Abstract
Background: The definition of normal values is a prerequisite for the reliable evaluation of abnormality in the lumbar spine, such as spinal canal stenosis or dural ectasia in patients with Marfan syndrome. Values for vertebral body diameter (VBD) and dural sac diameter (DSD) for the lumbar spine have been published in adults. In children, normal values have been established using conventional radiography or myelography, but not by MRI. Objective: To define normal values for the sagittal diameter of the vertebral body and dural sac, and to calculate a dural sac ratio (DSR) in the lumbosacral spine (L1–S1) in healthy children using MRI. Materials and methods: A total of 75 healthy children between 6 years and 17 years of age were examined using a sagittal T2-weighted sequence. Sagittal VBD and DSD were measured and a DSR was calculated. This was a retrospective and cross-sectional study. Results: With increasing age there is a significant increase of VBD, a slight increase of DSD, and a slight decrease of DSR. There is no significant sex difference. DSR in healthy children is higher than in healthy adults. Conclusions: MRI is a reliable method demonstrating the natural shape of the lumbosacral spine and its absolute values. These normal values compare well with those established by conventional radiological techniques. Our data may serve as a reference for defining dural ectasia in children with Marfan syndrome.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hinck VC, Hopkins CE, Clark WM (1965) Sagittal diameter of the lumbar spinal canal in children and adults. AJR 96:929–937
Larsen JK, Smith D (1981) The lumbar spinal canal in children. Part 1: the sagittal diameter. Eur J Radiol 1:163–170
Boltshauser E, Hoare RD (1976) Radiographic measurements of the normal spinal cord in childhood. Neuroradiology 10:235–237
Fattori R, Nienaber CA, Descovich B et al (1999) Importance of dural ectasia in phenotypic assessment of Marfan’s syndrome. Lancet 354:910–913
Jamjoom ZA, Malabarey T, Kolawole TM et al (1990) Lumbosacral dural anomalies in von Recklinghausen neurofibromatosis. Acta Neurochir 105:140–146
Schonauer C, Tessitore E, Frascadore L et al (2000) Lumbosacral dural ectasia in type 1 neurofibromatosis. Report of two cases. J Neurosurg Sci 44:165–168
Katz SG, Grunebaum M, Strand RD (1978) Thoracic and lumbar dural ectasia in a two-year-old boy. Pediatr Radiol 6:238–240
Huizinga J, Heiden JA, Vinken PJ (1951) The human lumbar vertebral canal. A biometric study. P K Ned Akad Wetensc 55:22–33
Eisenstein S (1977) The morphometry of pathological anatomy of the lumbar spine in South African negroes and caucasoids with specific reference to spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 59:173–180
Papp T, Porter RW, Aspden RM (1994) The growth of the lumbar vertebral canal. Spine 19:2770–2773
Brandner ME (1970) Normal values of the vertebral body and intervertebral disk index during growth. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 110:618–627
Oosterhof T, Groenink M, Hulsmans FJ et al (2001) Quantitative assessment of dural ectasia as a marker for Marfan syndrome. Radiology 220:514–518
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Knirsch, W., Kurtz, C., Häffner, N. et al. Normal values of the sagittal diameter of the lumbar spine (vertebral body and dural sac) in children measured by MRI. Pediatr Radiol 35, 419–424 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-004-1382-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-004-1382-6