Abstract
Four versions of the Corsi Spatial Sequence Task (CSST) were tested in a complete within-subject design, investigating whether participants’ performance depends on the modality of task presentation and reproduction that put different demands on spatial processing. Presentation of the sequence (encoding phase) and the reproduction (recall phase) were each carried out either on a computer screen or on the floor of a room, involving actual walking in the recall phase. Combinations of the two different encoding and recall procedures result in the modality conditions Screen–Screen, Screen–Floor, Floor–Screen, and Floor–Floor. Results show the expected decrease in performance with increasing sequence length, which is likely due to processing limitations of working memory. We also found differences in performance between the modality conditions indicating different involvements of spatial working memory processes. Participants performed best in the Screen–Screen modality condition. Floor–Screen and Floor–Floor modality conditions require additional working memory resources for reference frame transformation and spatial updating, respectively; the resulting impairment of the performance was about the same in these two conditions. Finally, the Screen–Floor modality condition requires both types of additional spatial demands and led to the poorest performance. Therefore, we suggest that besides the well-known spatial requirements of CSST, additional working memory resources are demanded in walking CSST supporting processes such as spatial updating, mental rotation, reference frame transformation, and the control of walking itself.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amorim MA (2003) What is my avatar seeing? The coordination of “out-of-body” and “embodied” perspectives for scene recognition across views. Vis Cogn 10:157–199. doi:10.1080/713756678
Baddeley A (2000) The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends Cogn Sci 4(11):417–423. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2
Baddeley A, Hitch GJ (1974) Working memory. The psychology of learning and motivation, pp 47–89
Barrouillet P, Camos V (2007) The time-based resource-sharing model of working memory. In: Osaka N, Logie RH, D’ Esposito M (ed) The cognitive neuroscience of working memory, pp 59–80
Berch DB, Krikorian R, Huha EM (1998) The Corsi Block-Tapping Task: methodological and theoretical considerations. Brain Cogn 38:317–338. doi:10.1006/brcg.1998.1039
Bisiach E, Luzzatti C (1978) Unilateral neglect of representational space. Cortex 14:129–133. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(78)80016-1
Burgess N (2006) Spatial memory: How egocentric and allocentric combine. Trends Cogn Sci 10:551–557. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.005
Burgess N, Spiers HJ, Paleologou E (2004) Orientational manoeuvres in the dark: dissociation allocentric and egocentric influences on spatial memory. Cognition 94:149–166. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.001
Busch RM, Farrell K, Lisdahl-Medina K, Krikorian R (2005) Corsi Block-Tapping Task performance as a function of path configuration. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 27:127–134. doi:10.1080/138033990513681
Byrne P, Becker S, Burgess N (2007) Remembering the past and imagining the future: a neural model of spatial memory and imagery. Psychol Rev 114:340–375. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.340
Corsi PM (1972) Human memory and the medial temporal region of the brain. Doctoral thesis. Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal
Cowan N (2000) The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behav Brain Sci 24:87–185
Dehaene S, Izard V, Pica P, Spelke E (2006) Core knowledge of geometry in an Amazonian indigene group. Science 311:381–384. doi:10.1126/science.1121739
Dhindsa K, Drobinin V, King J, Hall GB, Burgess N, Becker S (2014) Examining the role of the temporo-parietal network in memory, imagery, and viewpoint transformations. Front Hum Neurosci 8:1–13. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00709
Diwadkar VA, McNamara TP (1997) Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychol Sci 8(4):302–307. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00442.x
Farrell MJ, Robertson IH (1998) Mental rotation and the automatic updating of body-centered spatial relationships. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 24:227–233. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.24.1.227
Fischer MH (2001) Probing spatial working memory with the Corsi Blocks Task. Brain Cogn 45:143–154. doi:10.1006/brcg.2000.1221
Hardiess G, Basten K, Mallot HA (2011) Acquisition vs. memorization trade-offs are modulated by walking distance and pattern complexity in a large scale copying paradigm. PLoS ONE 6(4):e18494. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018494
Klatzky RL, Wu B (2008) The embodied actor in multiple frames of reference. In: Klatzky RL, MacWhinney B, Behrmann M (eds) Embodiment, ego-space, and action. Psychology Press, Abingdon-on-Thames, pp 145–177
Klatzky RL, Loomis JM, Beall AC, Chance SS, Golledge RG (1998) Spatial updating of self-position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Psych Sci 9(4):293–298. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00058
Klauer KC, Zhao Z (2004) Double dissociations in visual and spatial short-term memory. J Exp Psychol Gen 133(3):355–381. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.355
Lépine R, Barrouillet P, Camos V (2005) What makes working memory spans so predictive of high-level cognition? Psychon Bull Rev 12(1):165–170
Loomis JM, Klatzky RL, Golledge RG, Cicinelli JG, Pellegrino JW et al (1993) Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: assessment of path integration ability. J Exp Psychol Gen 122:73–91. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.122.1.73
Loomis JM, Klatzky RL, Giudice NA (2013) Representing 3D space in working memory: spatial images from vision, hearing, touch, and language. In: Lacey S, Lawson R (eds) Multisensory imagery: theory and applications. Springer, New York, pp 131–156
Meilinger T, Berthoz A, Wiener J (2011) The integration of spatial information across different viewpoints. Mem Cogn 39(6):1042–1054. doi:10.3758/s13421-011-0088-x
Miller GA (1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psych Rev. 63:81–97. doi:10.1037/h0043158
Milner B (1971) Interhemispheric differences in the localization of psychological processes in man. Br Med Bull 27:272–277
Nori R, Piccardi L, Migliori M, Guidazzoli A, Frasca F, De Luca D, Giusbert F (2015) The virtual reality walking Corsi test. Comput Human Behav 48:72–77. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.035
Orsini A, Schiappa O, Grossi D (1981) Sex and culture differences in children’s spatial and verbal-memory span. Percept Mot Skills 53:39–42. doi:10.2466/pms.1981.53.1.39
Orsini A, Pasquadibisceglie M, Picone L, Tortora R (2001) Factors which influence the difficulty of the spatial path in Corsi’s Block-Tapping Test. Percept Mot Skills 92:732–738. doi:10.2466/pms.2001.92.3.732
Perrochon A, Kemoun G, Dugué B, Berthoz A (2014) Cognitive impairment assessment through visuospatial memory can be performed with a modified Walking Corsi Test using the ‘Magic Carpet’. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 4:1–13. doi:10.1159/000356727
Philbeck JW, Loomis JM (1997) Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 23:72–75. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.23.1.72
Piccardi L, Iaria G, Ricci M, Bianchini F, Zompant L, Guariglia C (2008) Walking in the Corsi test: which type of memory do you need? Neurosci Lett 432:127–131. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2007.12.044
Ploner CJ, Gaymard B, Rivaus S, Agid Y, Pierrot-Deseilligny C (1998) Temporal limits of spatial working memory in humans. Eur J Neurosci 10:794–797. doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.1998.00101.x
Repovš G, Baddeley A (2006) The multi-component model of working memory: explorations in experimental cognitive psychology. Neuroscience 139:5–21. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.12.061
Röhrich WG, Hardiess G, Mallot HA (2014) View-based organization and interplay of spatial working and long-term memories. PLoS ONE 9(11):e112793. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112793
Schindler A, Bartels A (2013) Parietal cortex codes for egocentric space beyond the field of view. Curr Biol 23:177–182. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.11.060
Smirni P, Villardita C, Zappalà G (1983) Influence of different paths on spatial memory performance in the Block-Tapping Test. J Clin Neuropsychol 5(4):355–359. doi:10.1080/01688638308401184
Smyth MM, Scholey KA (1992) Determining spatial span: the role of movement time and articulation rate. Q J Exp Psychol A 45:479–501. doi:10.1080/02724989208250624
Vandierendonck A, Kemps E, Fastme MC, Szmalec A (2004) Working memory components of the Corsi blocks task. Br J Psychol 95:57–79. doi:10.1348/000712604322779460
Vann SD, Aggleton JP, Maguire EA (2009) What does the retrosplenial cortex do? Nat Rev Neurosci 10:792–802. doi:10.1038/nrn2733
Vilkki J, Holst P (1989) Deficient programming in spatial learning after frontal lobe damage. Neuropsychologia 27:971–976. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(89)90072-9
Vingerhoets G, Lannoo E, Bauwens S (1996) Analysis of the money road-map test performance in normal and brain-damaged subjects. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 11(1):1–9. doi:10.1093/arclin/11.1.1
Vogeley K, May M, Ritzl A, Falkai P, Zilles K, Fink GR (2004) Neural correlates of first-person perspective as one constituent of human self-consciousness. J Cogn Neurosci 16(5):817–827. doi:10.1162/089892904970799
Wang RF, Simons DJ (1999) Active and passive scene recognition across views. Cognition 70:191–210. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00012-8
Wiener JM, Mallot HA (2003) ‘Fine-to-coarse’ route planning and navigation in regionalized environments. Spat Cogn Comput. 3:331–358. doi:10.1207/s15427633scc0304_5
Wolbers T, Wiener JM, Mallot HA, Büchel C (2007) Differential recruitment of the hippocampus, medial prefrontal cortex, and the human motion complex during path integration in humans. J Neurosci 27(35):9408–9416. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2146-07.2007
Wolbers T, Hegarty M, Büchel C, Loomis JM (2008) Spatial updating: how the brain keeps track of changing object locations during observer motion. Nat Neurosci 11(10):1223–1230. doi:10.1038/nn.2189
Acknowledgments
Supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the Tübingen Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience (Grant No 01GQ1002A). We are grateful to Dörte Kuhrt for help with the collection and initial analysis of the data and to Heinz Bendele for help with the experimental setup.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Röser, A., Hardiess, G. & Mallot, H.A. Modality dependence and intermodal transfer in the Corsi Spatial Sequence Task: Screen vs. Floor. Exp Brain Res 234, 1849–1862 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4582-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4582-z