thoracic CT angiography. Pediatr Radiol 35:11–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Frush DP (2005) Technique of pediatric thoracic CT angiography. Radiol Clin North Am 43(2):419–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Racadio JM, Babic D, Homan R et al (2007) Live 3D guidance in the interventional radiology suite. Am. J. Roentgenol 189:W357–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hollingsworth CL, Frush DP, Yoshizumi TT et al (2007) Pediatric cardiac-gated CT angiography: assessment of radiation dose. AJR 189:12–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Slovis TL, Frush DP, Berdon WE et al (2007) Biological effects of diagnostic radiation on children. In: Slovis T (ed) Caffey’s pediatric diagnostic imaging. 11thth edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 3–12

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. NEJM 357:2277–2284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Amis ES Jr, Butler PF, Applegate KE et al (2007) American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol 4:272–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Frush DP, Yoshizumi T (2006) Conventional and CT angiography in children: dosimetry and dose comparisons. Pediatr Radiol 36(14):154–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Thomas KE, Wang BB (2008) Age-specific effective doses for Pediatric MSCT examinations at a large children’s hospital using DLP conversion coefficients; a simple estimation method. Pediatr Radiol (in press)

  14. Huda W (2008). Computing effective doses to pediatric patients undergoing body CT examinations. Pediatr Radiol (in press)

  15. Dillman JR, Strouse PJ, Ellis JH et al (2007) Incidence and severity of acute allergic-like reactions to IV nonionic iodinated contrast material in children. AJR 188:1643–1647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gaca AM, Frush DP, Hohenhaus S et al (2007) Enhancing pediatric safety: using simulation to assess radiology resident preparedness for anaphylaxis from intravenous contrast media. Radiology 245:236–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chan FP, Rubin GD (2005) MDCT angiography of pediatric vascular diseases of the abdomen, pelvis, and extremities. Pediatr Radiol 35:40–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Siegel MJ (2005) Pediatric CT angiography. Eur Radiol 15:Suppl 4:D32–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Long FR, Castile RG, Brody AS et al (1999) Lungs in infants and young children: improved thin-section computed tomography with a noninvasive controlled-ventilation technique: initial experience. Radiology 212:588–593

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaste S, Laningham F, Stazzone M, Brown SD, Emery K, Newman B, Frush DP (2007) Safety in pediatric MR and cardiac CT. Pediatr Radiol 37:409–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cohen RA, Frush DP, Donnelly LF (2000) Data acquisition for pediatric CT angiography: problems and solutions. Pediatr Radiol 30:813–822

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cohen MD, Smith JA (1994) Intravenous use of ionic and nonionic contrast agents in children. Radiology 191:793

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fleischmann D (2003) Use of high-concentration contrast media in multiple-detector-row CT: principles and rationale. Eur Radiol 13(Suppl 5):M14–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Frush DP (2008) MDCT in Children: Scan Techniques and Contrast Issues. In MDCT: A practical approach. Eds Kalra MK, Saini S, Rubin GD. Springer (in press)

  25. Frush DP (2006) Categorical Course in Physics: Radiation Dose and Image Quality for Pediatric CT: clinical considerations. Radiological Society of North American 167–182

  26. van der Molen AJ, Geleijns J (2007) Overranging in multisection CT: quantification and relative contribution to dose-comparison of four 16-section CT scanners. Radiology 242:208–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Geleijns J, Salvadó Artells M, Veldkamp WJ et al (2006) Quantitative assessment of selective in-plane shielding of tissues in computed tomography through evaluation of absorbed dose and image quality. Eur Radiol 16:2334–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Coursey C, Frush D, Yoshizumi T, Toncheva G et al (2008) Pediatric chest MDCT and tube current modulation: effect on radiation dose with breast shielding. AJR 190:54–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL et al (2004) Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. Radiology 233:649–657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. McCollough CH, Bruesewitz MR, Kofler JM Jr (2006) CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. Radiographics 26:503–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald P. Frush.

Additional information

Dr. Frush has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships or potential conflicts of interest: GE Healthcare, Grant Support, Principal Investigator.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frush, D.P. Pediatric abdominal CT angiography. Pediatr Radiol 38 (Suppl 2), 259–266 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-0795-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-0795-z

Keywords

Navigation