Abstract
This study investigated the use of monoethanolamine (Mea) solution to extract copper from alkaline copper quat (ACQ)-treated wood. Mea could extract more than 90 % of copper from ACQ-treated wood. The formation of stable neutral Cu(Mea)2 in Mea solution is the main mechanism for Mea extraction. The effects of process parameters: pH, Mea concentration and temperature were also studied. Higher Mea solution pH resulted in higher Cu extraction efficiencies until pH 10. Cu extraction efficiency increased moderately to 10 % Mea concentration but not significantly above this. Mea (10–15 %) extraction at the original pH (around 12) was fast, and the effect of extraction temperature was insignificant for small particles of treated wood and detrimental for larger pieces. Based on empirical data and application of theoretical diffusion models with larger specimens, extraction was faster in the longitudinal direction than for the other wood directions. Since the extract solution containing ACQ components can potentially be reused as fresh treating solution after the proper supplement of Cu–amine solution, this approach is the most straightforward procedure for the recycling of chemicals removed from ACQ-treated wood.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aksu S, Doyle FM (2002) Electrochemistry of copper in aqueous ethylenediamine solutions. J Electrochem Soc 149:340–347
AWPA-Standard (2006a) Method for analysis of wood and solutions by atomic absorption spectroscopy. A11-93. American Wood Protection Association, Birmingham
AWPA-Standard (2006b) Processing and treatment standard. P5. American Wood Protection Association, Birmingham
AWPA-Standard (2006c) Processing and treatment standard. T1-06
Casassas E, Gustems LL, Tauler R (1989) Spectrophotometric study of complex formation in copper(II) mono-, di-, and tri-ethanolamine systems. J Chem Soc Dalton Trans 4:569–573
Cooper PA (1994) Leaching of CCA: is it a problem? In: Environmental considerations in the manufacture, use and disposal of preservative-treated wood. Forest Products Society, Madison, Wisconsin pp 45-57
Crank J (1975) The mathematics of diffusion. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Cui W (1999) Biological performance of cuprous and cupric copper against wood decay fungi. M.Sc. Thesis. Department of Forestry, University of Michigan
Davies CW, Patel VC (1963) Some copper(II) complexes with bases. J Am Chem Soc 75:4716–4719
Gezer ED, Cooper PA (2009) Factors affecting sodium hypochlorite extraction of CCA from treated wood. Waste Manag 29(12):3009–3013
Gezer ED, Yildiz UC, Temiz A, Yildiz S, Dizman E (2005) Cu, Cr and As distribution in soils adjacent to CCA-treated utility poles in Eastern Blacksea Region of Turkey. Build Environ 40(12):1684–1688
Hancock RD (1981) The chelate effect in complexes with ethanolamine. Inorg Chim Acta 49:145–148
Hata T, Bronsveld PM, Vystavel T, Kooi BJ, Hosson JM, Kakitani T, Otono A, Imamura Y (2003) Electron microstudy on pyrolysis of CCA (chromium, copper and arsenic oxide)-treated wood. J Anal Appl Pyrol 68–69:635–643
Hauer H, Billo EJ, Margerum DW (1970) Ethylenediamine and diethylenetriamine reactions with copper(II)-triglycine. J Am Chem Soc 93(17):4173–4178
Helsen L, Van den Bulck E, Cooreman H, Vandecasteels C (2003) Development of a sampling train for arsenic in pyrolysis vapours resulting from pyrolysis of arsenic containing wood waste. J Environ Monit 5:758–765
Hirata T, Inoue M, Fukui Y (1993) Pyrolysis and combustion toxicity of wood treated with CCA. Wood Sci Technol 27:35–47
Honda A, Kanjo Y, Kimoto A, Koshii K, Kashiwazaki S (1991) Recovery of copper, chromium, and arsenic compounds from the waste preservative-treated wood. International Research Group on Wood preservation, IRG/WP/91-3651
Kakitani T, Hata T, Kajimot T, Imamura Y (2004) Effect of pyrolysis on solvent extractability of toxic metals from chromated copper arsenate (CCA)-treated wood. J Hazard Mater 109:53–57
Kakitani T, Hata T, Kajimot T, Imamura Y (2006) A novel extractant for removal of hazardous metals from preservative-treated wood waste. J Environ Qual 35:912–917
Kartal SN (2003) Removal of copper, chromium, and arsenic from CCA-C treated wood by EDTA extraction. Waste Manag 23:537–546
Kazem EA (2002) Recovery and reuse of the wood and chromated copper arsenate (CCA) from CCA treated wood, a technical paper
Kazi F, Cooper PA (1998) Solvent extraction of CCA-C from out-of-service wood. International Research Group on Wood Preservation, Doc IRG/WP 98-50107
Kazi F, Cooper PA (1999) Recovery and reuse of chromated copper arsenate (CCA) wood preservative from CCA treated wastes. Presented at 20th annual Canadian wood preservation association conference, Vancouver BC, 25–26 Oct 1999, 20:45–67
Kumbhar AG, Kishore K (2003) Redox reactions of Cu(II)-amine complexes in aqueous solutions. Radiat Phys Chem 66:275–280
Lee M-J, Cooper P (2010) Effect of amine ligand, copper/amine ratio, and pH on copper adsorption into wood. Holzforschung 64:659–665
Li Y, Trush MA (1993) Oxidation of hydroquinone by copper: chemical mechanism and biological effects. Arch Biochem Biophys 300:346–355
Lin L, Hse C-Y (2005) Liquefaction of CCA-treated wood and elimination of metals from the solvent by precipitation. Holzforschung 59:285–288
Marko E, Giles PR, Tsukazaki M, Bron SM, Urch CJ (1996) Copper-catalyzed oxidation of alcohols to aldehydes and ketones: an efficient, aerobic alternative. Science 274:2044–2046
Nurmi AJ (1996) Disposal of CCA treated waste wood by combustion: an industrial scale trial. International Research Group on Wood Preservation, Document IRG/WP 96-50068
Shiau RJ, Smith RL, Avellar B (2000) Effects of stream explosion processing and organic acids on CCA removal from treated wood waste. Wood Sci Technol 34:377–388
Shupe TF, Hse CY (2006) Recycling of preservative-treated wood using chemical extraction technologies. In: Townsend T, Solo-Gabriele H (eds) Environment impact of preservative-treated wood. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 383–400
Shupe TF, Hse CY, Roliadi H (2006) Removal of creosote from wood particles at different horizontal and vertical locations of decommissioned poles using steam treatment. Wood Fiber Sci 38:345–350
Sierra-Alvarez R (2009) Removal of copper, chromium and arsenic from preservative-treated wood by chemical extraction-fungal bioleaching. Waste Manag 29(6):1885–1891
Smith RL, Shiau RJ (1996) Steam processing of treated waste wood for CCA removal: identification of opportunities for re-use of the recovered fiber. $Virginia Polytechnic University, Department of Wood Science and Forest Products, Blacksburg, VA
Tascioglu C, Cooper P, Ung T (2008) Effects of fixation temperature and environment on copper speciation in ACQ treated red pine. Holzforschung 62(3):289–293
Tauler R, Casassas E (1986) The complex formation of Cu(II) with mono- and di-ethanolamine in aqueous solution. Inorg Chim Acta 114:203–209
Virkutyte J, Velizarova E, Ribeiro AB, Sillanpaa M (2005) Copper and chromium electrodialytic migration in CCA-treated timber waste. Water Air Soil Pollut 160:27–39
Waldron L, Cooper PA, Ung YT (2005) Diffusion modeling of inorganic wood preservative leaching in service. Environment and wood preservation. In: 6th International symposium, Cannes-Mandelieu France, 7–8 Feb 2005, Doc, IRG/WP 05-50224:5
Wang JS, Chiu KH (2008) Extraction of chromated copper arsenate from wood wastes using green solvent supercritical carbon dioxide. J Hazard Mater 158:384–391
Wu Q, Yao F, Ragon K, Curole J, Votiller M, Shupe T (2010) Extruded wood plastic composites based on ACQ and MCQ-treated wood materials. IRG/WP 10-40495
Yu L, Cao J, Cooper PA, Tang Z (2009) Effects of hot water posttreatment on accelerating copper fixation in ACQ-D-treated Chinese fir. Wood Fiber Sci 41(3):236–244
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge the funding support for this project by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and Timber Specialties Ltd., Campbellville, Ontario, Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, G., Cooper, P. Remediation of ACQ-treated wood waste by Mea extraction. Wood Sci Technol 49, 303–317 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-015-0704-1
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-015-0704-1