Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The effect of sucralfate, an agent for gastroprotection on the healing of split thickness skin graft donor sites

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Skin is the most commonly used tissue for the transplantation. A meticulous care of the donor site is needed to prevent scarring, delayed healing, and pain. Various agents and dressing materials have been reported to help healing of skin graft donor sites. Sucralfate is an extensively used agent, which provides acute gastroprotection and acceleration of chronic ulcer healing. In this study, we assessed the effects of topical sucralfate on the healing of the split thickness skin graft donor sites in a prospective comparative way. The study was carried out on 32 randomly chosen patients undergoing surgery for various causes and requiring split thickness skin graft resurfacing. The upper halves of the skin graft donor sites on the thighs were simply covered with paraffin gauze and the lower half was covered with sucralfate-soaked paraffin gauzes. The day of full epithelization varied from 6 to 9 days and 8–12 days on the sucralfate-applied areas and on the control sites, respectively. The mean value of the healing was 7.01 days in the studied lower halves and 10.8 days in the upper halves. The healing rate was strikingly faster and less painful on the sucralfate-applied areas. We were able to discharge patients earlier than usual, and patients’ comfort increased. It seems that sucralfate is a promising topical agent to increase the healing rate and decrease the incidence of associated problems such as pain and hypertrophic scar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akan M (2003) Ice application to minimize pain in the split thickness skin graft donor site. Aesthet Plast Surg 27:305–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Atwood Al (1989) Calcium alginate dressing accelerates split skin graft donor site healing. Br J Plast Surg 42:373–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barnea Y, Amir A, Leshem D, Zaretski A, Weiss J, Shafir R, Gur E (2004) Clinical comparative study of aquacel and paraffin gauze dressing for split-skin donor site treatment. Ann Plast Surg 53:132–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cadier MA (1996) Dermasorb versus Jelonet in patients with burns skin graft donor sites. J Burn Care Rehabil 17:246–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chuenkongkaew T (2003) Modification of split-thickness skin graft: cosmetic donor site and better recipient site. Ann Plast Surg 50(2):212–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Converse JM (1944) The healing of surface cutaneous wounds: its analogy with the healing of superficial wounds. Ann Surg 120:873

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Disa JJ, Alizadeh K, Smith JW, Hu Q, Cordeiro PG (2001) Evaluation of a combined calcium sodium alginate and bio-occlusive membrane dressing in the management of split-thickness skin graft donor sites. Ann Plast Surg 46:405–408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Folkman J, Klagsburn M (1987) Angiogenic factors. Science 235:442–447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Glise H, Carling L, Hallerbeck B, Kagevi I, Solhaug JH, Svedberg LE, Wahlby L (1987) Treatment of peptic ulcers—acid reduction or cytoprotection. Scand J Gastroenterol 22:39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hallock G (1999) The cosmetic split thickness skin graft donor site. Plast Reconstr Surg 104(7):2286–2288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hollander D (1987) Sucralfate protection of the gastric mucosa mediated by endogenous prostaglandins. In: Szabo S, Mozsik G (eds) New pharmacology of ulcer disease: experimental and new therapeutic approaches. Elsevier, NewYork, pp 404–412

    Google Scholar 

  12. Innes ME (2001) The use of silver coated dressings on donor site wounds: a prospective, controlled matched pair study. Burns 27:621–627

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jones PH (1995) Stem cell patterning and fate in human epidermis. Cell 80:83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kiline H (2001) Which dressing for split thickness graft donor sites? Ann Plast Surg 46(4):409–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lacey ER (1984) Rapid epithelial restitution in the rat gastric mucosa after ethanol injury. Lab Invest 51:573–583

    Google Scholar 

  16. Losada F (2002) Effects of human recombinant growth hormone on donor site healing in burned adults. World J Surg 26:2–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Malpass KG (2003) Comparison of donor site healing under Xeroform and Jelonet dressings: unexpected findings. Plast Reconstr Surg 112(2):430–439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Misirlioglu A (2003) Use of honey as an adjunct in the healing of split thickness skin graft donor site. Dermatol Surg 29:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ozcan M, Altuntas A, Unal A, Nalca Y, Aslan A (1998) Sucralfate for posttonsillectomy anesthesia. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 119(6):700–704

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sawhney CP (1969) Healing of donor sites of split skin grafts: an experimental study in pigs. Br J Plast Surg 22:359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stone CA (2000) Healing at skin graft donor sites dressed with chitosan. Br J Plast Surg 53:601–606

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Szabo S (1991) The mode of action of sucralfate: the 1 × 1 × 1 mechanism of action. Scand J Gastroenterol 26(suppl. l85):7–12

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tytgat GNJ (1990) Future potential applicability of sucralfate in gastroenterology. Scand J Gastroenterol 25:34–38

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yamamoto E (1987) Effects of sucralfate on healing of chronic gastric ulcers in rats. In: Szabo S, Mozsik G. (eds) New pharmacology of ulcer disease: experimental and new therapeutic approaches. Elsevier, NewYork, pp 413–423

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Diskapi Yıldırım Beyazıt Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

    Birol Civelek, H. İbrahim Inal, Kubilay Ozdil & Selim Celebioglu

  2. Birlik Mah. Zirvekent, 435. Cad. 52/50 Cankaya, Ankara, Turkey

    Birol Civelek

Authors
  1. Birol Civelek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. İbrahim Inal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kubilay Ozdil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Selim Celebioglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Birol Civelek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Civelek, B., Inal, H.İ., Ozdil, K. et al. The effect of sucralfate, an agent for gastroprotection on the healing of split thickness skin graft donor sites. Eur J Plast Surg 30, 25–28 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-007-0140-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-007-0140-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation