Skip to main content
Log in

Discriminative Capacity of Calcaneal Quantitative Ultrasound and of Osteoporosis and Fracture Risk Factors in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporotic Fractures

  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bone fragility fractures constitute the principal complication of osteoporosis. The identification of individuals at high risk of sustaining osteoporotic fractures is important for implementing preventive measures. The purpose of this study is to analyze the discriminative capacity of a series of osteoporosis and fracture risk factors, and of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound (QUS), in a population of postmenopausal women with a history of osteoporotic fracture. A cross-sectional analysis was made of a cohort of 5195 women aged 65 or older (mean±SD: 72.3±5.4 years) seen in 58 primary care centers in Spain. A total of 1042 women (20.1%) presented with a history of osteoporotic fracture. Most fractures (93%) were non-vertebral. Age-adjusted odds ratios corresponding to each decrease in one standard deviation of the different QUS parameters ranged from 1.47 to 1.55 (P < 0.001) for fractures. The age-adjusted multivariate analysis yielded the following risk factors independently associated with a history of osteoporotic fracture: number of fertile years, a family history of fracture, falls in the previous year, a history of chronic obstructive airway disease, the use of antiarrhythmic drugs, and a low value for any of the QUS parameters. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the best model was 0.656. In summary, a series of easily assessable osteoporotic fracture risk factors has been identified. QUS was shown to discriminate between women with and without a history of fracture, and constitutes a useful tool for assessing fracture risk. Various of the vertebral and hip fracture risk factors frequently cited in North American and British populations showed no discriminative capacity in our series—thus suggesting that such factors may not be fully applicable to our population and/or to the predominant type of fractures included in the present study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. JA Kanis (2002) ArticleTitleDiagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. Lancet 359 1929–1936 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08761-5 Occurrence Handle12057569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. SR Cummings MC Nevitt WS Browner K Stone KM Fox et al. (1995) ArticleTitleRisk factors for hip fracture in white women. N Engl J Med 332 767–773 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqC28nislE%3D Occurrence Handle7862179

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. InstitutionalAuthorNameNational Osteoporosis Foundation (1988) ArticleTitleOsteoporosis: review of the evidence for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment and cost-effectiveness analysis. Osteoporos Int 8 IssueIDsuppl 4 S1–S88

    Google Scholar 

  4. P Dargent-Molina F Favier H Grandjean C Baudoin AM Schott et al. (1996) ArticleTitleFall-related factors and risk of hip fracture: the EPIDOS prospective study. Lancet 348 145–149 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB1MrivFA%3D Occurrence Handle8684153

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. JL Kelsey WS Browner DG Seeley MC Nevitt SR Cummings (1992) ArticleTitleRisk factors for fractures of the distal forearm and proximal humerus. Am J Epidemiol 135 477–489 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2B3sfks1E%3D Occurrence Handle1570814

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. SH Lee P Dargent-Molina G Bréart (2002) ArticleTitleRisk factors for fractures of the proximal humerus: results from the EPIDOS prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 17 817–825

    Google Scholar 

  7. JP Brown G Ioannidis A Papaioannou A Tenenhouse JC Prior et al. (2003) ArticleTitleRisk factors that predict the time of the first non-vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women recruited from the Canadian Multicentric Osteoporosis Study (CAMOS). Bone 32 S188

    Google Scholar 

  8. MK Karlsson Y Duan H Ahlborg KJ Obrant O Johnell et al. (2001) ArticleTitleAge, gender, and fragility fractures are associated with differences in quantitative ultrasound independent of bone mineral density. Bone 28 118–122 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S8756-3282(00)00407-5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzitFGqtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11165952

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. ML Frost GM Blake I Fogelman (2001) ArticleTitleQuantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density are equally strongly associated with risk factors for osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 16 406–416 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3ht1Wltw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11204441

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. ML Frost GM Blake I Fogelman (2001) ArticleTitleDoes the combination of quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry improve fracture discrimination? Osteoporos Int 12 471–477 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mzpt1entw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11446563

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. F Hartl A Tyndall M Kraenzlin C Bachmeier C Gückel et al. (2002) ArticleTitleDiscriminatory ability of quantitative ultrasound parameters and bone mineral density in a population-based sample of postmenopausal women with vertebral fractures: results of the Basel Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 17 321–330

    Google Scholar 

  12. ML Frost GM Blake I Fogelman (2002) ArticleTitleA comparison of fracture discrimination using calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and dual X-ray absorptiometry in women with a history of fracture at sites other than the spine and hip. Calcif Tissue Int 71 207–211 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XotFehtLo%3D Occurrence Handle12154392

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. F López-Rodríguez P Mezquita-Raya J de Dios Luna F Escobar-Jiménez M Muñoz-Torres (2003) ArticleTitlePerformance of quantitative ultrasound in the discrimination of prevalent osteoporotic fractures in a bone metabolic unit. Bone 32 571–578 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S8756-3282(03)00058-9 Occurrence Handle12753874

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. DC Bauer (1999) Clinical applications of quantitative ultrasound. CF Njeh D Hans T Fuerst CC Glüer HK Genant (Eds) Quantitative ultrasound: assessment of osteoporosis and bone status. Martin Dunitz Ltd London 284–297

    Google Scholar 

  15. PD Miller ES Siris E Barrett-Connor KG Faulkner LE Wehren et al. (2002) ArticleTitlePrediction of fracture risk in postmenopausal white women with peripheral bone densitometry: evidence from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment. J Bone Miner Res 17 2222–2230 Occurrence Handle12469916

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. SMF Pluijm WC Graafmans LM Bouter P Lips (1999) ArticleTitleUltrasound measurements for the prediction of osteoporotic fractures in elderly people. Osteoporos Int 9 550–556 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FovFGqsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10624464

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. PW Thompson J Taylor R Oliver A Fisher (1998) ArticleTitleQuantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the heel predicts wrist and osteoporosis-related fractures in women age 45-75 years. J Clin Densitom 1 219–225 Occurrence Handle10.1385/JCD:1:3:219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. E von Stetten H Ouellet KE Wilson JA Stein (1998) ArticleTitleEuropean Caucasian female reference data values for the Sahara clinical bone sonometer. Bone 23 IssueIDsuppl 5 S637

    Google Scholar 

  19. InstitutionalAuthorNameNIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis, Diagnosis, and Therapy (2001) ArticleTitleOsteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA 285 785–795 Occurrence Handle11176917

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. DG Seeley WS Browner MC Nevitt HK Genant JC Scott et al. (1991) ArticleTitleWhich fractures are associated with low appendicular bone mass in elderly women? The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Ann Intern Med 115 837–842 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2D28%2FjslI%3D Occurrence Handle1952469

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. JP Brown RG Josse (2002) ArticleTitle2002 Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of Osteoporosis in Canada. Can Med Assoc J 167 IssueID10 Suppl S1–34

    Google Scholar 

  22. MT Hannan DT Felson B Dawson-Hughes KL Tucker LA Cupples et al. (2000) ArticleTitleRisk factors for longitudinal bone loss in elderly men and women: the Framingham Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 15 710–@720 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3ktFOktw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10780863

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. MR Law AK Hackshaw (1997) ArticleTitleA meta-analysis of cigarette smoking, bone mineral density and risk of hip fracture: recognition of a major effect. Br Med J 315 841–846 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FhsVygsg%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. TP van Staa HGM Leufkens C Cooper (2002) ArticleTitleUtility of medical and drug history in fracture risk prediction among men and women. Bone 4 508–514 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S8756-3282(02)00848-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. DK Roy TW O’Neill JD Finn M Lunt AJ Silman et al. (2003) ArticleTitleDeterminants of incident vertebral fracture in men and women: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS). Osteoporos Int 14 19–26 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2Fms1Orug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12577181

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. G Albrand F Muñoz E Sornay-Rendu F DuBoeuf PD Delmas (2003) ArticleTitleIndependent predictors of all osteoporosis-related fractures in healthy postmenopausal women: the OFELY study. Bone 32 78–85 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S8756-3282(02)00919-5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2FntlajsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12584039

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. ME Tinatti M Speechley (1989) ArticleTitlePrevention of falls among the elderly. N Engl J Med 320 1055–1059 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiaC1c7ovFY%3D Occurrence Handle2648154

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. TP van Staa HGM Leufkens L Abenhaim B Zhang C Cooper (2000) ArticleTitleUse of oral corticosteroids and risk of fractures. J Bone Miner Res 15 993–1000 Occurrence Handle10841167

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. TP van Staa HGM Leufkens C Cooper (2000) ArticleTitleUse of inhaled corticosteroids and risk of fractures. J Bone Miner Res 16 581–588

    Google Scholar 

  30. AM Tromp JH Smit DJH Deeg LM Bouter P Lips (1998) ArticleTitlePredictors of falls and fractures in the longitudinal aging study, Amsterdam. J Bone Miner Res 13 1932–1939 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2Fmt1ajsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9844112

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. DD Sin JP Man SF Man (2003) ArticleTitleThe risk of osteoporosis in caucasian men and women with obstructive airways disease. Am J Med 114 10–14 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9343(02)01297-4 Occurrence Handle12543283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. RD Wasnich (1999) Epidemiology of osteoporosis. MJ Favus (Eds) Primer on the metabolic bone diseases and disorders of mineral metabolism Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Philadelphia 257–259

    Google Scholar 

  33. LJ Melton (1995) Epidemiology of fractures. BL Riggs LJ Melton III (Eds) Osteoporosis: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Lippincott & Raven Philadelphia 225–247

    Google Scholar 

  34. DJ Torgerson P Dolan (1998) ArticleTitlePrescribing by general practitioners after an osteoporotic fracture. Ann Rheum Dis 57 378–379 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cvksVWmtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9771215

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. JL Hernández Hernández I Fidalgo González M López Calderón JM Olmos Martinez J González Macias (2001) ArticleTitleDiagnóstico de osteoporosis mediante la radiografia lateral de tórax. Med Clin (Barc) 117 734–736

    Google Scholar 

  36. MT Cuddihy SE Gabriel CS Crowson EJ Atkinson C Tabini et al. (2002) ArticleTitleOsteoporosis intervention following distal forearm fractures: a missed opportunity? Arch Intern Med 162 421–426 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archinte.162.4.421 Occurrence Handle11863474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. MD Smith W Ross MJ Ahern (2001) ArticleTitleMissing a therapeutic window of opportunity: an audit of patients attending a tertiary teaching hospital with potentially osteoporotic hip and wrist fractures. J Rheumatol 28 2504–2508 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mnmt1yjsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11708425

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. JA Kanis LJ Melton C Christiansen CC Johnston N Khaltaev (1994) ArticleTitleThe diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 9 1137–1141 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqD28jgtFY%3D Occurrence Handle7976495

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. KG Faulkner E von Stetten P Miller (1999) ArticleTitleDiscordance in patient classification using T-scores. J Clin Densitom 2 343–350 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FhvVCrtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10548828

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. ES Leib L Lenchik JP Bilezikian MJ Maricic NB Watts (2002) ArticleTitlePosition statement of International Society for Clinical Densitometry Scientific Policy Development Conference: methodology. J Clin Densitom 5 IssueIDSuppl S5–S10 Occurrence Handle10.1385/JCD:5:3S:S05 Occurrence Handle12464706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Y Ikeda M Iki A Morita H Aihara S Kagamimori et al. (2002) ArticleTitleAge-specific values and cut-off levels for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in quantitative ultrasound measurements at the calcaneus with Sahara in healthy Japanese women: Japanese population-based osteoporosis (JPOS) study. Calcif Tissue Int 71 1–9 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00223-001-2079-6 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XmslOmu7s%3D Occurrence Handle12200654

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. J Damilakis K Perisinakis N Gourtsoyiannis (2001) ArticleTitleImaging ultrasonometry of the calcaneus: optimum T-score thresholds for the identification of osteoporosis subjects. Calcif Tissue Int 68 219–224 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXktFWhu7c%3D Occurrence Handle11353948

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. A Diez-Pérez F Marin J Vila M Abizanda A Cervera et al. (2003) ArticleTitleEvaluation of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound in a primary care setting as a screening tool for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. J Clin Densitom 6 237–245 Occurrence Handle10.1385/JCD:6:3:237 Occurrence Handle14514993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. A Peretz V De Maertelaer M Moris M Wouters P Bergmann (1999) ArticleTitleEvaluation of quantitative ultrasound and dual X-ray absorptiometry measurements in women with and without fractures. J Clin Densitom 2 127–133 Occurrence Handle10.1385/JCD:2:2:127 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvjtVSntA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10499971

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. K Honkanen R Honkanen L Heikkinen H Kroger S Saarikoski (1999) ArticleTitleValidity of self-reports of fractures in perimenopausal women. Am J Epidemiol 150 511–516 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzpvF2gsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10472951

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. MC Nevitt SR Cummings WS Browner DG Seeley JA Cauley et al. (1992) ArticleTitleThe accuracy of self-report of fractures in elderly women: evidence from a prospective study. Am J Epidemiol 135 490–499 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2B3sfks1I%3D Occurrence Handle1570815

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. AA Ismail TW O’Neill W Cockerill JD Finn JB Cannata et al. (2000) ArticleTitleValidity of self-report of fractures: results from a prospective study in men and women across Europe. Osteoporos Int 11 248–254 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s001980050288 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3osVamtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10824241

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by an unrestricted grant from the Department of Medical Research, Lilly S.A. Madrid (Spain).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Marin.

ECOSAP (Ecografia Ósea en Atención Primaria) Study Group:

ECOSAP (Ecografia Ósea en Atención Primaria) Study Group:

J. Brunet, J. Comerma (ABS Sant Llatzer, Terrassa); C. Rubio, S. Cañadas, M. Berenguer (ABS Florida Nord, Hospitalet); J.M. Pérez (ABS Florida Sur, Hospitalet); E. Galindo, R.M. Alcolea, T. Rama (ABS Llefiá Badalona); J.J. Montero (ABS Ronda Prim, Mataró); E. Marco, S. Saura (ABS Sarriá de Ter, Girona); C. Carbonell, A. Cama, C. Olmos (ABS Via Roma, Barcelona); R. Villafáfila, C, Bentue (ABS Viladecans II, Barcelona); G. Amorós, E. Barraquer (CAP Horta Lisboa, Barcelona); M.B. Brun, L. Pons (CAP Montcada i Reixac, Barcelona); M. Abizanda, A. Cervera (CAP Gran Via, Barcelona); J. Gálvez, E. Mira (C.S. Los Ángeles, Alicante); V. Borreguero, M.A. Cabrera (C.S. El Pla Hospital, Alicante); A. Cebreiro, M. Puchades, J. Cantero (C.S. Algemesi-Alfafar, Valencia); R. González, M.L. Altarriba, A. García (C.S. Salvador Pau, Valencia); M.A. Fortea, M.A. López (C.S. Campanar, Valencia); A. Gimeno, Z. Pla (C.S. La Alcudia, Valencia); C. Alfonso, B. García (C.S. San Andrés, Murcia); J.E. Carrasco, J. Aliaga (C.S. Abarán, Murcia); J.A. Godinez, A. Durán (C.S. Antequera, Málaga); S. Áivarez (C.S. Las Albarizas, Marbella); F. Ruiz (C.S. Las Lagunas, Mijas Costa); R. Moya, M.A. Martin, M.M. Pérez, R. Vera (C.S. Cerro del Águila, Sevilla); T. Guerrero, H. Sánchez (C.S. Fuensanta, Sevilla); J. Calvo, J.A. Alameda, T. Toscano (CS El Molino de la Vega, Huelva); D. Martín (C.S. Torredelcampo, Jaén); J.A. Castro, J. Ortiz (C.S. Cartuja-Almanjayar, Granada); J.J. Rascón, P. Arqueros (C.S. Ciudad Jardín, Almería); E. Santos, M. Turégano (C.S. Zona Centro, Cáceres); M. Espigares, J. Pozuelos (C.S. La Paz, Badajoz); G. Rodríguez, J.M. Comas (C.S. Puebla de Montalbán, Toledo); E. Magaña, J. Pérez (C.S. Estación “Paseo del Muelle”, Talavera de la Reina); F. Chavida, C. Cancelo (C.S. Brihuega, Guadalajara); F. Lorta (C.S. La Roda, Albacete); D. Zapatero, M. Sanz, A.C. Áivarez, D. Ramírez (C.S. Avda. de Daroca, Madrid); R. Julián, M.V. Castell (C.S. Peñagrande, Madrid); J.C. Muñoz, S. Tojeiro (C.S. San Fernando, Madrid); M.L. Pascual, I. Nieto (C.S. Paseo de la Chopera, Madrid); J.A. Granados, F. Gómez, S. Sánchez (C.S. Guayaba, Madrid); O. Ortega de Santos, I. Jimeno (C.S. Isla de Oza, Madrid); C. Cámara, R. Tarano; T. Cascales (C.S. Coronel de Palma, Madrid); C. Onrrubia, R. Martín (C.S. José Aguado, León); M. Borge, C. Gago (C.S. Arturo Eyres Sur, Valladolid); E. Blanco, I. Flores (C.S. Béjar, Salamanca); J.L. Aguayo, P. Benavides (C.S. Pumarín, Oviedo); R. Villanueva, J.C. de la Fuente (C.S. García Alonso “Bombero Etxaniz,” Bilbao); E. Sampedro, V. Rubio (C.S. Hermanos Iturrino, Irún); M.C. Napal, J.A. Tabar (C.S. Barañain, Navarra); M.D. Martínez, A. Brugos (C.S. Rochapea, Pamplona); F.E. Teruel (C.S. Txantrea, Pamplona); M. Flores, M. Tejedor, E. Royo (C.S. Espartero, Logroño); L.V. Hernández, (C.S. La Almunia, Zaragoza); R. Córdoba, G. Guillén, E. de la Figuera (C.S. Delicias Sur, Zaragoza); and M. Nieva, A. Pérez, (Dpto. Investigación Médica, Lilly S. A., Madrid).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hernández, J., Marin, F., González-Macías, J. et al. Discriminative Capacity of Calcaneal Quantitative Ultrasound and of Osteoporosis and Fracture Risk Factors in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporotic Fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 74, 357–365 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-003-0158-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-003-0158-6

Keywords

Navigation