Skip to main content
Log in

Application of diffusion-weighted imaging combined with apparent diffusion coefficient in differential diagnosis between central neurocytoma and ependymoma

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Differential diagnosis between central neurocytoma and ependymoma is very important for making preoperative scheme. We explored the application of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) combined with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in differential diagnosis between both.

Methods

The data of preoperative MR plain and contrast-enhanced scan, DWI and ADC values of neoplastic solid parts from 18 cases with central neurocytoma and 19 cases with lateral ventricular ependymoma, were retrospectively analyzed. Mann-Whitney test was used for the comparison of ADC values between central neurocytoma and ependymoma. The application of ADC values in the differential diagnosis between central neurocytoma and ependymoma was evaluated by ROC curve.

Results

The lesions showed hyperintensity-dominant mixed signal intensity on DWI and mean ADC was (0.65 ± 0.13) × 10−3 mm2/s in the 18 cases with central neurocytoma. In the 19 cases with ependymoma, 13 had hyperintensity-dominant mixed signal intensity on DWI and 6 had hypointensity-dominant mixed signal intensity on DWI, and mean ADC was (1.20 ± 0.23) × 10−3 mm2/s. The mean ADC value was significantly higher in the 19 cases with ependymoma than in the 18 cases with central neurocytoma (P < 0.001). The ADC of 0.87 × 10−3 mm2/s might be used as a threshold for differential diagnosis between central neurocytoma and ependymoma with an area under ROC curve of 0.98 ± 0.02 and a 95% confidence interval of 0.95–1.00. Its sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 90%, 100%, and 90%, respectively.

Conclusion

There is a certain overlap in MRI imaging features between central neurocytoma and ependymoma. DWI combined with ADC value can improve peoperative diagnostic accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yang I, Ung N, Chung LK, Nagasawa DT, Thill K, Park J, Tenn S (2015) Clinical manifestations of central neurocytoma. Neurosurg Clin N Am 26:5–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lejeune JP, Reyns N, Baroncini M, Peltier J, Le Gars D (2011) Ependymomas of the lateral ventricle. A series of 27 cases with review of the literature. Neurochirurgie 57:206–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jaiswal S, Vij M, Rajput D, Mehrotra A, Jaiswal AK, Srivastava AK, Behari S, Krishnani N (2011) A clinicopathological, immunohistochemical and neuroradiological study of eight patients with central neurocytoma. J Clin Neurosci 18:334–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sun S, Wang J, Zhu M, Beejadhursing R, Gao P, Zhang X, Jiao L, Jiang W, Ke C, Shu K (2018) Clinical, radiological, and histological features and treatment outcomes of supratentorial extraventricular ependymoma: 14 cases from a single center. J Neurosurg 128:1396–1402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, Jouvet A, Scheithauer BW, Kleihues P (2007) The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 114:97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Thompson YY, Ramaswamy V, Diamandis P, Daniels C, Taylor MD (2015) Posterior fossa ependymoma: current insights. Childs Nerv Syst 31:1699–1706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Kleihues P, Ellison DW (2016) The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 131:803–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Muly S, Liu S, Lee R, Nicolaou S, Rojas R, Khosa F (2018) MRI of intracranial intraventricular lesions. Clin Imaging 52:226–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen H, Zhou R, Liu J, Tang J (2012) Central neurocytoma. J Clin Neurosci 19:849–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tlili-Graiess K, Mama N, Arifa N, Kadri K, Hasni I, Krifa H, Mokni M (2014) Diffusion weighted MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopy findings of central neurocytoma with pathological correlation. J Neuroradiol 41:243–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Delmaire C, Boulanger T, Leroy HA, Tempremant F, Pruvo JP (2011) Imaging of lateral ventricle tumors. Neurochirurgie 57:180–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Al-Sharydah AM, Al-Arfaj HK, Saleh Al-Muhaish H, Al-Suhaibani SS, Al-Aftan MS, Almedallah DK, Al-Abdulwahhab AH, Al-Hedaithy AA, Al-Jubran SA (2019) Can apparent diffusion coefficient values help distinguish between different types of pediatric brain tumors? Eur J Radiol Open 6:49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Soni N, Srindharan K, Kumar S, Bhaisora KS, Kalita J, Mehrotra A, Mishra P (2018) Application of diffusion tensor imaging in brain lesions: a comparative study of neoplastic and non-neoplastic brain lesions. Neurol India 66:1667–1671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bulakbasi N, Guvenc I, Onguru O, Erdogan E, Tayfun C, Ucoz T (2004) The added value ofthe apparent diffusion coefficient calculation to magneticresonance imaging in the differentiation and grading of malignant braintumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:735–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Stadnik TW, Chaskis C, Michotte A, Shabana WM, van Rompaey K, Luypaert R, Budinsky L, Jellus V, Osteaux M (2001) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of intracerebral masses: comparison with conventional MR imaging and histologic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:969–976

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee EJ, terBrugge K, Mikulis D, Choi DS, Bae JM, Lee SK, Moon SY (2011) Diagnostic value of peritumoral minimum apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiation of glioblastoma multiforme from solitary metastatic lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:71–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang CY, Cheng JL, Nie YF, Pang BB, Yan J, Song YM (2015) The diagnostic value of ADC combined with DWI in the differentiation of the central neurocytoma and ependymoma. Radiol Practice 30:1011–1015

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chen C , Ren CP , Zhao RC , Ding JW , Cheng JL. Histogram Analysis Parameters ADC for Distinguishing Ventricular Neoplasms of Ependymoma, Choroid Plexus Papilloma, and Central Neurocytoma.Med Sci Monit. 2019 Aug 7;25:5886-5891. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.915398

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peng-fei Sun.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study has been approved by the ethics committee of Second Hospital Affiliated to Lanzhou University.

Informed consent

The patients reported in this study gave written informed consent to participate.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, Pf., Ma, L., Ye, Bq. et al. Application of diffusion-weighted imaging combined with apparent diffusion coefficient in differential diagnosis between central neurocytoma and ependymoma. Neuroradiology 62, 439–445 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-019-02342-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-019-02342-6

Keywords

Navigation