Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an effective treatment for kidney stones in infants under 1 year of age. A single-center experience

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Urolithiasis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We aimed to present the outcomes of PNL surgery performed in infantile patients with small renal stones who were younger than 1 year of age. A single-center prospective trial was initiated and during the period between Jan 2013 and Jan 2015, PNL was applied to 20 renal units of 16 infants (6 girls and 10 boys), including 4 patients with bilateral kidney stones. PNL was performed in patients with renal stones larger than 2 cm, as well as stones resistant to SWL or renal stones that were undetectable during SWL. The mean age of the patients was 9.55 (5–12) months. Of the 20 renal units, 1 had complete staghorn stones, 3 had partial staghorn stones, 13 had renal pelvic stones, and 3 had lower pole stones. The mean stone size was 18.5 mm (range 12–36 mm). Mean operative time for PNL was 88 (25–135 min). Mean fluoroscopy time was estimated as 3.4 min. Mean hemoglobin loss was 0.72 g/L (0.2–3). The mean hospital stay was 4.1 days (2–8 days). On postoperative day 1, a complete stone-free state was achieved in 70 % of renal units (14 of 20). At the end of the first postoperative week, the remaining two patients had insignificant residual fragments of 3 mm and were followed conservatively without any specific intervention. Thus, the total SFR was 80 % (16 of 20) at discharge. In infants aged less than 1 year, minimal access tract dilation during PNL, the use of smaller caliber pediatric instruments, and the realization of this procedure by surgeons with adequate experience in adults carry utmost importance. In addition, special care should be taken to avoid hypothermia and radiation exposure during PNL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akinci M, Esen T, Tellaloglu S (1991) Urinary stone disease in Turkey: an updated epidemiological study. Eur Urol Eur Urol 20(3):200–203

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baştuğ F, Gündüz Z, Tülpar S et al (2013) Urolithiasis in infants: evaluation of risk factors. World J Urol 31(5):1117–1122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Holman E, Khan AM, Flasko T et al (2004) Endoscopic management of pediatric urolithiasis in a developing country. Urology 63(1):159–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Choong S, Whitfield H, Duffy P et al (2000) The management of paediatric urolithiasis. BJU Int 86(7):857–860

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Altintas R, Oguz F, Tasdemir C et al (2014) The importance of instrument type in paediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urolithiasis 42(2):149–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zeng G, Zhao Z, Zhao Z et al (2012) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants: evaluation of a single-center experience. Urology 80(2):408–411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Etemadian M, Maghsoudi R, Shadpour P et al (2012) Pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy using adult sized instruments: our experience. Urol J 9(2):465–471

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Erdenetsesteg G, Manohar T, Singh H et al (2006) Endourological management of pediatric urolithiasis: proposed clinical guidelines. J Endourol 20(10):737–748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jackman SV, Hedican SP, Peters CA et al (1998) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants and preschool age children: experience with a new technique. Urology 52(4):697–701

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Penbegul N, Soylemez H, Bozkurt Y et al (2012) An alternative and inexpensive percutaneous access needle in pediatric patients. Urology 80(4):938–940

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bilen CY, Gunay M, Ozden E et al (2010) Tubeless mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants and preschool children: a preliminary report. J Urol 184(6):2498–2502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gnessin E, Chertin L, Chertin B (2012) Current management of paediatric urolithiasis. Pediatr Surg Int 28(7):659–665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Giraudon A, Richard E, Godron A et al (2014) Clinical and biochemical characterization of childhood urolithiasis. Arch Pediatr 21(12):1322–1329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Söylemez H, Sancaktutar AA, Altunoluk B et al (2012) Re: radiation protection in pediatric radiology. Urol Res 40(5):621–622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Penbegül N, Tepeler A, Sancaktutar AA et al (2012) Safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of urinary stone disease in children. Urology 79(5):1015–1019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Unsal A, Resorlu B, Kara C et al (2010) Safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants, preschool age, and older children with different sizes of instruments. Urology 76(1):247–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bodakci MN, Daggülli M, Sancaktutar AA et al (2014) Minipercutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants: a single-center experience in an endemic region in Turkey. Urolithiasis 42(5):427–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mirza S, Panesar S, AuYong KJ et al (2007) The effects of irrigation fluid on core temperature in endoscopic urological surgery. J Perioper Pract 17(10):494–497

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tekgul ZT, Pektas S, Yildirim U et al (2014) A prospective randomized double-blind study on the effects of the temperature of irrigation solutions on thermoregulation and postoperative complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Anesth

  20. Roberts S, Bolton DM, Stoller ML (1994) Hypothermia associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 44(6):832–835

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vorrakitpokatorn P, Permtongchuchai K, Raksamani EO et al (2006) Perioperative complications and risk factors of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Med Assoc Thai 89(6):826–833

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Erdenetsesteg G, Manohar T, Singh H et al (2006) Endourological management of pediatric urolithiasis: proposed clinical guidelines. J Endourol 20(10):737–748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kapoor R, Solanki F, Singhania P et al (2008) Safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the pediatric population. J Endourol 22(4):637–640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Guven S, Istanbulluoglu O, Ozturk A et al (2010) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is highly efficient and safe in infants and children under 3 years of age. Urol Int 85(4):455–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bilen CY, Koçak B, Kitirci G et al (2007) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: lessons learned in 5 years at a single institution. J Urol 177(5):1867–1871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Goktug HN, Yesıl S, Ozturk U et al (2013) Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: selecting for success in children. Adv Clin Exp Med 22(4):565–570

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gupta NP, Kesarwani P, Goel R et al (2005) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. A comparative study with standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Int 74:58–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mansur Dağgülli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dağgülli, M., Sancaktutar, A.A., Dede, O. et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an effective treatment for kidney stones in infants under 1 year of age. A single-center experience. Urolithiasis 43, 507–512 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-015-0787-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-015-0787-z

Keywords

Navigation