Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Substituting anticipatory locomotor adjustments online is time constrained

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two crucial, multi-articular strategies for anticipatory locomotor adjustments (ALA) are knee flexor generation to step over obstacles and hip flexor generation to step up. While lower limb control can be adapted online to modify an already planned obstacle avoidance, or to avoid the sudden appearance of an obstacle, it is not known whether a planned ALA can be substituted by different one online. The present objective was to study such ALA substitutions at two specific timepoints: the final planning stage and the initiation of ALA execution. Ten healthy, young adults (22.0 ± 1.7 years; 5 males) walked in a Virtual Environment (VE) representing the laboratory within a head mounted display. Two blocks of trials, one involving an initial VE with an obstacle (OB) and the other an initial VE with a platform (PL) (heights of 15% of lower limb length for both), were presented, where the initial VE could remain unchanged or be randomly switched between them at one of the two timepoints. The final VE always corresponded to the real environment. Lead limb kinematics, joint kinetics and energetics, as well as electromyography were measured. Repeated measures ANOVAs were used to compare across conditions. Foot clearance, knee flexor generation, and hip flexor generation all changed in the expected directions for the final VEs when requiring early substitution, but not when switched late. These findings show that volitional, locomotor strategies may be substituted at the end of the ALA planning phase, but not once execution is initiated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andujar J-É, Lajoie K, Drew T (2010) A contribution of area 5 of the posterior parietal cortex to the planning of visually guided locomotion: limb-specific and limb-independent effects. J Neurophysol 103:986–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drew T (1993) Motor cortical activity during voluntary gait modifications in the cat. I. Cells related to the forelimbs. J Neurophysiol 70:179–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drew T, Marigold D (2015) Taking the next step: cortical contributions to the control of locomotion. Curr Opin Neurobiol 33:25–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drew T, Jiang W, Widajewicz W (2002) Contributions of the motor cortex to the control of the hindlimbs during locomotion in the cat. Brain Res Rev 20:178–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drew T, Prentice S, Schepens B (2004) Cortical and brainstem control of locomotion. Prog Brain Res 143:251–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dugas L, Bouyer L, McFadyen B (2018) Body-foot geometries as revealed by perturbed obstacle position with different time constraints. Exp Brain Res 236:711–720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elias LJ, Bryden MP, Bulman-Fleming MB (1998) Footedness is a better predictor than is handedness of emotional lateralization. Neuropsychologia 36:37–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Georgopoulos AP, Grillner S (1989) Visuomotor coordination in reaching and locomotion. Science 245:1209–1210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Higuchi T (2013) Visuomotor control of human adaptive locomotion: understanding the anticipatory nature. Front Psychol 4:277

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy R, Lane N, Berbaum KS (1993) Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int J Aviat Psychol 3:203–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lajoie K, Drew T (2007) Lesions of area 5 of the posterior parietal cortex in the cat produce errors in the accuracy of paw placement during visually guided locomotion. J Neurophysiol 97:2339–2354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacLellan MJ, Dupré N, McFadyen BJ (2011) Increased obstacle clearance in people with ARCA-1 results in part from voluntary coordination changes between the thigh and shank segments. Cerebellum 10(4):732–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-011-0283-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacLellan M, Richards CL, Fung J, McFadyen B (2015) Comparison of kinetic strategies for avoidance of an obstacle with either the paretic or non-paretic as leading limb in persons post stroke. Gait Posture 42:329–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McFadyen BJ, Carnahan H (1997) Anticipatory locomotor adjustments for accommodating versus avoiding level changes in humans. Exp Brain Res 114:500–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McFadyen B, Winter D (1991) Anticipatory locomotor adjustments during obstructed human walking. Neurosci Res Comm 9:37–44

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadyen BJ, Lavoie S, Drew T (1999) Kinetic and energetic patterns for hindlimb obstacle avoidance during cat locomotion. Exp Brain Res 125(4):502–510

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohagheghi AA, Moraes R, Patla AE (2004) The effects of distant and on-line visual information on the control of approach phase and step over an obstacle during locomotion. Exp Brain Res 155:459–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neptune R, Zajac F, Kautz S (2004) Muscle force redistributes segmental power for body progression during walking. Gait Posture 19:194–205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patla AE, Greig M (2006) Any way you look at it, successful obstacle negotiation needs visually guided on-line foot placement regulation during the approach phase. Neurosci Lett 397:110–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patla A, Prentice S (1995) The role of active forces and intersegmental dynamics in the control of limb trajectory over obstacles during locomotion in humans. Exp Brain Res 106:499–504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patla AE, Vickers JN (1997) Where and when do we look as we approach and step over an osbtacle in the travel path? Neuroreport 8:3661–3665

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patla A, Beuter A, Prentice S (1991) A two stage correction of the limb trajectory to avoid obstacles during stepping. Neurosci Res Commun 8:153–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentice SD, Hasler EN, Groves JJ, Frank JS (2004) Locomotor adaptations for changes in the slope of the walking surface. Gait Posture 20(3):255–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Queralt A, Weerdesteyn V, Van Duijnhoven HJ, Castellote JM, Valls-Solé J, Duysens J (2008) The effects of an auditory startle on obstacle avoidance during walking. J Physiol 586:4453–4463

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slater M, Usoh M, Steed A (1994) Depth of presence in virtual environments. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 3:130–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weerdesteyn V, Nienhuis B, Hampsink B, Duysens J (2004) Gait adjustments in response to an obstacle are faster than voluntary reactions. Hum Mov Sci 23:351–363

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington B, Silder A, Heiderscheit B, Thelen D (2008) The contribution of passive-elastic mechanisms to lower extremity joint kinetics during human walking. Gait Posture 27:628–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winter DA (1987) Sagittal plane balance and posture in human walking. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 6:8–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Witmer BG, Singer MJ (1998) Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence Teleoper Virtual Envir 7:225–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakovenko S, Krouchev N, Drew T (2011) Sequential activation of motor cortical neurons contributes to intralimb coordination during reaching in the cat by modulating muscle synergies. J Neurophysiology 105:388–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank N. Robitaille (programming), S. Forest (infrastructure construction) and G. St-Vincent (motion capture) for valuable technical assistance and Frédéric Dumont for assistance with the manuscript preparation. We also thank Dr. Philippe Jackson for the use of the HMD. This work was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN/191782-2017).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, CIUSSS-CN, IRDPQ, 525 Hamel, Québec, QC, G1M 2S8, Canada

    Bradford J. McFadyen, Félix Fiset & Caroline Charette

  2. Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada

    Bradford J. McFadyen, Félix Fiset & Caroline Charette

Authors
  1. Bradford J. McFadyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Félix Fiset
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Caroline Charette
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bradford J. McFadyen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McFadyen, B.J., Fiset, F. & Charette, C. Substituting anticipatory locomotor adjustments online is time constrained. Exp Brain Res 236, 1985–1996 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5277-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5277-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation