Abstract
Clinical trials are abundant in adult cardiovascular medicine; however, they are rare in pediatric cardiology. Pediatric cardiac trial design may be impacted by the heterogeneous nature of the underlying cardiac defects, as well as by a strong emotional response from parents whose child will undergo a surgical intervention. The purpose of this study was to assess factors that may have an impact on parents considering enrollment of their child in a clinical trial at the time of surgical intervention. A voluntary, self-administered questionnaire (14 questions) was provided to parents of children 16 years of age or younger during the preadmission testing period. Demographic and procedure-related variables were collected for each patient. A total of 119 surveys were analyzed over a 1.5-year period. Only 8% of the parents had their child participate in a clinical trial in the past. Fifty-six percent of the parents preferred that their child’s cardiologist or surgeon explain clinical trial details, with 23% preferring the principal investigator and 3% preferring the research coordinator. Fifty percent of the parents were favorably disposed to participate in a clinical trial if the drug or device was currently used by their child’s doctor, and 19% were encouraged to participate if the drug or device was approved for use in adults. The majority of parents (64%) preferred to be asked about participating in a trial within 1 month prior to the planned procedure, and 40% preferred to discuss trial details at a remote time in an outpatient location. Sixty-three percent of parents believed that most of the medications currently used in children were already approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Most parents (91%) believed that clinical trials conducted in children will help improve pediatric health care; 74% believed that their child may receive potential benefit from enrolling in a trial. Finally, 43% believed that funding for trials should come from government and health care agencies, as opposed to pharmaceutical companies (24%). This survey reveals the importance of the attending physician and timing in educating parents regarding a cardiac critical care clinical trial. These data may impact the design and successful conduct of future trials.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerman TF (2001) The ethics of drug research in children. Paediatr Drugs 3:29–41
Barfield RC, Church C (2005) Informed consent in pediatric clinical trials. Curr Opin Pediatr 17:20–24
Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act (2002). Public Law 107–109
Caldwell PH, Murphy SB, Butow PN, Craig JC (2004) Clinical trials in children. Lancet 364:803–811
Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997. Public Law 105–115
Hoehn KS, Nelson RM (2004) Advising parents about children’s participation in clinical research. Pediatr Ann 33:778–781
Hoehn KS, Wernovsky G, Rychik J, et al. (2005) What factors are important to parents making decisions about neonatal research? Arch Dis Childhood Fetal Neonatal Ed 90:F267–F269
Pediatric Research Equity Act of 2003. Public Law 108–155
Rothmier JD, Lasley MV, Shapiro GG (2003) Factors influencing parental consent in pediatric clinical research. Pediatrics 111:1037–1041
Salazar JC (2003) Pediatric clinical trial experience: government, child, parent and physician’s perspective. Pediatr Infect Dis J 22:1124–1127
Tait AR, Voepel-Lewis T, Malviya S (2003) Participation of children in clinical research: factors that influence a parent’s decision to consent. Anesthesiology 99:819–825
Tait AR, Voepel-Lewis T, Siewert M, Malviya S (1998) Factors that influence parents’ decisions to consent to their child’s participation in clinical anesthesia research. Anesth Analg 86:50–53
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hoffman, T., Taeed, R., Niles, J. et al. Parental Factors Impacting the Enrollment of Children in Cardiac Critical Care Clinical Trials. Pediatr Cardiol 28, 167–171 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-006-0020-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-006-0020-5