Abstract
Fast, accurate and thorough assessments of meiofaunal communities are crucial requirements for ecological studies and routine monitoring of ecosystem status. This study scrutinizes the reliability of the molecular approach through a comparison of morphological and molecular inventories of meiofaunal diversity, with a special focus on nematodes. Sediment samples were collected from a reference coastal Mediterranean site. Metabarcoding analysis was performed using a nuclear marker (small subunit 18S ribosomal RNA) and compared to a morphological analysis performed on the same sample-cores. The results from morphological and molecular inventories differed but were complementary. The molecular analysis revealed a remarkable level of diversity (16 phyla) that exceeded the traditional morphological analysis (10 phyla), showing that meiofaunal diversity can greatly exceed current perceptions. The molecular method proved powerful in detecting the presence of soft-bodied predators, such as Platyhelminthes, possibly reflecting preservation bias in morphological approaches. Even if the molecular inventory identified 57.5% of the sampled diversity, surprisingly, it has not revealed the presence of some nematode genera identified through morphological assessment. While the technique is promising, some further developments are required. As the dominant genus Sabatieria was undetected by the molecular approach, despite being present in the Silva database, improving the knowledge of specific primers should be a priority. Additionally, with 77% of nematode OTUs remaining unassigned at genera level, remedy this lower efficiency requires further investigations to provide DNA-sequences of all morphologically identified species.
References
Bik HM, Way S, de Lay P et al (2012) Metagenetic community analysis of microbial eukaryotes illuminates biogeographic patterns in deep-sea and shallow water sediments. Mol Ecol 21:1048–1059
Bonaglia S, Nascimento FJA, Bartoli M, Klawonn I, Brüchert V (2014) Meiofauna increases bacterial denitrification in marine sediments. Nat Commun 5:1–9
Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J et al (2010) QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7:335–336
Clarke KR, Warwick RM (2001) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. PRIMER-E, Plymouth
Coissac E, Riaz T, Puillandre N (2012) Bioinformatic challenges for DNA metabarcoding of plants and animals. Mol Ecol 21:1834–1847
Cowart DA, Pinheiro M, Mouchel O et al (2015) Metabarcoding is powerful yet still blind: a comparative analysis of morphological and molecular surveys of seagrass communities. PLoS One 10(2):e0117562. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117562
Creer S, Fonseca VG, Porazinska DL et al (2010) Ultrasequencing of the meiofaunal biosphere: practice, pitfalls and promises. Mol Ecol 19:4–20
Curini-Galletti M, Artois T, Delogu V et al (2012) Patterns of diversity in soft-bodied meiofauna: dispersal ability and body size matter. PLoS One 7(3):e33801. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033801
Dafforn KA, Baird DJ, Chariton AA et al (2014) Faster, higher and stronger? The pros and cons of molecular faunal data for assessing ecosystem condition. Adv Ecol Res 51:1–40
Danovaro R, Tselepides A, Otegui A, Della Crose N (2000) Dynamics of meiofaunal assemblages on the continental shelf and deep-sea sediments of the Cretan Sea (NE Mediterranean): relationships with seasonal changes in food supply. Prog Oceanogr 46:367–400
Dell’Anno A, Carugati L, Corinaldesi C, Riccioni G, Danovaro R (2015) Unveiling the biodiversity of deep-sea nematodes through metabarcoding: are we ready to bypass the classical taxonomy? PLoS One 10(12): e0144928. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144928
DeLong EF, Preston CM, Mincer T et al (2006) Community genomics among stratified microbial assemblages in the ocean’s interior. Science 311:496–503
Dong D, Yan A, Liu H, Zhang X, Xu Y (2006) Removal of humic substances from soil DNA using aluminium sulphate. J Microbiol Methods 66:217–222
Edgar RC, Haas JB, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R (2011) UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27:2194–2200
Fauvel P (1923) Polychaetes errantes. Fauna de France, Fédération Française des Sociétés de Sciences Naturelles
Fonseca VG, Carvalho GR, Sung W et al (2010) Second-generation environmental sequencing unmasks marine metazoan biodiversity. Nat Commun 1:1–8
Fonseca VG, Carvalho GR, Nichols B et al. (2014) Metagenetic analysis of patterns of distribution and diversity of marine meiobenthic eukaryotes. Glob Ecol and Biogeogr 23:1293–1302
Giere O (2009) Meiobenthology: the microscopic motile fauna of aquatic sediments. Springer, Berlin
Grémarre A, Madernach L, De Bovée F et al (2002) Relationships between sedimentary organics and benthic meiofauna on the continental shelf and the upper slope of the Gulf of Lions (NW Mediterranean). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 234:85–94
Guille A (1970) Bionomie benthique du plateau continental de la côte catalane française. II- Les communautés de la macrofaune. Vie & Milieu 21:149–280
Guille A (1971) Bionomie benthique du plateau continental de la côte catalane française IV-Densités, biomasses et variations saisonnières de la macrofaune. Vie & Milieu 22:93–158
Guille A, Soyer J (1968) La faune benthique des substrats meubles de Banyuls-sur-Mer. Premières données qualitatives et quantitatives. Vie & Milieu 19:323–360
Guille A, Soyer J (1974) Bionomie benthique du plateau continental de la côte catalane française. Macrofaune et méiofaune, rapports quantitatifs et biocénotiques. Vie & Milieu 24:301–320
Hadziavdic K, Lekang K, Lanzen A et al (2014) Characterization of the 18S rRNA Gene for designing universal eukaryote specific primers. PLoS One 9(2):e87624. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087624
Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4(1): 9
Heip C, Vincx M, Vranken G (1985) The ecology of marine nematodes. Oceanogr Mar Biol 23:399–489
Higgins RP, Thiel H (1988) Introduction to the study of meiofauna. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington
Huys R, Gee JM, Moore CG, Hamond R (1996) Marine and brackish water Harpacticoid Copepods part 1. Synopses of the British fauna (new series), no. 51. The Linnean Society of London and The Estuarine and Coastal Sciences Association, Field Studies Council Shrewsbury, UK
Ingels J, Vanreusel A (2013) The importance of different spatial scales in determining structural and functional characteristics of deep-sea infauna communities. Biogeosciences 10:4547–4563
Ingels J, Van den Driessche P, De Mesel I et al (2010) Preferred use of bacteria over phytoplankton by deep-sea nematodes in polar regions. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 406:121–133
Labrune C, Grémare A, Guizien K, Amouroux JM (2007) Long-term comparison of soft bottom macrobenthos in the Bay of Banyuls-sur-Mer (north-western Mediterranean Sea): a reappraisal. J Sea Res 58:125–143
Lallias D, Hiddink JG, Fonseca VG et al. (2015) Environmental metabarcoding reveals heterogeneous drivers of microbial eukaryote diversity in contrasting estuarine ecosystems. Intl Soc Microbial Ecol 9:1208–1221
Lambshead PJD, Boucher G (2003) Marine nematode deep-sea biodiversity-hyperdiverse or hype? J Biogeogr 30:475–485
Lang K (1975a) Monographie der Harpacticiden, 1. Otto Koeltz, Koenigstein
Lang K (1975b) Monographie der Harpacticiden, 2. Otto Koeltz, Koenigstein
Lejzerowicz F, Esling P, Pillet L et al. (2015) High-throughput sequencing and morphology perform equally well for benthic monitoring of marine ecosystems. Sci Rep 5:1–10. doi:10.1038/srep13932
Li J, Vincx M, Herman PMJ, Heip C (1997) Monitoring meiobenthos using cm-, m- and km-scales in the Southern Bright of the North Sea. Mar Environl Res 43:265–278
Nascimento FJA, Näslund J, Elmgren R (2012) Meiofauna enhances organic matter mineralization in soft sediment ecosystems. Limnol Oceanogr 57:338–346
Ondov BD, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM (2011) Interactive metagenomic visualization in a Web browser. BMC Bioinf 12:1–9
Pawlowski J, Christen R, Lecroq B et al (2011) Eukaryotic richness in the abyss: insights from pyrotag sequencing. PLoS One 6(4):e18169. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018169
Platt HM, Warwick RM (1983) Free living marine nematodes. Part I. British Enoplids. Synopses of the British fauna (new series), no. 28. The Linnean Society of London and The Estuarine and Coastal Sciences Association, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Platt HM, Warwick RM (1988) Free living marine nematodes. Part II. British Chromadorids. Synopses of the British fauna (new series), no. 38. The Linnean Society of London and The Estuarine and Coastal Sciences Association, E.J. Brill/Dr W. Backhuys, Leiden, New York, Kobenhavn, Köln
Platt HM, Warwick RM, Somerfiels PJ (1988) Free living marine nematodes. Part III. Monhysterids. Synopses of the British fauna (new series), no. 53. The Linnean Society of London and The Estuarine and Coastal Sciences Association, Field Studies Council Shrewsbury, UK
Porazinska DL, Giblin-Davis RM, Faller L et al (2009) Evaluating high-throughput sequencing as a method for metagenomic analysis of nematode diversity. Mol Ecol Resour 9:1439–1450
Quince C, Lanzen A, Davenport RJ, Turnbaugh PJ (2011) Removing noise from pyrosequenced amplicons. BMC Bioinform 12:1–18
Rothberg JM, Leamon JH (2008) The development and impact of 454 sequencing. Nat Biotechnol 26:1117–1124
Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T et al (2009) Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Mocrobiol 75:7537–7541
Snelgrove PVR (1999) Getting to the bottom of marine biodiversity: sedimentary habitats—ocean bottoms are the most widespread habitat on Earth and support high biodiversity and key ecosystem services. Bioscience 49:129–138
Sogin ML, Morrison HG, Huber JA et al (2006) Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the underexplored ‘rare biosphere’. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:12115–12120
Soyer J (1970) Bionomie benthique du plateau continental de la côte catalane française. III. Les peuplements de Copepodes harpacticoides (Crustacea). Vie milieu 21:337–511
Soyer J (1971) Bionomie benthique du plateau continental de la cote catalane Frangaise. V. Densites et biomasses du meiobenthos. Vie Milieu 22:351–424
Soyer J (1974) Contribution à l’étude des Copépodes Harpacticoïdes de Méditerranée occidentale. Vie Milieu 24:379–408
Tang CQ, Leasi F, Obertegger U et al (2012) The widely used small subunit 18 S rDNA molecule greatly underestimates true diversity in biodiversity surveys of the meiofauna. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 40:16208–16212
Westheide W (1990) Polychaetes : Interstitial families. Synopses of the British fauna (new series), no. 44. The Linnean Society of London and The Estuarine and Coastal Sciences Association, Universl Book Services/Dr W. Backhuys, Oegstgeest
Winnepenninckx B, Backeljau T, De Wachter R (1993) Extraction of high-molecular-weight DNA from molluscs. Trends Genet 9:407
Acknowledgements
This research received support from CNRS as the APEGE programme (incentive funds from the Institute of Ecology and Environment - InEE). Additional support was obtained from the chair of biodiversity, extreme marine environments and global change supported by Foundation TOTAL. We acknowledge Hervé Moreau for his support and stimulating discussions, Nigel Grimsley and Wiley Edition Services for English correction. We thank Jean-Claude Roca and Bruno Hesse, the scuba divers, and the R/V crew Nereis II of the Observatoire Océanologique in Banyuls-sur-Mer. We thank anonymous reviewers for improvement of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
This study was partly funded by the chair of biodiversity supported by Foundation TOTAL (J091I006).
Conflict of interest
All authors declared they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: M. Huettel.
Reviewed by D. Cowart and an undisclosed expert.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
227_2017_3074_MOESM2_ESM.pdf
SI_2 dataset: Datasets obtained from molecular and morphological approaches: presence/absence of genera, list of nematode genera/species and their relative abundance identified by the morphological approach (PDF 73 KB)
227_2017_3074_MOESM3_ESM.pdf
SI_3 table 1: Comparison of morphological and DNA-based approach datasets (96% cut off) for the metazoans; the total number of OTUs or individuals, phyla / orders or classes and genera (PDF 69 KB)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rzeznik-Orignac, J., Kalenitchenko, D., Mariette, J. et al. Comparison of meiofaunal diversity by combined morphological and molecular approaches in a shallow Mediterranean sediment. Mar Biol 164, 40 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-017-3074-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-017-3074-4