Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Peripheral Bone Status in Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluated by Digital X-Ray Radiogrammetry and Compared with Multisite Quantitative Ultrasound

  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of secondary osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has recently become well recognized, characterized by demineralization at axial and in particular periarticular peripheral bone sites. Our aim was to evaluate multisite quantitative ultrasound (QUS) compared to digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR) by the quantification of cortical bone loss dependent on the severity of RA. Fifty-three patients with verified RA underwent QUS measurements (Sunlight Omnisense 7000) with estimation of the speed of sound (QUS-SOS) at the distal radius and at the phalanx of the third digit. Also, bone mineral density (DXR-BMD) and metacarpal index (DXR-MCI) were estimated on metacarpals II-IV using DXR technology. Additionally, Larsen score and Steinbroker stage were assessed. Disease activity of RA was estimated by disease activity score 28 (DAS 28). For the group with minor disease activity (3.2 ≤ DAS ≤ 5.1), QUS-SOS (phalanx) showed a significant association to DXR-BMD (R = 0.66) and DXR-MCI (R = 0.52). In the case of accentuated disease activity (DAS > 5.1), QUS-SOS of the radius revealed a significant correlation to DXR-BMD (R = 0.71) and DXR-MCI (R = 0.84), whereas for QUS-SOS (phalanx) no significant association to the DXR parameters was shown. The DXR parameters and, to a lesser extent, the QUS data also demonstrated pronounced declines in the case of accentuated disease activity (DAS > 5.1). Both DXR-BMD (−25.9 %, P < 0.01) and DXR-MCI (−38.6 %, P < 0.01) revealed a notable reduction dependent on the severity of RA. Otherwise, QUS-SOS marginally decreased, with −2.6% (radius) and −3.9% (phalanx). DXR revealed a significant reduction of DXR-BMD as well as DXR-MCI dependent on the severity of RA and surpassed multisite QUS as a promising diagnostic tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brower AC (1990) Use of the radiograph to measure the course of rheumatoid arthritis. The gold standard versus fool’s gold. Arthritis Rheum 33:316–324

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gough AK, Lilley J, Eyre S, Holder RL, Emery P (1994) Generalized bone loss in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 344:23–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hulsmans HMJ, Jacobs JWG, van der Heijde DMFM, van Albada-Kuipers GA, Schenk Y, Bijlsma JWJ (2000) The course of radiologic damage during the first six years of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 43:1927–1940

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Deodhar AA, Brabyn J, Jones BW, Davis MJ, Woolf AD (1995) Longitudinal study of hand bone densitometry in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 37:1204–1210

    Google Scholar 

  5. Peel NF, Spittlehouse AJ, Bax DE, Eastell R (1994) Bone mineral density of the hand in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 37:983–991

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dequeker J, Geusens P (1990) Osteoporosis and arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 49:276–280

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dequeker J, Maenaut K, Verwilghen J, Westhovens R (1995) Osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 13:21–26

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sambrook PN (2000) The skeleton in rheumatoid arthritis: common mechanism for bone erosion and osteoporosis? J Rheumatol 27:2541–2542

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Alenfeld FE, Diessel E, Brezger M, Sieper J, Felsenberg D, Braun J (2000) Detailed analyses of periarticular osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis. Osteoporos Int 11:400–407

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Devlin J, Lilley J, Gough A, Huissoon A, Holder R, Reece R, Perkins P, Emery P (1996) Clinical association of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurement of hand bone mass in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 35:1256–1262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Njeh CF, Boivin CM, Gough A, Hans D, Srivastav SK, Bulmer N, Delvin J, Emery P (1999) Evaluation of finger ultrasound in the assessment of bone status with application of rheumatoid arthritis. Osteoporos Int 9:82–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sambrook PN, Ansell BM, Foster S, Gumpel JM, Hesp R, Reeve J (1985) Bone turnover in early rheumatoid arthritis. 2. Longitudinal bone density studies. Ann Rheum Dis 44:580–584

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Barnett E, Nordin B (1960) The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach. Clin Radiol 11:166−174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Black DM, Palermo L, Sorensen T, Jorgensen JT, Lewis C, Tylavsky F, Wallace R, Harris E, Cummings SR (2001) A normative reference database study for Pronosco X-posure System. J Clin Densitom 4:5–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Böttcher J, Pfeil A, Rosholm A, Malich A, Petrovitch A, Heinrich B, Lehmann G, Mentzel HJ, Hein G, Linß W, Kaiser WA (2005) Influence of image-capturing parameters on digital X-ray radiogrammetry. J Clin Densitom 8:87–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jorgensen JT, Andersen PB, Rosholm A, Bjarnason NH (2000) Digital X-ray radiogrammetry: a new appendicular bone densitometric method with high precision. Clin Physiol 20:330–335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Malich A, Freesmeyer MG, Mentzel HJ, Sauner D, Böttcher J, Petrovitch A, Behrendt W, Kaiser WA (2003) Normative values of bone parameters of children and adolescents using digital computer-assisted radiogrammetry (DXR). J Clin Densitom 6:103–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosholm A, Hylsdrup L, Baeksgaard L, Grunkin M, Thodberg HH (2001) Estimation of bone mineral density by digital X-ray radiogrammetry: theoretical background and clinical testing. Osteoporos Int 12:961–969

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shepherd JA, Meta M, Landau J, Sherrer YSR, Goddard DH, Ovalle MI, Rosholm A, Genant HK (2005) Metacarpal index and bone mineral density in healthy African-American women. Osteoporos Int Online first 10th June 2005

  20. Bouxsein ML, Palermo L, Yeung C, Black DM (2002) Digital X-ray radiogrammetry predicts hip, wrist and vertebral fracture in elderly women: a prospective analysis from the study of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 13:358–365

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hyldstrup L, Jorgensen JT, Sorensen TK, Baeksgaard L (2001) Response of cortical bone to antiresorptive treatment. Calcif Tissue Int 68:135–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Böttcher J, Malich A, Pfeil A, Petrovitch A, Lehmann G, Heyne JP, Hein G, Kaiser WA (2004) Potential clinical relevance of digital radiogrammetry for quantification of periarticular bone demineralization in patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis depending on severity and compared with DXA. Eur Radiol 14:631–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jensen T, Klarlund M, Hansen M, Jensen KE, Podenphant J, Hansen TM (2004) Bone loss in unclassified polyarthritis and early rheumatoid arthritis is better detected by digital radiogrammetry than dual X-ray absorptiometry: relationship with disease activity and radiographic outcome. Ann Rheum Dis 63:15–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stewart A, Mackenzie LM, Black AJ, Reid DM (2004) Predicting erosive disease in rheumatoid arthritis. A longitudinal study of changes in bone density using digital X-ray radiogrammetry: a pilot study. Rheumatology 43:1561–1564

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wuster C, Hadji P (2001) The use of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) in male osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 69:225–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Röben P, Barkmann R, Ullrich S, Gause A, Heller M, Gluer CC (2001) Assessment of phalangeal bone loss in patients with rheumatoid arthritis by quantitative ultrasound. Ann Rheum Dis 60:670–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Njeh CF, Boivin CM, Langton CM (1997) The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: a review. Osteoporos Int 7:7–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Antich P (1993) Ultrasound study of bone in vitro. Calcif Tissue Int 53:157–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Brandenburger G (1993) Clinical determination of bone quality: is ultrasound an answer? Calcif Tissue Int 53:151–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Duquette J, Honeyman T, Hoffman A, Ahmadi S, Baran D (1997) Effect of bovine bone constituents on broadband ultrasound attenuation measurements. Bone 21:289–294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gluer CC, WU CY, Jergas M, Goldstein SA, Genant HK (1994) Three quantitative ultrasound parameters reflect bone structure. Calcif Tissue Int 55:46–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Turner CH, Eich M (1991) Ultrasonic velocity as a predictor of strength in bovine cancellous bone. Calcif Tissue Int 49:116–119

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bauer DC, Gluer CC, Cauley JA, Vogt TM, Ensrud KE, Genant HK, Black DM (1997) Broadband ultrasound attenuation predicts fractures strongly and independently of densitometry in older women. A prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Arch Intern Med 157:629–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Daens S, Peretz A, de Maertelaer V, Moris M, Bergmann P (1999) Efficiency of quantitative ultrasound measurements as compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the assessment of corticoid-induced bone impairment. Osteoporos Int 10:278–283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hans D, Dargent-Molina P, Schott AM, Sebert JL, Cormier C, Kotzki PO, Delmas PD, Pouilles JM, Breart G, Meunier PJ (1996) Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fractures in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospective study. Lancet 348:511–514

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Haugeberg G, Orstavik RE, Uhlig T, Falch JA, Halse JI, Kvien TK (2003) Comparison of ultrasound and X-ray absorptiometry bone measurements in a case control study of female rheumatoid arthritis patients and randomly subjects in the population. Osteoporos Int 14:312–319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Barkmann R, Kantrovitch E, Singal C, Hans D, Genant HK, Heller M, Gluer CC (2000) A new method for quantitative ultrasound measurements at multiple skeletal sites - first results of precision and fracture discrimination. J Clin Densitom 3:1−7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Madsen OR, Suetta C, Egsmose C, Lorentzen JS, Sorensen OH (2004) Bone status in rheumatoid arthritis assessed at peripheral sites by three different quantitative ultrasound devices. Clin Rheumatol 23:324–329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fies FJ, Cooper NS (1988) The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 31:315–324

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hettenkofer HJ (2004) Rheumatologie: Diagnostik - klinik - therapic, 5th ed. Thieme, Berlin

  41. Van Gestel AM, Haagsma CJ, van Riel PL (1998) Validation of rheumatoid arthritis improvement criteria that include simplified joint counts. Arthritis Rheum 41:1845–1850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Aletaha D, Nell VP, Stamm T, Uffmann M, Pflugbeil S, Machold K, Smolen JS (2005) Acute phase reactants add little to composite disease activity indices for rheumatoid arthritis: validation of a clinical activity score. Arthritis Res Ther 7:R796–R806

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Larsen A, Dale K, Eek M (1977) Radiographic evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis and related conditions by standard reference films. Acta Radiol Diagn 18:481–491

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Steinbroker O, Traeger CH, Batterman RC (1949) Therapeutic criteria in rheumatoid arthritis. JAMA 140:659–662

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wuster C, Wenzler M, Kappes J, Rehm C, Gühring T, Arnbjerg C (2000) Digital X-ray radiogrammetry as a clinical method for estimating bone mineral density – a German reference database. J Bone Miner Res 15:298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Zadik Z, Price D, Diamond G (2003) Pediatric reference curves for multisite quantitative ultrasound and its modulators. Osteoporos Int 14:857–862

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Heilmann P, Wuster C, Prolingheuer C, Gotz M, Ziegler R (1998) Measurement of forearm bone mineral density: comparison of five different instruments. Calcif Tissue Int 62:383–387

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Steinschneider M, Hagag P, Rapoport MJ, Weiss M (2003) Discordant effect of body mass index on bone mineral density and speed of sound. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 4:15–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Martin JC, Munro R, Campbell MK, Reid DM (1997) Effects of disease and corticosteroids on appendicular bone mass in postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with axial measurements. Br J Rheumatol 36:43–49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Van der Heide A, Remme CA, Hofman DM, Jacobs JWG, Bijlsma JWJ (1995) Prediction of progression of radiologic damage in newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 38:1466–1474

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Böttcher J, Pfeil A, Lehmann G, Malich A, Hansch A, Heinrich B, Petrovitch A, Mentzel HJ, Hein G, Kaiser WA (2004) Clinical trial for differentiation between corticoid-induced osteoporosis and periarticular demineralization via digital radiogrammetry in patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis. Z Rheumatol 63:473–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Böttcher J, Pfeil A, Heinrich B, Lehmann G, Petrovitch A, Hansch A, Heyne JP, Malich A, Hein G, Kaiser WA (2005) Digital radiogrammetry as a new osteodensitometric technique and diagnostic tool in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int 25:457–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kalla AA, Meyers OL, Parkyn ND, Kotze TJ (1989) Osteoporosis screening – radiogrammetry revisited. Br J Rheumatol 28:511–517

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kalla AA, Meyers OL, Chalton D (1991) Increased metacarpal bone mass following 18 months of slow acting antirheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 30:91–100

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Jergas M (2003) Conventional radiographs and basic quantitative methods. In: Grampp S (ed), Radiology of osteoporosis. Springer, Berlin, pp 62–64

    Google Scholar 

  56. Dreher R, Thabe H, Schill S, Schulz A (2003) Die Rheumatoide Arthritis aus osteologischer Sicht. Osteologie 11(suppl 1):52

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Mr. A. Rosholm, PhD (Pronosco/Sectra) and Ms. M. Arens (Arewus) for the use of the X-posure equipment as well as Ms. L. Tsoref and Ms. T. Schwartz (Sunlight Medical) for the allocation of the Sunlight Omnisense 7000. We also thank Mr. D. Felsenberg, MD (Berlin, Germany), Mr. C. C. Gluer, PhD (Kiel, Germany), Mr. R. Rau, MD (Ratingen, Germany), Mr. S. Grampp, MD, and Mr. H. Imhof, MD (Vienna, Austria) for their comments regarding our study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Friedrich-Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany

    J. Böttcher, A. Pfeil, H. Mentzel, A. Kramer, M.-L. Schäfer, A. Petrovitch, A. Malich & W. A. Kaiser

  2. Department of Rheumatology and Osteology, Friedrich-Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany

    G. Lehmann, T. Eidner & G. Hein

Authors
  1. J. Böttcher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Pfeil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. Mentzel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Kramer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M.-L. Schäfer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. G. Lehmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. T. Eidner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. A. Petrovitch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. A. Malich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. G. Hein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. W. A. Kaiser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Böttcher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Böttcher, J., Pfeil, A., Mentzel, H. et al. Peripheral Bone Status in Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluated by Digital X-Ray Radiogrammetry and Compared with Multisite Quantitative Ultrasound. Calcif Tissue Int 78, 25–34 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-005-0175-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-005-0175-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation