Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fate of the abstracts presented at three Spanish clinical pharmacology congresses and reasons for unpublished research

  • Special Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the publication rate of abstracts at 5 years after their presentation at three consecutive clinical pharmacology congresses and to examine the reasons relating to the lack of publication.

Methods

Oral and poster presentations from the congresses of the Spanish Society of Clinical Pharmacology (SSCP) in 1994, 1996, and 1998 were reviewed. Authors were contacted to determine the fate of their presented studies and the reasons for not publishing them. Publications of abstracts with unknown fate were searched the in PubMed database. Determinants of publication were examined by Cox regression.

Results

In all, 248 abstracts were analysed. The cumulative publication rate at 5 years was 26%, and the median time for publication was 18 months (range: 2–60). The European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology was the English language medical journal where most abstracts were published. The median impact factor of the articles published was 1.96 (range: 0.29–8.32). The author survey identified a lack of time (38.2%) and a lack of interest (33.3%) as the main reasons for failure to publish. The only predictor of an abstract’s publication was to be affiliated with a university department (hazard ratio: 1.98, 95% confidence interval: 1.20–3.27).

Conclusions

Only one-quarter of the abstracts presented at SSCP congresses were subsequently published. A lack of time and interest were the main reasons given for not submitting these presentations for publication. Authors, scientific societies and editorial boards should enhance publications as full papers in peer-reviewed journals of the abstracts presented at meetings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chalmers I (1990) Underreporting research is scientific misconduct. JAMA 263:1405–1408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Von Elm E, Costanza MC, Walder B, Tramèr MR (2003) More insight into the fate of biomedical meeting abstracts: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 3:12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kelly JA (1998) Scientific meeting abstracts: significance, access, and trends. Bull Med Libr Assoc 86:68–76

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stolk P, Egberts ACG, Leufkens HGM (2002) Fate of abstracts presented at five International Conferences on Pharmacoepidemiology (ICPE): 1995–1999. Pharmacoepidem Dr S 11:105–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. XII Congreso de la SEFC. Cádiz 23–25 Marzo 1994

  6. (1996) Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 18(Suppl):57–61

  7. (1998) Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 20(Suppl):49–60

  8. Journal Citation Reports 2002 (http://go5.isiknowledge.com/portal.cgi)

  9. Science Citation Index Expanded (http://go5.isiknowledge.com/portal.cgi) August, 2004

  10. Scherer RW, Langenberg P (2004) Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (Cochrane Methodology Review). The Cochrane Library, issue 3. Wiley, Chichester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  11. Byerly WG, Rheney CC, Connelly JF, Verzino KC (2000) Publication rates of abstracts from two pharmacy meetings. Ann Pharmacother 34:1123–1127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Callaham ML, Wears RL, Weber EJ, Barton C, Young G (1998) Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting. JAMA 280:254–257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. van der Steen LP, Hage JJ, Loonen MP, Kon M (2004) Full publication of papers presented at the 1995 through 1999 European Association of Plastic Surgeons annual scientific meetings: a systemic bibliometric analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:113–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Roy D, Sankar V, Hughes JP, Jones A, Fenton JE (2001) Publication rates of scientific papers presented at the Otorhinolaryngological Research Society meetings. Clin Otolaryngol 26:253–256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Scherer R, Dickersin K, Langenberg P (1994) Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis. JAMA 272:158–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Eloubeidi MA, Wade SB, Provenzale D (2001) Factors associated with acceptance and full publication of GI endoscopic research originally published in abstract form. Gastrointest Endosc 53:275–282

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cielsa MC, Wojcik EM (2001) Outcomes of cytopathology studies presented at national pathology meetings. Diagn Cytopathol 25:265–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Walby A, Kelly AM, Georgakas C (2001) Abstract to publication ratio for papers presented at scientific meetings: how does emergency medicine compare? Emerg Med 13:460–464

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bydder SA, Joseph DJ, Spry NA (2004) Publication rates of abstracts presented at annual scientific meetings: how does the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists compare? Australas Radiol 48:25–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ng L, Hersey K, Fleshner N (2004) Publication rate of abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the American Urological Association. BJU Int 94:79–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Herbison P (2004) Full publication of abstracts of randomised controlled trials published at International Continence Society meetings’. Neurourol Urodyn 23:101–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jasko JJ, Wood JH, Schwartz HS (2003) Publication rates of abstracts presented at annual musculoskeletal tumor society meetings. Clin Orthop 415:98–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Timmer A, Hilsden RJ, Cole J, Hailey D, Sutherland LR (2002) Publication bias in gastroenterological research—a retrospective cohort study based on abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting. BMC Med Res Methodol 2(1):7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Timmer A, Blum T, Lankisch PG (2001) Publication rates following pancreas meeting. Pancreas 23:212–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yoo S, Oh G, Wang JC (2002) Publication rates of presentations made at annual meetings of the American Orthopaedics Society for Sports Medicine and the Arthroscopy Association of North America. Am J Orthop 31:367–369

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Carroll AE, Sox CM, Tarini BA, Ringold S, Christakis DA (2003) Does presentation format at the Paediatric Academic Societies’ annual meeting predict subsequent publication? Pediatrics 112:1238–1241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sanders DS, Carter MJ, Hurlstone DP, Lobo AJ, Hoggard N (2001) Research outcomes in British gastroenterology: an audit of the subsequent full publication of abstracts presented at the British Society of Gastroenterology. Gut 49:154–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sanz E (2005) Pharmacoepidemiology and the “impact factor.” Eur J Clin Pharmacol 60:765–772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Weber EJ, Callaham ML, Wears RL, Barton C, Young G (1998) Unpublished research from a medical specialty meeting. Why investigators fail to publish. JAMA 280:257–259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gilbert WM, Pitkin RM (2004) Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine meeting presentations: what gets published and why? Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:32–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dickersin K, Min YI, Meinert CL (1992) Factors influencing publication of research results. Follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boards. JAMA 267:374–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Krzyzanowska MK, Pintilie M, Tannock IF (2003) Factors associated with failure to publish large randomised trials presented at an oncology meeting. JAMA 290:495–501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sprague S, Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Swiontkowski MF, Torneta P, Cook DJ et al (2003) Barriers to full-text publication following presentation of abstracts at annual orthopaedic meetings. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:158–163

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hashkes P, Uziel Y (2003) The publication rate of abstracts from the 4th Park City Pediatric Rheumatology meeting in peer-reviewed journals: what factors influenced publications? J Rheumatol 30:597–602

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Arrive L, Dono P, Lewin M, Dahan H, Monnier-Cholley L, Tubiana JM (2001) Publication rate of original papers orally presented at the Journées Françaises de Radiologie 1996. J Radiol 82:1719–1722

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Castillo J, Cifuentes I, García-Guasch R (2000) Publications derived from free communications at the XX Congress of the Anesthesiology and Resuscitation Spanish Association (Anesthesia 92). Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 47:53–56

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kiroff GK (2001) Publication bias in presentations to the annual scientific congress. ANZ J Surg 71:167–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Larian B, Namazie A, Agha N, Azizzadeh B, Blackwell K, Wang MB (2001) Publication rate of abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125:166–169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Li SF, Unemoto T, Crosley P, Cassidy C (2004) SAEM abstracts to articles: 1997 and 1999–2001. Acad Emerg Med 11:985–987

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Arrive L, Boelle PY, Dono P, Lewin M, Monnier-Cholley L, Tubiana JM (2004) Subsequent publication of orally presented original studies within 5 years after 1995 RSNA Scientific Assembly. Radiology 232:101–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH, DJ Cook, Swiontkowski MF, Sprague S et al (2002) An observational study of orthopaedic abstracts and subsequent full-text publications. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:615–621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Castillo J, García-Guasch R, Cifuentes I (2002) Fate of abstracts from the Paris 1995 European Society of Anaesthesiologists meeting. Eur J Anaesthesiol 19:888–893

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Jackson KR, Daluiski A, Kay RM (2000) Publication of abstracts submitted to the annual meeting of the Pediatric Orthopedic Society of North America. J Pediatr Orthop 20:2–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Davies MW, Dunster KR, East CE, Lingwood B (2002) Fate of abstracts published in the proceedings of the first annual Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand Congress in 1997. J Paediatr Child Health 38:501–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Riordan FAI (2000) Do presenters to paediatric meeting get their work published? Arch Dis Child 83:524–526

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Perez S, Hashkes PJ, Uziel Y (2004) The impact of the annual scientific meetings of the Israel Society of Rheumatology as measured by publication rates of the abstracts in peer-reviewed journals. Harefuah 143:266–269

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support was provided by the AstraZeneca Foundation, Spain. The conception, methods, analysis and publication of the present study have been independent from the funding source.

We would like to thank the Sociedad Española de Farmacología Clínica for assisting us with many of the authors’ electronic addresses. We would specially like to thank Albert Figueras MD for his participation in the design of the study, and Luisa Ibáñez MD for her comments in reviewing the manuscript.

We are most grateful to all the authors for their collaboration in the study responding to our enquiry: Aguilera C, Aguirre C, Agustí A, Albet C, Aguado A, Armijo JM, Arnaiz JA, Arnau JM, Artigas R, Bayés MC, Boada J, Bonet S, Carcas A, Carvajal A, Cereza G, Colomé E, de Cos MA, Dal-Ré R, Danés I, Delgadillo J, Esteban C, Farré M, Ferrer P, Figueiras A, Figueras A, Fuentes I, García JA, García J, Gich I, Guerrero A, Hereu P, Hernández C, Ibáñez C, Ibáñez L, Ignacio JM, López L, Lucena MI, Martínez MJ, Mas M, Mateu S, Mediavilla A, Merino N, Montero D, Morros R, Pedromingo A, Pita E, Planas E, Pontes C, Portoles A, Rodríguez C, Rodríguez D, Saldaña M, Sánchez S, Sánchez de la Cuesta F, Sanz E, Sendrós S, Sinués B, Terleira A, Torelló J, Torres F, Valiente R, Vedia C, Verdejo A, Zapata A.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fundació Institut Català de Farmacologia Departament de Farmacologia, de Terapèutica i de Toxicologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08035, Barcelona, Spain

    E. Montané & X. Vidal

  2. Servei de Farmacologia Clínica, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Pg Vall d’Hebron, nº 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain

    E. Montané & X. Vidal

Authors
  1. E. Montané
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. X. Vidal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Montané.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Montané, E., Vidal, X. Fate of the abstracts presented at three Spanish clinical pharmacology congresses and reasons for unpublished research. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 63, 103–111 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-006-0235-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-006-0235-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation