Skip to main content
Log in

The frontosphenoidal suture: fetal development and phenotype of its synostosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Isolated synostosis of the frontosphenoidal suture is very rare and difficult to diagnose. Little has been reported on the clinical presentation and fetal development of this suture.

Objective

To understand the development of the frontosphenoidal suture and the outcome of its synostosis.

Materials and methods

We studied the normal fetal development of the frontosphenoidal suture in dry human skulls and the clinical features of four patients with isolated synostosis of the frontosphenoidal suture.

Results

The frontosphenoidal suture develops relatively late during the second trimester of pregnancy, which explains the mild phenotype when there is synostosis. This rare craniosynostosis results in a deformity that causes recession of the lateral part of the frontal bone and supraorbital rim, with minimal facial asymmetry. Three-dimensional CT is the best examination to confirm the diagnosis.

Conclusion

Isolated frontosphenoidal synostosis should be considered in patients with unilateral flattening of the forehead at birth that does not improve within the first few months of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Seeger JF, Gabrielsen TO (1971) Premature closure of the frontosphenoidal suture in synostosis of the coronal suture. Radiology 101:631–635

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dundulis JA, Becker DB, Govier DP et al (2004) Coronal ring involvement in patients treated for unilateral coronal craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1695–1703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rogers GF, Mulliken JB (2005) Involvement of the basilar coronal ring in unilateral coronal synostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:1887–1893

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Francel PC, Park TS, Marsh JL et al (1995) Frontal plagiocephaly secondary to synostosis of the frontosphenoidal suture. J Neurosurg 83:733–736

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rogers GF, Proctor MR, Mulliken JB (2002) Unilateral fusion of the frontosphenoidal suture: a rare cause of synostotic frontal plagiocephaly. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:1011–1021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mathijssen IM, Vaandrager JM, van der Meulen JC et al (1996) The role of bone centers in the pathogenesis of craniosynostosis: an embryologic approach using CT measurements in isolated craniosynostosis and Apert and Crouzon syndromes. Plast Reconstr Surg 98:17–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mathijssen IM, van Splunder J, Pieterman H et al (1999) Tracing craniosynostosis to its developmental stage through bone center displacement. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 19:57–63

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Dries van Dam, conservator of the Museum of Anatomy of the Leiden University Medical Centre, for allowing us to use the fetal skeletons.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irene M. J. Mathijssen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mathijssen, I.M.J., van der Meulen, J.J.N.M., van Adrichem, L.N.A. et al. The frontosphenoidal suture: fetal development and phenotype of its synostosis. Pediatr Radiol 38, 431–437 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-0750-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-0750-z

Keywords

Navigation